The post Vladimir Novakovski: DeFi must match traditional finance performance, why solving real-world problems is crucial, and the evolving role of Ethereum in The post Vladimir Novakovski: DeFi must match traditional finance performance, why solving real-world problems is crucial, and the evolving role of Ethereum in

Vladimir Novakovski: DeFi must match traditional finance performance, why solving real-world problems is crucial, and the evolving role of Ethereum in trading

DeFi must match the performance of traditional finance while maintaining verifiability. Building in crypto should focus on solving significant problems rather than building for its own sake. Most digital asset trading remains centralized, not utilizing blockchain technology.

Key takeaways

  • DeFi must match the performance of traditional finance while maintaining verifiability.
  • Building in crypto should focus on solving significant problems rather than building for its own sake.
  • Most digital asset trading remains centralized, not utilizing blockchain technology.
  • On-chain verifiable actions by intermediaries can improve efficiency over opaque traditional finance.
  • Perpetual contracts are favored by traders for their capital efficiency and leverage.
  • Customer feedback is crucial in tech development; starting with infrastructure alone is not effective.
  • Market dominance in perpetual exchanges shifts with each cycle.
  • The product market fit for DEXs was insufficient to attract traders post-FTX collapse.
  • Competition between centralized and decentralized exchanges will intensify over time.
  • Building on Ethereum is crucial for capturing the future of finance.
  • Solving hard technical problems first can lead to greater long-term benefits.
  • Ethereum’s connectivity and institutional use cases will see significant developments this year.
  • Building on Ethereum L2 offers better security and access to existing DeFi protocols.
  • The low latency of the trading system is achieved through an optimized sequencer.
  • Verifiability in trading systems ensures fairness and efficiency, especially during volatile markets.

Guest intro

Vladimir Novakovski is Founder and CEO of Lighter, a decentralized perpetual futures exchange built on Ethereum. Previously, he co-founded Lunchclub, an AI-powered networking platform, and spent nearly 15 years in engineering and trading roles at firms including Quora, Addepar, and Citadel. A Harvard graduate who entered at age 16, Novakovski has also established strategic partnerships with major platforms like Robinhood to expand Lighter’s reach in the crypto derivatives market.

DeFi challenges and goals

  • DeFi aims to perform at the same level as traditional finance without sacrificing verifiability.
  • “If we think about how does defi actually perform at the same level as tradfi without sacrificing kind of the verifiability” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The need for verifiability in financial systems is a critical challenge in DeFi.
  • Building in crypto should address significant problems, not just for the sake of building.
  • “It’s not like okay let’s like build in crypto for the sake of building crypto” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Solving real-world issues is a priority in the crypto space.
  • The philosophy behind innovation in crypto emphasizes meaningful contributions.
  • “Here’s actually a really important problem that puts together a lot of the building blocks that exist now” – Vladimir Novakovski

Centralized vs. decentralized trading

  • Most digital asset trading is centralized and does not utilize blockchain technology.
  • “99% of the way digital assets were traded didn’t actually use the rails of blockchain” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Centralized trading does not offer improvements over traditional finance.
  • On-chain verifiable actions by intermediaries can improve efficiency.
  • “If what they do is verifiable and is on chain that just makes things more efficient” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Perpetual contracts are more appealing for traders due to capital efficiency.
  • “Most active trading happens with perps… it makes sense when you think about it” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Understanding trading strategies is crucial for platform development.

The evolution of trading platforms

  • Building core technology without real customer feedback is ineffective.
  • “Without having that iteration where loop where you actually have like real customers using the tech” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The evolution of perpetual exchanges shows market dominance shifts with each cycle.
  • “Every cycle you have like one perps platform that kinda dominates” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • BitMEX, dYdX, and HyperLiquid have each dominated different cycles.
  • The cyclical nature of market dominance informs future strategies.
  • Understanding perpetual exchanges is key to navigating the crypto market.
  • Market dynamics in perpetual exchanges are constantly changing.

DEXs and market fit

  • The product market fit for DEXs was not strong enough post-FTX collapse.
  • “The product market fit for most traders at the time of being on a dex is just not there” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The collapse highlighted challenges in gaining market share for DEXs.
  • Competition between centralized and decentralized exchanges will intensify.
  • “The shift from cefi to defi will continue” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The evolving dynamics in the exchange market indicate a shift in trading preferences.
  • The competitive landscape between centralized and decentralized exchanges is changing.
  • Understanding trader preferences is crucial for DEXs to gain traction.

Ethereum’s role in finance

  • Building on Ethereum is essential for capturing the future of finance.
  • “Building on top of ethereum and being connected with the broader ecosystem” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Ethereum’s significance in the financial ecosystem is growing.
  • Solving hard technical problems first can lead to greater long-term benefits.
  • “If you solve the hard technical problems first then you get the bigger unlock later” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The strategic importance of Ethereum for financial innovations is emphasized.
  • Ethereum’s connectivity and institutional use cases will see significant developments.
  • “This year will be a lot of things will happen as far as unlocking the full connectivity to ethereum” – Vladimir Novakovski

Technical advantages and cost efficiency

  • The low latency of the trading system is achieved through an optimized sequencer.
  • “The low latency part is really important… the sequencer can be highly optimized” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The trading system processes 500 million orders a day at a cost of under $50,000.
  • “We’re processing 500,000,000 orders a day and the cost of doing all that are like under 50 k usd” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Verifiability in trading systems ensures fairness and efficiency.
  • “If trades are settled on chain but matching is done off chain in a way that’s not verifiable” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Operating costs on Ethereum L2 solutions are lower than centralized exchanges.
  • “Even centralized exchanges probably have a higher cost structure” – Vladimir Novakovski

