Nearly a decade after one of crypto’s most defining crises, unclaimed Ether from the 2016 hack of The DAO is being repurposed to support Ethereum’s security, revivingNearly a decade after one of crypto’s most defining crises, unclaimed Ether from the 2016 hack of The DAO is being repurposed to support Ethereum’s security, reviving

Ethereum’s $100M Ghost Fund Rises From the 2016 DAO Collapse — This Time Different?

Nearly a decade after one of crypto’s most defining crises, unclaimed Ether from the 2016 hack of The DAO is being repurposed to support Ethereum’s security, reviving a project whose collapse once threatened the network’s survival.

This time, its backers say, the goal is not experimentation but strengthening Ethereum’s defenses using resources left behind by the event that first exposed its vulnerabilities.

This week, Ethereum developer and longtime communal member Griff Green announced that hundreds of millions of dollars in Ether that went unclaimed following The DAO hack will be initiated into a new security-centered funding initiative.

Source: Unchained

In an appearance on the Unchained podcast, Green asserted that huge amounts of ETH are trapped in contracts that were made to compensate victims of the exploit, but they never actually claimed them.

Instead, he said, that money will now be used to generate a staking income and fund security work throughout the Ethereum ecosystem.

Inside the DAO Hack and Ethereum’s Historic Fork

In early 2016, the DAO was initiated as a decentralized venture capital, which permitted tokenholders to make decisions on a shared basis about the allocation of capital. It collected over $150 million in ETH, the biggest crowdfunding project at the time.

In June 2016, an attacker used a vulnerability in its smart contracts, called a reentrancy vulnerability, to empty its smart contracts of around 3.6 million ETH into a second contract.

The hack caused an existential crisis in Ethereum and a controversial hard fork that refunded most of the stolen money to the investors.

That ruling divided the community and formed two blockchains: Ethereum and Ethereum Classic.

While the fork restored the majority of funds, the recovery process was not clean. Green said around $6 million was set aside to handle complex cases involving investors who were unable to claim their ETH through standard mechanisms.

He joined a multisignature wallet established to manage those cases. Over time, more than 80% of that balance was claimed, but the remainder, now worth around $200 million at current prices, was left untouched.

DAO Hack Era Funds Revived for Network Security

According to Green, those unclaimed funds will form the backbone of what is being called The DAO Security Fund. The plan involves roughly 70,500 ETH held in an ExtraBalance Withdrawal contract, along with about 4,600 ETH and DAO tokens from the original curator multisig.

The capital will be staked, with yield directed toward funding security efforts rather than distributed as a one-time payout. The initiative is being coordinated alongside the Ethereum Foundation and aligns with its broader “Trillion Dollar Security” push.

Green said the fund will operate using decentralized allocation methods rather than top-down grants. Proposed mechanisms include quadratic funding, retroactive public goods funding, ranked-choice voting, and other DAO-style distribution models.

Oversight will involve well-known figures from the Ethereum security community, including Vitalik Buterin, MetaMask co-founder Taylor Monahan, Jordi Baylina, and members of the SEAL 911 response group.

Giveth, a public goods funding platform co-founded by Green, is also expected to play a role in administering allocations.

Ethereum’s Long Road From Early Hacks to Billion-Dollar DAOs

The move comes as Ethereum security has become a central concern for both developers and institutions.

The DAO hack itself helped give rise to the modern smart contract audit industry, which barely existed before 2016.

Since then, Ethereum has grown into the backbone of decentralized finance, NFTs, and tokenized assets, with billions of dollars regularly secured by smart contracts.

The revival of the DAO name also reflects how far decentralized governance has evolved since its early days.

By 2025, decentralized organizations collectively managed more than $24 billion in treasury assets, with major protocols like Uniswap, Arbitrum, and Optimism overseeing billion-dollar balances.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Escrow Amendment Gains Momentum, Set for February 2026 Activation

XRP Escrow Amendment Gains Momentum, Set for February 2026 Activation

TLDR The XRP Ledger’s Token Escrow amendment has gained 82.35% consensus and is set for activation on February 12, 2026. This amendment allows users to escrow a
Share
Coincentral2026/01/31 01:00
ZKP’s 300x Potential Takes Center Stage as XRP Price Shifts and Algorand News Turns Cautious

ZKP’s 300x Potential Takes Center Stage as XRP Price Shifts and Algorand News Turns Cautious

ZKP takes focus as XRP price tests a macro shift and Algorand news signals caution, reshaping views on structure and the best crypto to buy.
Share
Blockchainreporter2026/01/31 01:00