Former special counsel Jack Smith spoke to the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday where he clarified some details that Republicans have tried to use as talkingFormer special counsel Jack Smith spoke to the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday where he clarified some details that Republicans have tried to use as talking

Trump 'should be imprisoned': Critics react to Jack Smith testimony

2026/01/23 02:05
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Former special counsel Jack Smith spoke to the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday where he clarified some details that Republicans have tried to use as talking points against him.

Legal, analyst, reporters and commentators took to social media to attack the questioning of Smith.

"Republicans on House Judiciary don’t want answers from Jack Smith. They keep on interrupting him as he responds to their questions," said legal analyst Katie Phang.

"Jack Smith reminds us that the cases against Trump were dismissed 'without prejudice.' Meaning they could be brought again," legal analyst and podcast host Allison Gill, of @MuellerSheWrote pointed out.

National security analyst Marcy Wheeler cited Rep. "Hank Johnson still has it: While we're deposing Marshall Miller (the guy who got Jack Smith hired) perhaps we can depose Donald Trump why he hired his personal lawyer to run DOJ."

At one point, she noted, "So far Jack Smith is getting his a-- handed to him by the 5-minute rule and Dem ineffectiveness."

MS NOW producer Kyle Griffin pointed out a key quote from Smith: "Donald Trump was not looking for honest answers about whether there was fraud in the election. He was looking for ways to stay in power. And when people told him things that conflicted with him staying in power, he rejected them."

Reporter Adam Cochran wrote: "Rep Lofgren points out: * Most of Jack Smith’s case is built on the testimony of *REPUBLICANS* * As well as many of the Presidents closest allies in sworn testimony * Including @LindseyGrahamSC who said he told the President he lost, and that Trump would have blamed 'martians' for stealing the election."

Sociologist and educator Dr. DaShanne Stokes posted, "What we already knew, and what Jack Smith confirms, is that Trump is guilty of sedition, treason, incitement of violence, incitement of insurrection, an attempted coup, obstruction of justice, fraud, and election tampering. Trump remains ineligible to hold office and should be imprisoned."

Wheeler cited a comment from Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calf.) who claimed that multiple Republicans frequently trash Trump to Democrats behind closed doors. In one case, Swalwell said, "Matt Gaetz used to make fun of Trump on the Hill. [Swalwell] can't impugn his still-colleagues. But he can say stuff about disgraced former House member Gaetz."

New York Times reporter Glenn Thrush commented on Judiciary chairman, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who attacked Smith saying that the DOJ changed its policies about obtaining phone toll records about members of Congress.

"Context," wrote Thrush on X, "The Trump administration essentially scuttled the public integrity section — getting rid of all but 2-3 of its 35 prosecutors."

"Jim Jordan clearly doesn’t realize that Jack Smith is smarter, more honorable, and in better shape than he can ever even imagine being," remarked film and TV producer Franklin Leonard.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stablecoin market hits $312B as banks, card networks embrace onchain dollars

Stablecoin market hits $312B as banks, card networks embrace onchain dollars

Finance Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
Stablecoin market hits $312B as banks, card
Share
Coindesk2026/03/10 22:48
China Bans Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D Chip Amid AI Hardware Push

China Bans Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D Chip Amid AI Hardware Push

TLDR China instructs major firms to cancel orders for Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D chip. Nvidia shares drop 1.5% after China’s ban on key AI hardware. China accelerates development of domestic AI chips, reducing U.S. tech reliance. Crypto and AI sectors may seek alternatives due to limited Nvidia access in China. China has taken a bold [...] The post China Bans Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D Chip Amid AI Hardware Push appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 01:09