Bitcoin has not suffered any excellent selling pressure in over 1,079 days, as per on-chain analyst Axel Adler Jr., and has reached almost a historic record. Bitcoin has not suffered any excellent selling pressure in over 1,079 days, as per on-chain analyst Axel Adler Jr., and has reached almost a historic record.

Bitcoin Nears Record Stretch of 1079 Days Without Heavy Selling as Market Holds Steady at High Levels

bitcoin25 main

Bitcoin has not suffered any excellent selling pressure in over 1,079 days, as per on-chain analyst Axel Adler Jr., and has reached almost a historic record.

The former record is 1,125 days. As Bitcoin trading approaches high levels of prices, the absence of extreme selling has attracted the interest of traders and long-term investors waiting to observe whether the record will be broken or not.

The data indicates the sellers’ unusual period of silence, which contrasts with their reaction to emotions or headlines. It establishes expectations regarding the way in which the market is likely to react in the upcoming weeks or months.

A Rare Period of Seller Silence

Adler states that the present market trend of Bitcoin does not depict any indicators of typical distribution. Massive holders are not falling all over themselves to lock in profits, and panic selling is not evident.

Long periods of no sell pressure have rarely been experienced in the past, most particularly during periods of high prices. Earlier in past cycles, there was a heavy selling tendency, either to reap profits or to exit amid uncertainty.

However, the current data indicate that selling should be restrained. Much of the long-term ownership appears to have reached its limit for holding rather than exiting, even though Bitcoin is trading significantly above the averages of past cycles.

This silence is not an indication of certain growth but is a promise of confidence among the already existing players.

What the Statistics Say

Axel Adler Jr. bases this observation on data, not market sentiment. Lack of extreme selling indicates that the market is not experiencing stresses and fear.

The main data indicators that are absent in the market are:

  • No mass profit-taking from long-term holders.
  • No capitulation during recent pullbacks.
  • No broad distribution into strength.

Researchers find that these factors precede serious market declines. Their non-existence is an indication that the market is consistent, though there might be a slow momentum.

To most analysts, this strengthens the fact that Bitcoin is holding the range as opposed to a topping stage.

Current Bitcoin Price Range and Critical Levels

Bitcoin is currently trading at approximately 87,500 and has stayed within a specified range over the past few weeks. The price has been ranging between around $80000 and $93000.

Short-term expectations remain on technical roots. The zone of $93,000 has become a significant resistance, and its support is at $83,000. So far as price remains within this range, the traders are looking at consolidation instead of a big breakout.

The daily Relative Strength Index stands close to 43, which means a neutral momentum. This gives the idea that there is no strong buying pressure or selling pressure that is prevailing in the market.

In market structure, such behavior is usually volatile prior to volatility being returned.

Why No Sell Pressure Matters

In the past Bitcoin cycles, the heavy selling normally came as the prices neared significant highs. Judging by early shifts in profits, they used to provoke broad distributions, which were then offset more severely.

This is a lack of behavior that is remarkable today. It suggests that the buyers are yet to believe that the market is at its last climax. Many, on the contrary, seem to be content to wait, even for lateral movement.

And the fact that patience can affect the future. When there is a demand and the supply is tight, in the long run, the price pressure may develop. Conversely, selling may develop soon when confidence is lost.

Until now, none of the scenarios has been dominant.

What This Means for the Future Market

This absence of selling force is not indicative of the future rising of Bitcoin. Adler mentions that being silent doesn’t mean instantaneous growth.

Nonetheless, history demonstrates that significant movements are followed by long compressions. In the case of low sell orders and a fixed price, even small fluctuations in demand can have disproportionately large impacts.

Traders are closely monitoring resistance, and long-term players appear to be comfortable with holding during consolidation. In case Bitcoin overcomes the resistance, the preliminary distribution may aid in the better continuation. 

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005432
$0.0005432$0.0005432
+1.19%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

PANews reported on December 28 that, according to Lookonchain monitoring, two newly created wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC (US$13.5 million) from Binance in the past
Share
PANews2025/12/28 09:13
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
Musk expressed concern about the soaring price of silver.

Musk expressed concern about the soaring price of silver.

PANews reported on December 28th that Tesla CEO Elon Musk expressed concern about rising silver prices. He posted on the social media platform "X," stating, "This
Share
PANews2025/12/28 09:24