Solana confirmed on X that its network has been under a sustained Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack for over a week, with traffic peaking near 6 terabitsSolana confirmed on X that its network has been under a sustained Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack for over a week, with traffic peaking near 6 terabits

Solana Absorbs One of the Largest DDoS Attacks Ever Recorded

2025/12/18 02:53

Solana confirmed on X that its network has been under a sustained Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack for over a week, with traffic peaking near 6 terabits per second.

By scale, Solana says the incident ranks as the fourth-largest attack ever recorded across any distributed system.

That number alone is extreme. But the more important detail sits beneath it.

Despite the pressure, Solana’s network performance did not degrade. On-chain activity remained stable. Confirmations stayed under one second. Slot latency showed no abnormal behavior. From the outside, users wouldn’t have known anything unusual was happening.

Solana emphasized that this outcome is not accidental. One of the network’s core design goals is to continue operating normally under adversarial conditions, including large-scale network attacks. Over the past week, that principle moved from theory to practice.

While attacks of this magnitude often expose structural weaknesses, Solana continued processing transactions as usual. No emergency measures. No visible slowdown. No congestion-driven fee spikes.

The network just kept running.

What a 6 Tbps DDoS Attack Really Means

Six terabits per second is hard to visualize. It represents an enormous volume of data, comparable to millions of high-definition video streams hitting a single destination at the same time. Except here, the traffic wasn’t legitimate. It was deliberately malicious.

To understand why this matters, it helps to separate a DoS attack from a DDoS attack.

A Denial of Service attack usually comes from a single source. One device floods a target with traffic until it can’t respond. These attacks are disruptive, but relatively easy to stop. Block the IP address. The attack ends.

A DDoS attack works differently.

Instead of one device, attackers deploy thousands or millions of compromised machines, known collectively as a botnet. These machines can be everyday devices: computers, routers, cameras, and other internet-connected hardware infected with malware. Once controlled remotely, they act in unison.

Each device sends traffic simultaneously.

That “distributed” nature makes DDoS attacks far harder to mitigate. You’re no longer blocking one source. You’re facing traffic from across the internet, arriving all at once.

In blockchain systems, DDoS attacks often appear as transaction spam. Attackers attempt to overwhelm the network by submitting massive volumes of transactions or requests, hoping to slow block production, increase latency, or raise fees.

That’s exactly why Solana’s response is notable. The attack hit hard. And the network absorbed it.

How Solana Continued Operating Without Disruption

According to Solana, internal network data showed no measurable impact throughout the attack window. Confirmations stayed fast. Slot times remained stable. Validators stayed in sync.

This outcome reflects how the network is built.

Solana’s architecture emphasizes high throughput, parallel execution, and rapid message propagation between validators. Rather than forcing transactions through a narrow execution bottleneck, the network spreads workload across available resources.

During a DDoS event, that design matters.

Where some networks experience backlogs, rising fees, or validator delays under heavy spam, Solana showed none of those symptoms. The attack did not trigger congestion. Gas fees did not spike. Users did not experience delays.

From the perspective of applications running on Solana, DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, payments, and consumer apps, operations continued as normal.

That’s the key point. Resilience isn’t just about surviving an attack. It’s about doing so without degrading the user experience.

A Clear Contrast as Sui Faces Disruptions

The timing of this incident adds important context. During the same period, the Sui network was also targeted by a DDoS attack. The outcome there was very different.

Sui experienced delays in block production and periods of degraded network performance. Normal operations were impacted. The attack produced visible effects.

This contrast highlights a reality across blockchain infrastructure. Not all networks respond the same way under stress. DDoS resilience isn’t theoretical. It’s operational.

When a network slows under attack, applications suffer. Users feel it. Builders take note.

Solana’s experience shows the opposite scenario. Even under sustained pressure at historic scale, the network continued functioning as designed. That difference matters as blockchains move closer to real-world financial and consumer use cases.

Attacks aren’t rare. They’re expected. Networks that plan for them gain credibility.

What This Means for Solana and Its Ecosystem

Solana’s native asset, SOL, underpins transaction fees, staking, and validator incentives across the network. It plays a central role in securing the chain and enabling on-chain activity across DeFi, NFTs, payments, and consumer applications.

This event strengthens a narrative that has been building around Solana: performance under real conditions matters more than benchmarks.

It’s easy to claim speed in ideal scenarios. It’s harder to maintain stability when faced with sustained hostile traffic measured in terabits per second. Over the past week, Solana demonstrated that its design choices translate into real resilience.

That matters for developers deciding where to deploy applications. It matters for users who expect networks to remain available. And it matters as blockchains increasingly resemble critical infrastructure rather than experimental technology.

Solana’s message throughout the incident remained consistent and calm. The attack happened. It was massive. And it did not succeed.

In an environment where reliability is becoming a differentiator, that outcome speaks for itself.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Market Opportunity
Everscale Logo
Everscale Price(EVER)
$0.00818
$0.00818$0.00818
-1.56%
USD
Everscale (EVER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav integrates Chainlink oracles to deliver neutral on-chain NAV, restoring trust during volatile DeFi markets. October shocks exposed DeFi operating without
Share
Crypto News Flash2025/12/21 17:51
SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

The SEC has filed proposed final consent judgments against former FTX executives. Key figures involved include Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/21 18:06
SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

The post SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu investors uneasy as Kusama’s silence fuels leadership concerns. SHIB slid 13% in three days, retracing from $0.00001484 to $0.00001305. Shibarium exploit and Kusama’s absence have weighed on investor trust. Shiba Inu investors are voicing concerns about the project’s long-term direction as leadership uncertainty and slow ecosystem progress erode confidence.  The token, which rallied from its meme-coin origins to become the second-largest meme asset by market cap, counts more than 1.5 million holders worldwide. But as SHIB matures, the gap between early hype and current delivery has widened.  The project’s transition into an “ecosystem coin” with spin-off projects and Shibarium, its layer-2 network, once raised expectations. Analysts now point to internal challenges as the main factor holding SHIB back from fulfilling that potential. Kusama’s Silence Adds to Instability Central to the debate is the role of Shytoshi Kusama, Shiba Inu’s pseudonymous lead developer. Investors are concerned about the intermittent disappearance of the project’s lead developer, who repeatedly takes unannounced social media breaks.  For instance, Kusama went silent on X for over a month before resurfacing this week amid growing speculation that he had abandoned the Shiba Inu project.  Kusama returned shortly after the Shibarium bridge suffered an exploit worth around $3 million. However, he did not directly address the issue but only reassured Shiba Inu community members of his commitment to advancing the project.  Although most community members didn’t complain about Kusama’s anonymity in the project’s initial stages, his recent behavior has raised concerns. Many are beginning to develop trust issues, particularly because nobody could reveal the SHIB developer’s identity for the past five years. He has conducted all communications under pseudonyms. SHIB Price Action Reflects Sentiment Shift Market reaction has mirrored the doubts. SHIB, which spiked 26% at the start of September, has since reversed. Over the last…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:13