The post XRP Price Could Face Major Breakdown Before 2026 Arrives appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP is down about 1.6% over the past 24 hours. On the weeklyThe post XRP Price Could Face Major Breakdown Before 2026 Arrives appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP is down about 1.6% over the past 24 hours. On the weekly

XRP Price Could Face Major Breakdown Before 2026 Arrives

XRP is down about 1.6% over the past 24 hours. On the weekly chart, it remains one of the weaker large-cap movers, sitting roughly 16% lower than last month’s levels. Most of the price action is happening near the bottom of a descending triangle pattern, a structure that often leads to continuation moves.

This does not confirm a breakdown yet, but three market signals are lining up in a way that should make traders cautious heading into the final days of 2025.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Retail And Long-Term Holders Are Moving The Same Way

XRP is still stuck inside a descending triangle, trading flat near the lower trendline. Price trended higher between December 18 and December 27, but the Money Flow Index (MFI) moved the opposite way during that same period.

MFI tracks money entering or exiting the asset. A lower low in MFI while price rises suggests retail is selling into every bounce instead of accumulating.

That pressure keeps the XRP price pinned at the lower boundary of the pattern instead of testing the upper line.

Weak Retail Participation: TradingView

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

The concern grows when we zoom out to long-term holders.

According to HODL Waves, which visualizes how much supply is held by each age group, wallets holding XRP for 2–3 years dropped from 14.26% of supply on November 26 to about 5.66% on December 26.

Sponsored

Sponsored

These are long-term conviction holders, and their selling removes a layer of market support. Retail weakness is normal. Long-term weakness at the same time is not.

Holders Dumping XRP: Glassnode

This creates a setup where both short-term and long-term behavior are leaning in the same direction: out of XRP.

Capital Flow Shows Fading Demand

If retail and long-term conviction are weakening, the next check is capital flow, the third key sign.

Sponsored

Sponsored

The Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) is not providing relief either. CMF tracks buying and selling pressure based on volume and price movement. The large money flow indicator remains negative for XRP and is sliding along a descending support trendline.

Weak CMF: TradingView

In simpler terms, even if the price is flat, big capital entering the asset is thinning out, and the market is leaning toward supply overpowering demand. With no pickup yet in CMF, the market loses another potential safety net.

This is why the XRP price has remained flat rather than rebounding.

XRP Price Levels Decide If The Breakdown Actually Happens

For now, XRP is trapped between $1.90 and $1.81. It lost the $1.90 level on December 22 and hasn’t reclaimed it since. Reclaiming $1.90 and then pushing for $1.99 would be the first sign of strength.

Sponsored

Sponsored

That would also mark a move above the triangle’s upper boundary and give bulls something to work with.

However, the bearish case is clearer than the bullish one at present.

If $1.81 breaks, XRP may fall out of the descending triangle pattern, which would constitute a confirmed breakdown. That loss could open room toward $1.68, where the structure fully fails, and even $1.52 if selling accelerates.

XRP Price Analysis: TradingView

This isn’t a given yet, but the market has not shown a counter-signal yet. As long as retail selling, long-term distribution, and weakening capital inflow remain aligned, the XRP price must fight to hold the range.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/xrp-price-breakdown-risk-new-years/

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.8716
$1.8716$1.8716
+1.18%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

PANews reported on December 28 that, according to Lookonchain monitoring, two newly created wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC (US$13.5 million) from Binance in the past
Share
PANews2025/12/28 09:13
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
Musk expressed concern about the soaring price of silver.

Musk expressed concern about the soaring price of silver.

PANews reported on December 28th that Tesla CEO Elon Musk expressed concern about rising silver prices. He posted on the social media platform "X," stating, "This
Share
PANews2025/12/28 09:24