A new lawsuit has just alleged that  Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, avoided over $1 billion in losses by selling shares during the company’sA new lawsuit has just alleged that  Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, avoided over $1 billion in losses by selling shares during the company’s

Armstrong, Other Coinbase Execs Face Lawsuit Over Alleged Insider Trading

  • A new lawsuit has just alleged that  Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, avoided over $1 billion in losses by selling shares during the company’s 2021 direct listing.
  • Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick has just ruled that the lawsuit will proceed.
  • Coinbase board member Marc Andreessen is accused of offloading $118.7 million in stock through his venture firm, Andreessen Horowitz.

A legal battle involving Coinbase has just taken on another turn. A Delaware judge recently decided that a shareholder lawsuit against some of the exchange’s top executives can continue. 

This case is related to how years ago, leaders at the company allegedly used insider information to protect their own wealth, at the expense of investors.

The Coinbase Insider Trading Lawsuit

The legal battle dates back to April 2021, when the company first hit the public markets. 

Unlike most firms, it chose a direct listing, which is different from a traditional initial public offering. Existing shareholders could also sell their stock immediately and there were no lockup periods to stop them from exiting. 

The lawsuit claims that insiders took full advantage of this setup, and Shareholder Adam Grabski, who initially filed the original complaint, is demanding reparations. 

He alleged that directors sold more than $2.9 billion in stock and according to the filing, CEO Brian Armstrong sold roughly $291.8 million himself. 

Chief Operating Officer Emilie Choi and co-founder Fred Ehrsam also reportedly sold hundreds of millions in shares and the plaintiffs believe these leaders knew the stock was overvalued before the public found out.

Why the Judge Rejected the Dismissal Request

The company tried to end this case early, and formed a special litigation committee to investigate the claims. 

This committee spent ten months reviewing the stock sales and eventually cleared the directors of any wrongdoing. They argued that the sales were small and necessary for market liquidity. 

However, Judge McCormick found a problem with the committee itself.

One member of the committee, Gokul Rajaram, has deep ties to board member Marc Andreessen. For context, Andreessen is one of the accused individuals in the Coinbase lawsuit. 

Records show that Rajaram and Andreessen Horowitz participated in at least 50 financing rounds together since 2019 and the judge noted that these “thick ties” create a conflict of interest. 

She did not accuse anyone of acting in bad faith, but noted that the lack of total independence was enough to keep the case alive.

Record Sales and Dropping Valuations

The timing of the stock sales is also another point in this. When the company went public, shares started trading at $381. 

Just five weeks later, the price fell by more than 37%. This drop happened as the firm showed new details about its revenue. It also announced a deal that would dilute existing shares and by mid-May, billions of dollars in market value had vanished.

The lawsuit is pointing to an internal tax valuation that was much lower than the market price, and the plaintiffs argue that directors saw this data and decided to sell before the crash. 

While plaintiffs say that Marc Andreessen allegedly sold $118.7 million through his firm during this window, the defendants strongly deny these claims. 

They argued that the stock price simply follows the movement of Bitcoin, and they insist they were “bullish” on the company and only sold a tiny fraction of their holdings.

The post Armstrong, Other Coinbase Execs Face Lawsuit Over Alleged Insider Trading appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Nvidia Partners with Former Crypto Miner Nscale for UK AI Infrastructure Project

Nvidia Partners with Former Crypto Miner Nscale for UK AI Infrastructure Project

TLDR Nvidia announced a $683 million investment in Nscale, a UK AI infrastructure company that spun off from crypto miner Arkon Energy in May 2024 The partnership aims to scale the UK’s AI capacity to 60,000 GPUs by 2026 as part of the government’s national AI infrastructure push Nscale is part of the “neocloud” industry [...] The post Nvidia Partners with Former Crypto Miner Nscale for UK AI Infrastructure Project appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 16:24
A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

The post A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix Everyone has wondered what may be the next step for KPop Demon Hunters as an IP, given its record-breaking success on Netflix. Now, the answer may be something exactly no one predicted. According to a new filing with the MPA, something called Debut: A KPop Demon Hunters Story has been rated PG by the ratings body. It’s listed alongside some other films, and this is obviously something that has not been publicly announced. A short film could be well, very short, a few minutes, and likely no more than ten. Even that might be pushing it. Using say, Pixar shorts as a reference, most are between 4 and 8 minutes. The original movie is an hour and 36 minutes. The “Debut” in the title indicates some sort of flashback, perhaps to when HUNTR/X first arrived on the scene before they blew up. Previously, director Maggie Kang has commented about how there were more backstory components that were supposed to be in the film that were cut, but hinted those could be explored in a sequel. But perhaps some may be put into a short here. I very much doubt those scenes were fully produced and simply cut, but perhaps they were finished up for this short film here. When would Debut: KPop Demon Hunters theoretically arrive? I’m not sure the other films on the list are much help. Dead of Winter is out in less than two weeks. Mother Mary does not have a release date. Ne Zha 2 came out earlier this year. I’ve only seen news stories saying The Perfect Gamble was supposed to come out in Q1 2025, but I’ve seen no evidence that it actually has. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix It could be sooner rather than later as Netflix looks to capitalize…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:23
US Senate Passes Bipartisan Funding Bill to Prevent Shutdown

US Senate Passes Bipartisan Funding Bill to Prevent Shutdown

The US Senate approves a $1.2T bipartisan funding bill, avoiding a prolonged government shutdown while awaiting House action.
Share
CoinLive2026/02/01 11:02