A long-inactive Bitcoin address moved millions in BTC after being targeted in a legal claim seeking ownership of thousands of dormant wallets. The post DormantA long-inactive Bitcoin address moved millions in BTC after being targeted in a legal claim seeking ownership of thousands of dormant wallets. The post Dormant

Dormant 2011 Bitcoin Wallet Awakens, Undercutting $285 Billion ‘Abandoned BTC’ Lawsuit

2026/06/09 15:20
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
  • A Bitcoin wallet dormant since 2011 transferred 35.55 BTC after being named in a New York lawsuit seeking ownership of allegedly abandoned wallets.
  • Plaintiffs claim legal title to roughly 3.8 million BTC across 39,069 addresses using New York’s lost-property laws.
  • The wallet’s activity prompted Galaxy Research’s Alex Thorn to argue the coins were not abandoned, while court proceedings have been paused until July.

A Bitcoin wallet holding 35.55 BTC has become one of the first addresses linked to a high-profile New York lawsuit to show activity after years of silence. The wallet transferred its funds on 2 June, with the holdings currently valued at approximately US$2.54 million (AU$3.53 million).

The address had not recorded any activity since receiving the coins in March 2011. Blockchain data indicates that 15 BTC was sent to a new destination, while 20.55 BTC was returned to the holder as change. At the time the coins were first received, Bitcoin traded for less than US$1 (AU$1.42)

The address is among thousands referenced in a lawsuit filed in New York state court. Plaintiffs Noah Doe, ABC Company and XYZ Company are seeking legal title to around 3.8 million BTC held across 39,069 dormant wallets. The claim places the value of those holdings at roughly US$285 billion (AU$396.15 billion). 

Related: Strategy’s Bitcoin Bet Faces $11.2B Paper Loss as BTC Drops Below Average Buy Price

Addresses Served Through Blockchain Messages 

As part of the legal process, the court authorised notices to be delivered through OP_RETURN messages recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain. According to reports, advisers acting for the plaintiffs sent 98 rounds of dust transactions containing notice links in June and July 2025. The wallet that later moved its coins received one of those notices on 31 July 2025.

Galaxy Research tracked the address as a defendant in the case. Following the transaction, head of research Alex Thorn wrote that the coins were “not, in fact, abandoned.” 

Separately, a New York court issued an order on 5 June pausing further proceedings in the lawsuit until a hearing on 14 July.

Related: Crypto-Fueled Peptide Boom Surges Past US$100M as Biohacking Meets Looksmaxxing

The post Dormant 2011 Bitcoin Wallet Awakens, Undercutting $285 Billion ‘Abandoned BTC’ Lawsuit appeared first on Crypto News Australia.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$62,694.21
$62,694.21$62,694.21
-1.69%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart

Predict & Trade to Win Rewards

Predict & Trade to Win RewardsPredict & Trade to Win Rewards

Guaranteed rewards with $500,000 prize pool

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Remaker AI Safe? Privacy, Deepfake Risks, and Copyright Issues

Is Remaker AI Safe? Privacy, Deepfake Risks, and Copyright Issues

The is Remaker AI safe question does not have a simple yes-or-no answer. The platform itself operates within standard industry norms, but the broader category of AI image and video tools introduces structural risks that exist independent of any specific platform's practices. This guide walks through the actual risk landscape, what users should verify before using AI tools that handle personal media, and how the broader internet — including Web3 — is starting to develop content provenance infrastructure to address the verification problem AI has created.
Share
MEXC NEWS2026/06/09 18:22
Is Remaker AI Free? Credits, Pricing, and Free Tools Explained

Is Remaker AI Free? Credits, Pricing, and Free Tools Explained

For users evaluating AI image and video tools, the first question is almost always about cost. Generative AI platforms have followed wildly different pricing models — some entirely free, some subscription-only, some hybrid credit systems — and understanding where a specific tool sits on this spectrum directly affects whether it fits your workflow.
Share
MEXC NEWS2026/06/09 18:05
How to Use Remaker AI: Beginner Tutorial for AI Images and Videos

How to Use Remaker AI: Beginner Tutorial for AI Images and Videos

Generative AI has compressed what was once specialized creative work — image generation, photo restoration, face swapping, video animation — into tools any beginner can use within minutes. Among the accessible platforms leading this shift, Remaker AI offers one of the gentlest learning curves in the AI tool landscape, with a browser-based interface that requires no install, no technical setup, and no design background.
Share
MEXC NEWS2026/06/09 18:26

RealStocks Now Live

RealStocks Now LiveRealStocks Now Live

Trade real U.S. stock via regulated brokerage