Zero knowledge innovations

  • The unique combination of expertise in cryptography and quantitative analysis is crucial.
  • “We might be the only team that has both [cryptography and quant expertise]” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Zero knowledge circuits for finance are compared to specialized chips in hardware.
  • “We created zero knowledge circuits that are specifically for finance” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Efficiently encoding financial rules is a key feature of zero knowledge circuits.
  • “Our circuits can very efficiently encode the rules you need for finance” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The trade-off between optimization for trading efficiency and flexibility is acknowledged.
  • “There is a trade off there… for the trading you need to have the efficiency” – Vladimir Novakovski

Business model innovation and industry impact

  • Innovating business models can be powerful in changing an industry.
  • “Experimenting with the business model and not just keeping the status quo can be really powerful” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The idea of zero fees in trading was initially met with skepticism.
  • “When they had this idea of zero fees like no one thought that would work” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Early challenges faced by Robinhood highlight resistance to innovation.
  • The impact of Robinhood’s zero-fee model on the trading industry is significant.
  • Understanding the context of Robinhood’s model provides insights into industry shifts.
  • Innovation in business models reflects a significant industry shift.

Institutional integration with DeFi

  • Coinbase and Robinhood are exploring the integration of DeFi into their models.
  • “Coinbase… understand the power of defi moving over time from centralized rails to decentralized rails” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The strategic direction of major financial players indicates a shift towards DeFi.
  • Potential collaboration between DeFi innovators and traditional platforms is possible.
  • “They certainly wanna work closely with folks innovating in defi” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The evolving relationship between decentralized and centralized finance is crucial.
  • Understanding the integration of DeFi into traditional finance is key to future developments.
  • The financial landscape is being shaped by collaborations between DeFi and traditional platforms.

Institutional trading and regulatory challenges

  • Institutions are motivated to trade equities on platforms like Lighter.
  • “Institutions go where the retail is too… they wanna participate in as many markets as they can” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The biggest challenge for crypto-native trading shops is expertise in US equities.
  • “Crypto native trading shops… don’t have a lot of expertise in us equities” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Institutional players are hesitant to trade on DEXs due to regulatory concerns.
  • “Players that do have that expertise haven’t actively wanted to trade on dexs… because of regulation and compliance questions” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • On-chain KYC and compliance measures can facilitate institutional trading on DEXs.
  • “If you have this on chain kyc you can have certain rules around that” – Vladimir Novakovski

Technical alignment and project success

  • The technical stack must align with institutional needs for successful adoption.
  • “The alignment of the technical stack needs to be there… if there’s technical alignment and the tech actually works” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Many projects fail due to inadequate technology despite institutional relationships.
  • “There are some other projects that have a lot of institutional relationships but the tech there just doesn’t work” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Functional technology is crucial for the success of crypto projects.
  • Understanding the importance of technical reliability is key to fostering institutional trust.
  • The role of technical compatibility in crypto’s mainstream adoption is emphasized.
  • The success of crypto projects depends on both technology and institutional relationships.

Valuation and growth in the crypto market

  • The focus on revenue in crypto is important, but growth should also be considered.
  • “Crypto now looks at revenue but you should also look at growth” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Market reactions to revenue fluctuations reflect a shift in investor sentiment.
  • “Before the token launch… no one would freak out about lower revenue but now they do” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The Ethereum ecosystem should be viewed as a startup with growth potential.
  • “You have to think of it more as a startup… not like a public company that’s existed for twenty years” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • In acquisitions, acquiring entities need to buy up all tokens for value to accrue.
  • “The acquiring entity would have to buy up all the tokens” – Vladimir Novakovski

Traditional finance and crypto integration

  • Crypto native individuals often overlook the complexities of traditional finance.
  • “Tradfi institutions… a lot of crypto native people don’t understand” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • All capital markets are likely to transition onto blockchain technology.
  • “All capital markets are coming on chain… we won’t think about it as traditional capital markets and crypto capital markets” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • Institutional players recognize the value of blockchain technologies.
  • “On chain hedge funds… tokenized stocks… people in finance actually understand these technologies now” – Vladimir Novakovski
  • The integration of capital markets and blockchain highlights a significant trend.
  • Understanding the evolving relationship between traditional finance and blockchain is crucial.
  • The future of finance involves merging traditional and crypto markets.

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/vladimir-novakovski-defi-must-match-traditional-finance-performance-why-solving-real-world-problems-is-crucial-and-the-evolving-role-of-ethereum-in-trading-empire/

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000366
$0.000366$0.000366
-5.67%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Republic Europe Offers Indirect Kraken Stake via SPV

Republic Europe Offers Indirect Kraken Stake via SPV

Republic Europe launches SPV for European retail access to Kraken equity pre-IPO.
Share
bitcoininfonews2026/01/30 13:32
cpwrt Limited Positions Customer Support as a Strategic Growth Function

cpwrt Limited Positions Customer Support as a Strategic Growth Function

For many growing businesses, customer support is often viewed as a cost center rather than a strategic function. cpwrt limited challenges this perception by providing
Share
Techbullion2026/01/30 13:07
Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35