'By operating in Intel’s facilities, ACM could gain exposure to cutting-edge chipmaking processes that may materially improve the quality and competitiveness of'By operating in Intel’s facilities, ACM could gain exposure to cutting-edge chipmaking processes that may materially improve the quality and competitiveness of

US lawmakers raise concerns about Intel’s testing of tools from China-linked firm

2026/03/05 11:49
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

WASHINGTON, USA – A bipartisan group of US lawmakers led by Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren and Republican Tom Cotton on Wednesday, March 4, raised national security concerns over Intel’s testing of chipmaking tools made by ACM Research, as first reported by Reuters.

ACM Research, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment, has deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions. Its customers include sanctioned Chinese companies such as YMTC and SMIC, sparking questions over whether ACM could pass sensitive information from Intel to Chinese customers, the lawmakers said.

“By operating in Intel’s facilities, ACM could gain exposure to cutting-edge chipmaking processes that may materially improve the quality and competitiveness of ACM and Chinese military companies,” the lawmakers said in a letter to Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan dated Wednesday.

Intel said in a statement that “ACM tools are not used in Intel’s semiconductor production processes,” adding that the company fully complies with US laws and regulations and engages regularly with the US government on security matters.

ACM did not immediately respond to a request for comment for this story.

The company previously said it could not comment on “specific customer engagements,” but said it has disclosed the shipment of three tools to a “major US-based semiconductor manufacturer,” which are being tested and some have met performance standards.

ACM said previously that it does not pose a national security threat, noting that its US operations are “bifurcated and isolated” from the sanctioned Shanghai-based unit, adding that US customers are supported directly by US personnel, with robust safeguards to protect customer trade secrets.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The letter, also signed by Democrats Elissa Slotkin and Andy Kim as well as Republicans Jim Banks and Pete Ricketts, is a sign of bipartisan concern about China’s growing role in US semiconductor manufacturing.

The House Selection Committee on China said in October it has “reviewed with concern reports that ACM Research… has sold (semiconductor manufacturing equipment) to a semiconductor manufacturer with US operations that also formally certified ACM Research’s tools for use in its production line.”

The lawmakers on Wednesday also noted that Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, faces unique responsibilities, since the US government now owns a stake in it.

“This raises important questions about Intel’s fiduciary responsibility and approach to safeguarding the public interest, including how the company benefits American economic interests and taxpayers,” they wrote.

“Intel’s entanglements with blacklisted Chinese companies calls into question whether taxpayer dollars are subsidizing activities that could directly threaten US national security and leadership in semiconductor manufacturing,” they added. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
AC Milan Fan Token Logo
AC Milan Fan Token Price(ACM)
$0,4393
$0,4393$0,4393
-%1,16
USD
AC Milan Fan Token (ACM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.