Who is the biggest winner in this wave of stablecoin craze?

2025/07/22 19:00

Author: Yue Xiaoyu

With the listing of Circle, the leader in compliant stablecoins, a benchmark effect has been created, and domestic investors have also begun to pay attention to stablecoins.

Various stablecoin payment conferences are emerging one after another, and companies are organizing various learning activities. Of course, the cryptocurrency community is also actively discussing it, and great scholars are debating it.

Behind all the excitement, who is actually making money right now?

In fact, according to the overall process, the development of stablecoins can be divided into three stages, and different roles can make money in these three stages.

Who is the biggest winner in this wave of stablecoin craze?

The first stage is to apply for a license.

Compliance comes first, and everyone is currently applying for a license in Hong Kong.

The biggest problem with Hong Kong's regulation is that it is too strict and has too many requirements. Many companies don't know how to meet the regulatory requirements.

At this time, law firms jumped out to provide legal consulting services to companies applying for licenses, helping them submit materials and communicate with regulators.

So at this stage, the law firm made money first.

The second stage is to build technology.

Compliance and technology can go hand in hand. Many companies apply for licenses while building technical systems. Once the license is approved, they can immediately launch their own stablecoins and seize the initiative.

If you wait until the license is issued before starting the project, you will miss the time window and it will be too late.

It is quite complicated to do stablecoin payments, which requires compliance services, asset management services, token issuance services, liquidity management services, security services, etc.

Specifically including KYB, KYT, AML, order management, address management, clearing and settlement, deposits and withdrawals, contract audits, on-chain security, etc.

However, traditional Web2 companies actually lack relevant experience and talent in blockchain development, so they need to cooperate with Web3 technology service companies.

Therefore, at this stage, many Crypto technology service providers also began to attract customers and directly obtained income.

The third stage is channel promotion.

If you have a license and the technology is in place, you can start your business directly.

However, at present, most companies are still in the first and second stages, and the third stage is at most in the negotiation stage.

But once the business is launched, it will be a "hundred-coin war".

For stablecoins, liquidity is the core.

Various stablecoins need to find their own business scenarios and expand their scale of use.

Then channel promotion is very important, and we need to find large-scale channels to cooperate with.

A typical example is Circle. The rapid rise of USDC is mainly due to the liquidity and brand endorsement provided by Coinbase's strong support.

This is a clear development path. For Hong Kong stablecoin players, they must also bind various channels to seize the market.

Well, in this stage of the Hundred Coins War, the most profitable channels are naturally various channels, including exchanges, e-commerce platforms, cross-border trading companies, etc.

After going through the above three stages, the stablecoin that finally emerges can really make money.

Eventually, a stablecoin will emerge and become the leader in Hong Kong or the Chinese region. It will squeeze the space of other competitors and gain the majority of market share through the siphon effect.

After having a solid market share, the next step is naturally to increase profits, and this is when stablecoin issuers make money.

Looking at the domestic taxi wars, shared bike wars, and food delivery wars, they all follow this path.

It’s a melee at the beginning, and the player who emerges victorious at the end will take all. Moreover, after the subsidy war, they need to recuperate, reduce subsidies and increase unit prices in order to make a profit.

At this time, the profits are also very terrifying, and the stablecoin issuers themselves can only make profits by relying on huge amounts of assets.

In addition to various project parties, for ordinary users, the more direct benefit is that when the new stablecoin forces seize the market and liquidity through subsidies, we retail investors can also arbitrage from it.

In short, the stablecoin craze can be said to be "big fish in big waters", and we must grab our own piece of the pie.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Bitcoin Miner Mawson Fires CEO, Files Fraud Lawsuit – What’s Going On?

Bitcoin Miner Mawson Fires CEO, Files Fraud Lawsuit – What’s Going On?

Key Takeaways: Mewawalla’s dismissal follows broader scrutiny of executive pay practices in crypto infrastructure firms. The lawsuit marks Mawson’s second major legal dispute in 2025, both linked to operational asset control. Canaan’s ongoing expansion at Mawson’s site continues despite parallel litigation. Bitcoin miner Mawson Infrastructure has fired its CEO and President, Rahul Mewawalla, for cause, accusing him of breaching fiduciary duties and engaging in fraud. According to TheMinerMag , the board placed Mewawalla on administrative leave shortly after notifying him of potential termination on May 30. By July 8, his removal became official. Bitcoin Miner Mawson Sues Ex-CEO Mawson has also filed a lawsuit in Delaware’s Court of Chancery seeking damages and the return of compensation awarded earlier this year. In February, the board approved a $2.5 million cash bonus, 1.2 million restricted stock units, and a salary increase to $1.2 million for Mewawalla. The company cited “high-performing” leadership in that announcement. In a July 17 letter to Mawson’s board, Mewawalla disputed the accusations, stating he “respectfully and vigorously” disagreed with the company’s account. He referred to the board’s own prior filings, which credited him with 36% revenue growth and improved gross margins during his tenure. The company named General Counsel Kaliste Saloom as interim CEO. Mewawalla’s board seat has also been revoked. The lawsuit filed against Mewawalla has not yet been made public, and the company has not released further details about the specific misconduct alleged. Mewawalla has not publicly responded beyond his letter to the board. 🔋 AI firms are now using excess data center power to mine Bitcoin, helping to stabilize grids and improve energy efficiency. #Bitcoin #Mining #AI #RenewableEnergy https://t.co/8ZnTfdRETq — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) July 11, 2025 Second Legal Dispute in 2025 The complaint marks the second major legal dispute involving Mawson this year. In March, NYDIG’s parent company, Stone Ridge, and its mining subsidiary, Consensus Colocation, sued Mawson for allegedly taking control of 20,000 ASIC miners worth $30 million hosted at a facility in Midland, Pennsylvania. Mawson has since signed a new agreement with Canaan to host over 17,000 new units at the same Midland site. The three-year deal includes approximately 64 megawatts of capacity and supports Canaan’s 4.7 EH/s hashrate expansion in North America. The leadership change comes as the mining firm seeks to stabilize operations and attract partners in a competitive colocation market. Pending legal outcomes may influence future contractual relationships and financing terms. The incident reveals ongoing governance challenges in the crypto mining sector, where executive pay and accountability remain under heightened scrutiny. Boards may face increased pressure to justify incentive structures and enforce oversight mechanisms in such a volatile environment. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What role does fiduciary duty play in crypto-native firms with hybrid operational models? In companies operating both infrastructure and financial services, fiduciary obligations may cover both traditional shareholders and tokenholders, adding complexity to governance enforcement and dispute resolution. How might this affect Mawson’s ability to secure future equipment or hosting partnerships? Ongoing legal disputes and leadership changes can raise counterparty risk concerns. Equipment manufacturers and hosting partners may renegotiate terms or delay new agreements pending resolution. Could regulatory agencies get involved? While the current proceedings are civil, if fraud is substantiated, state or federal regulators may initiate separate enforcement action depending on the facts.
Share
CryptoNews2025/07/23 00:48