Polymarket Just Dropped Its Toughest Insider‑Trading Rules Yet – But Can They Really Calm DC?

Polymarket, the world’s largest prediction market, is rolling out new safeguards against insider trading and manipulation.

Polymarket’s Most Recent Bet

The pressure generated from the growing scrutiny that prediction markets have come under as of late seems to have done the trick. Polymarket updated its rules on Monday and shortly after, Kalshi, its main competitor, announced new guardrails that preemptively block politicians, candidates and sports insiders from trading on related markets, Bloomberg claims.

Neal Kumar, Polymarket’s chief legal officer, said in a statement that the goal of this update to the rulebook is clarifying the expectations they have for the users. “Markets thrive on clarity”, he claims:

The timing is not casual. Also on Monday, Senators Adam Schiff (D-CA) and John Curtis (R-UT) introduced a bipartisan Senate bill targeting sports‑style bets on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, after a string of “suspiciously well‑timed” trades. The Senate concerns go beyond the law, citing the surge of gambling culture promoted by online betting can easily lead to addiction.

Polymarket updated its Terms of Use and U.S. Rulebook with enhanced “market integrity” rules across both its DeFi platform and CFTC‑regulated U.S. exchange. The new language explicitly bans trading on stolen or confidential information when using it would violate a duty of trust or confidence (classic insider‑trading standard). It also prohibits trading on illegal tips, where a user knows or should know the person sharing the information is themselves barred from trading on it. Additionally, users who can influence the outcome of a bet, such as government officials, corporate executives, or athletes tied to the event, are barred from trading on related contracts.

The rulebook also spells out broader manipulation bans, including spoofing, wash trading, fictitious transactions, front‑running, self‑dealing and other disruptive practices. The dedicated “Market Integrity” provide tools to report suspicious activity across both platforms, highlighting a multi‑layer surveillance and enforcement framework that combines automated monitoring with human review to flag and investigate questionable trades.

Similarly, on its side, Kalshi announced expanded “guardrails” against insider trading and market manipulation, framed as a response to CFTC guidance and the latest congressional proposals. The exchange is rolling out technological screens that aim to preemptively block politicians, political candidates and campaign insiders from trading on their own races. Similar screens will bar athletes and other “relevant people”, like team staff, league insiders and other connected personnel, from trading in sports markets they are involved with.

Prediction markets have exploded into a multi‑billion‑dollar venue for trading politics and sports, but that scale brought CFTC scrutiny, state‑level pushback and now congressional bills aimed squarely at their growth engines. Some of the critiques show valid ethic concerns. Let’s not forget that not too long ago, Argentinian authorities ordered a full national ban of Polymarket after it “predicted” inflation data back in February. On top of that, the platform faced terrible backlash recently after bettors sent death threats to Times of Israel military reporter Emanuel Fabian, following his report of an Iranian ballistic missile on March 10.

Polymarket and Kalshi are now racing to build compliance as a moat: whoever convinces regulators first may become the default institutional on‑ramp, while weaker venues risk being regulated into the ground. Traders can expect tighter KYC/surveillance and less tolerance for “edge” based on non‑public info.

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSDT chart from Tradingview