WILMINGTON, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#activistinvestor–The following is a letter from the Boyar Value Group to the Board of Directors of UniFirst Corporation: The WILMINGTON, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#activistinvestor–The following is a letter from the Boyar Value Group to the Board of Directors of UniFirst Corporation: The

Boyar Value Group Urges UniFirst Board to Immediately Initiate Strategic Review Following 60%+ Premium Offer

WILMINGTON, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#activistinvestor–The following is a letter from the Boyar Value Group to the Board of Directors of UniFirst Corporation:

The Board of Directors

UniFirst Corporation

68 Jonspin Road

Wilmington, MA 01887

Dear Members of the Board:

We are writing in light of Cintas Corporation’s renewed $275 per-share all-cash proposal, which represents a premium in excess of 60% of UniFirst’s Corporation’s December 19, 2025 closing share price, and to urge the Board to immediately initiate a formal review of strategic alternatives, including engaging an independent investment bank and opening a competitive sale process.

Most notably, Cintas has now included a $350 million reverse termination fee—representing more than 6.5% of the total transaction value—payable to UniFirst if the transaction is blocked on antitrust grounds. In our prior discussions with UniFirst board members and senior executives, the absence of a sufficiently credible breakup fee was repeatedly cited as a key reason the Company declined to meaningfully engage with Cintas in earlier iterations of its proposal(s). That objection has now been unequivocally removed.

Put simply, the Board no longer has a defensible rationale for refusing to engage.

The current proposal materially de-risks regulatory uncertainty for UniFirst shareholders, includes no financing contingency, requires no Cintas shareholder approval, and is backed by a reverse termination fee that meaningfully compensates UniFirst in the event of an adverse regulatory outcome. Under these circumstances, a continued refusal to initiate a formal review of strategic alternatives is increasingly difficult to reconcile with the Board’s fiduciary obligations.

As we stated in our December 3, 2025, letter:

“We believe that UniFirst is an asset that would be highly coveted in a competitive sale process by both strategic and financial buyers.”

That belief has only been reinforced by Cintas’s renewed proposal, which demonstrates that credible strategic interest remains strong—and that such interest is now accompanied by terms that directly address one of the Board’s previously stated concerns.

We want to be clear: we are not advocating for the acceptance of any single offer. We are advocating for a process. The Board’s duty is not to pre-judge outcomes, but to ensure that all reasonable paths to value maximization are thoroughly and independently explored. That duty runs to all shareholders, not to any single constituency.

While we fully recognize the Croatti family’s long history with the Company and their substantial ownership stake, UniFirst is a public company. The Board’s fiduciary responsibility is to the entire shareholder base not just to a group that controls its Class B shares. Continued inaction—particularly in the face of a materially improved, de-risked proposal—creates the appearance that certain shareholders’ preferences are being afforded disproportionate weight relative to the interests of minority owners.

Accordingly, we believe it is imperative that the Board immediately:

  • Publicly announce that UniFirst is undertaking a review of strategic alternatives;
  • Reengage with advisors including an independent investment bank;
  • Open a robust, competitive process engaging all credible strategic and financial buyers;
  • Commit to transparency with shareholders regarding the process and its conclusions.

Anything less risks further erosion of shareholder confidence and raises serious questions about whether the Board is fulfilling its fiduciary duty to maximize value.

UniFirst is a solid business, but the Company’s prolonged relative underperformance, combined with repeated refusals to engage with credible acquirers—even when prior objections have been explicitly addressed—leaves shareholders with no reasonable basis to conclude that the status quo serves their best interests.

We remain available to engage constructively. But at this point, decisive action is required.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Boyar

Principal

The Boyar Value Group

Clients of Boyar Asset Management own shares of UNF

Contacts

Media Contact:
Amalia Danci
The Boyar Value Group

amalia@boyarvaluegroup.com
(212) 995-8300

www.boyarvaluegroup.com

Market Opportunity
MASS Logo
MASS Price(MASS)
$0.0003757
$0.0003757$0.0003757
+4.68%
USD
MASS (MASS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

“Oversold” Solana Mirroring Previous Bottoms

“Oversold” Solana Mirroring Previous Bottoms

The post “Oversold” Solana Mirroring Previous Bottoms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Advertisement &nbsp &nbsp Major cryptocurrency Solana is currently wandering
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/24 04:00
XRP Takes Hit as Whales Sell 1 Billion Coins, But Pro-Ripple Attorney Says XRP Will ‘Shock the World in 2026’

XRP Takes Hit as Whales Sell 1 Billion Coins, But Pro-Ripple Attorney Says XRP Will ‘Shock the World in 2026’

XRP is under pressure as broad market weakness and aggressive whale selling push the crypto into a deeper short-term decline. According to CoinMarketCap data, XRP
Share
Coinstats2025/12/24 03:56
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52