Shiba Inu price drops amid $100m open interest exodus: what’s next?

2025/07/31 04:37

SHIB’s open interest just shed over $100 million in days, marking one of its steepest pullbacks since mid-July, after briefly peaking at $328 million. With Shibarium’s TVL dwindling and broader memecoin sentiment cooling, traders are questioning whether burns alone can reignite momentum.

Summary
  • Shiba Inu price fell nearly 9% this week amid a $100 million drop in open interest.
  • Shibarium’s total value locked sank to $1.76 million, down over 70% from late 2023.
  • The memecoin’s reliance on token burns is being tested as market preferences shift toward utility-driven projects.

On July 30, Shiba Inu’s (SHIB) price slid to $0.00001266, marking a nearly 5% drop in 24 hours and extending its weekly losses to 9%. The decline coincided with a sharp $100 million withdrawal from SHIB’s open interest, a key metric tracking active derivatives positions, as traders rapidly unwound bets on the memecoin’s near-term upside.

Data from Coinglass reveals open interest plummeted from $328 million on July 22 to just $206 million, signaling one of the most aggressive pullbacks since mid-July. Meanwhile, Shibarium, the layer-2 network meant to bolster SHIB’s utility, saw its total value locked sink to $1.76 million, a fraction of its late-2023 peak.

The deeper pressures behind Shiba Inu’s price decline

The $100 million open interest drop can be seen as a vote of no confidence in SHIB’s near-term prospects. It signals that market participants are either cashing out or refusing to open new positions, anticipating further downside.

In SHIB’s case, the rapid unwinding suggests traders no longer see the memecoin as a viable short-term play, despite its 10% monthly gain. This skepticism is compounded by Shibarium’s struggles; the layer-2 solution, once touted as SHIB’s bridge to real-world utility, has seen its TVL erode by over 70% since December 2023.

The shrinking TVL is particularly concerning because it reveals a lack of developer and user engagement with Shibarium. Total value locked represents the assets actively being used within a blockchain’s ecosystem, whether for staking, lending, or decentralized applications. A declining TVL implies that capital is migrating elsewhere, often to platforms offering stronger incentives or clearer utility.

Compounding these issues is SHIB’s staggering 85% deficit from its all-time high. While some might dismiss this as typical memecoin volatility, the broader market context paints a more nuanced picture.

Unlike 2021, when speculative mania could buoy any asset with a catchy mascot, today’s investors are prioritizing fundamentals, whether that’s Ethereum’s layer-2 adoption, Solana’s high-speed trading infrastructure, or even newer memecoins with more aggressive tokenomics. Shiba Inu’s reliance on burns, while initially effective, now appears insufficient to counteract this shift.

After all, reducing supply only matters if demand persists, and right now, the market seems to be saying that scarcity alone isn’t enough. The next few months will be critical in determining whether it can evolve or if the market has simply moved on.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Bitcoin Mining Goes Institutional – But Can It Survive Tariffs, AI Grid Wars, and Fee Collapse?

Bitcoin Mining Goes Institutional – But Can It Survive Tariffs, AI Grid Wars, and Fee Collapse?

In 2025, Bitcoin mining is no longer just a competition over hashpower and block rewards—it has evolved into a full-scale infrastructure war, where access to energy, geopolitical positioning, and integration with emerging technologies like AI define who survives and who fades out. According to the newly released Bitcoin Mining Market Review and Key Trends authored by Nico Smid, research analyst at GoMining Institutional, and Fakhul Miah, managing director at GoMining Institutional, the industry now finds itself locked in a struggle with one of the world’s fastest-growing tech verticals: artificial intelligence. AI hyperscalers are demanding huge amounts of electricity for model training and deployment, putting them on a direct collision course with Bitcoin miners, who also rely on affordable, high-volume power to remain profitable. This competition has triggered what the report calls a “power crunch,” forcing mining companies to rethink site selection, energy procurement, and geopolitical risk in real time. The competition for electricity is no longer limited to internal mining rivalries—it has gone external. Major players like Riot Platforms have paused a 600 MW expansion, while Iris Energy has shifted away from pure BTC mining to allocate capacity toward AI cloud services. On February 13, Riot Platforms also anno unced that it is actively pursuing potential partnerships within the AI and HPC sectors. 💡 Bitcoin miner @RiotPlatforms eyes AI and HPC as Bitcoin transactions slump. #Bitcoin #AI #Mining https://t.co/9lab9MJy32 — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) February 13, 2025 As nations attempt to balance power grids and prioritize forward-looking technologies, miners are being priced out, regulated against, or simply pushed aside, claims the report. Institutional Capital Pours in, but Miners Are Squeezed The report notes that this crunch comes at a time when institutional demand for Bitcoin has never been higher. Wall Street has poured billions into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs , and the U.S. government has officially recognized the asset by forming a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The result is a paradox: demand for Bitcoin is soaring, but the supply-side infrastructure—mining—is becoming more fragile. While capital floods into ETFs, miners face rising operating costs, compressed fees, and restricted energy access. Hash price has declined sharply post-halving, and transaction fee revenue has collapsed to less than 1% of miner income. Even as Bitcoin becomes more embedded in institutional portfolios and public balance sheets, the ability to mint new coins is under siege. This growing disconnect between Bitcoin’s financialization and the economic sustainability of mining is one of the report’s core warnings. Miners Turn to Financial Engineering to Survive To survive this high-cost, post-halving environment, miners are evolving into financial tacticians. No longer just hardware operators, leading firms are now using Bitcoin-backed loans, convertible notes, and creative equity structures to raise capital without liquidating their BTC reserves. The report identifies this trend as “the rise of the financially engineered miner,” where the ability to model capital stack scenarios is as important as mining efficiency. The shift marks a turning point in how mining companies operate. Access to energy is still paramount, but access to capital markets—and the sophistication to operate within them—is now equally essential. As mining companies adapt to lower margins and greater volatility, their financial survival may hinge on how well they can balance debt, equity, and retained BTC while preparing for further pressure from AI, regulation, and tariffs. Legacy Hardware Feels the Pain The report also shines a light on the economic pressure facing legacy ASIC hardware. The S19 generation of miners, which still accounts for roughly 25% of Bitcoin’s total hashrate, is fast approaching obsolescence. Profitability data shows that S19 units operating at electricity costs above $0.06/kWh are already unprofitable unless the hash price exceeds $60—a rarity in 2025. For operators paying more than $0.05/kWh, even slight hash price drops can push them into the red. While the S19 has been a workhorse since its release five years ago, it is now a liability for many mining farms. The narrowing profit margins are an indicator of how quickly economic viability can shift, particularly in an industry facing both internal halving events and external competition from AI infrastructure players, GoMining Institutional reports. Outlook: More Than Just Block Rewards The report concludes that the first half of 2025 has revealed that Bitcoin mining is no longer a closed system. It’s now a frontline industry operating at the intersection of capital, energy, and compute. As the network seeks equilibrium after April’s halving, miners must make tough decisions about scale, strategy, and survival. The second half of the year promises no less intensity—but the winners will be those who can work within capital markets as well as they can manage hashpower.
Share
CryptoNews2025/08/01 00:52