TLDR: Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulatedTLDR: Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulated

JELLYJELLY Rebounds 3x as Three Wallet Clusters Control 57% of Token Supply

TLDR:

  • Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply
  • Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulated primarily through Gate exchange platform
  • Token crashed 85% from $0.35 peak to current $0.07 level showing extreme volatility and risk factors
  • MACD shows bullish momentum building while DMI indicates weakening trend and market indecision ahead

JELLYJELLY has staged a remarkable recovery, climbing nearly three times from its bottom following an almost 90% decline from all-time highs. 

On-chain analysis reveals a concentrated supply structure where three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of total token circulation. 

This pattern mirrors previous observations in PIPPIN, suggesting insider coordination rather than organic market activity.

Coordinated Wallet Clusters Dominate Token Distribution

The largest cluster comprises top externally owned accounts that accumulated primarily through Gate exchange. 

These wallets collectively hold 326,226,487.04 JELLYJELLY tokens worth roughly $42.41 million. This group forms what analysts describe as the core supply backbone of the token’s market structure.

A second cluster consists of medium-sized accounts accumulating tokens from Bitget exchange. 

Together, these wallets control 141,078,919.70 JELLYJELLY valued at approximately $18.34 million. The coordinated accumulation pattern across different exchanges suggests planned activity rather than random retail participation.

The third cluster includes numerous smaller wallets sourcing tokens from Raydium decentralized exchange. 

Despite their size, these wallets display synchronized behavior that distinguishes them from typical retail traders. Combined, the three clusters hold 470,348,304.20 JELLYJELLY worth about $61.15 million.

Technical Indicators Show Mixed Signals Amid Extreme Volatility

Current trading data shows JELLYJELLY at $0.07022, representing a 36.10% decline from recent peaks. 

The token experienced a dramatic surge to approximately $0.35 in late October before crashing precipitously. Price action has since formed a consolidation base between $0.07 and $0.10.

The MACD indicator displays emerging bullish momentum as the blue line crosses above the signal line with green histogram bars appearing. 

Source: TradingView

This development suggests renewed buying interest despite the significant drawdown from peak levels. However, the Directional Movement Index shows ADX declining, indicating weakening overall trend strength.

Evening Trader Group’s analysis emphasizes that price movement depends primarily on whether controlling clusters choose to distribute their holdings. 

The DMI shows convergence between positive and negative directional indicators around the 30-50 range, reflecting market indecision. The 85% correction from peak levels underscores the extreme volatility characteristic of this asset class.

Market observers note the supply concentration creates conditions where price action depends more on insider decisions than on broader market fundamentals or narrative strength.

The post JELLYJELLY Rebounds 3x as Three Wallet Clusters Control 57% of Token Supply appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
jellyjelly Logo
jellyjelly Price(JELLYJELLY)
$0.074188
$0.074188$0.074188
-2.55%
USD
jellyjelly (JELLYJELLY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00