Trump Administration Wants Comments On Controversial Rule Governing Access To Consumer Financial Data

Russell Vought, the acting head of the CFPB.

AFP via Getty Images

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is asking stakeholders for their input before it reworks an open banking rule governing access to consumer financial data. The battle between fintechs and banking incumbents intensified last month as the nation’s largest bank, JPMorgan, announced it would impose hefty fees for data access, with other banks contemplating similar moves to stave off rising competition by the fintech industry.

Just yesterday, the CFPB raised a total of 36 questions in the solicitation document it submitted to the Federal Register’s public inspection division. Under consideration, are questions as to who should have the authority to make data requests on behalf of consumers, how best to safeguard consumer data and who should cover the costs associated with data transfers to fintechs. The agency also requests guidance on a suitable price cap for fees, should they decide that banks be allowed to charge for consumer data access.

The agency’s questions around bank fees for the access and transfer of consumer financial information are expected to be formally published today in the Federal Register. The published document will set in motion a 60-day comment period during which banks, data aggregators and fintechs are invited to contribute to the discussion on the open banking rule and help revise it.

This latest filing marks the first step in the CFPB’s plan to rewrite the open banking regulations, after its motion to do so was approved last month by a federal judge.

Under the original open banking rule finalized by the Biden administration in October 2024 and set to take effect next year, customers would’ve been able to access and share financial information tied to their bank accounts with fintechs and other third parties without incurring a fee.

Since the early days of the fintech industry, startups such as Chime, Stripe and Robinhood have required access to consumers’ bank data for tasks like transferring money and wealth management services. Data aggregators such as Plaid and MX have often acted as an intermediary that charges fintechs for bank data access.

Banking lobbying groups immediately sued to strike down the Biden administration’s October 2024 rule. Soon after, the Financial Technology Association (FTA), a DC-based trade organization, was granted permission to join the litigation to uphold the regulations.

The FTA, which has agreed to participate in the rulemaking process, released a statement on Thursday calling the CFPB’s request for comments “an opportunity to stand up for Americans’ rights to access innovation and control their financial data without unfair roadblocks.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/juliegoldenberg/2025/08/22/trump-administration-wants-comments-on-controversial-rule-governing-access-to-consumer-financial-data/

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Securing Ethereum’s Base Layer Neutrality

Securing Ethereum’s Base Layer Neutrality

The post Securing Ethereum’s Base Layer Neutrality appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In the fast-evolving world of cryptocurrency, maintaining the core principles of decentralization is absolutely vital. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently shared his insightful thoughts on safeguarding Ethereum base layer neutrality. He warned against the dangers of excessive centralization in block production, a topic crucial for the network’s future. Buterin’s vision emphasizes a robust defense strategy to keep Ethereum’s foundation fair and open for everyone. This isn’t just about preventing bad actors; it’s about building a system that can withstand future challenges and ensure true decentralization. Why is Ethereum Base Layer Neutrality So Important? The base layer of any blockchain is its fundamental infrastructure. If this layer becomes centralized, even slightly, it opens the door to potential censorship, manipulation, and a loss of the very trustless nature that cryptocurrencies promise. Buterin understands this deeply, and his recent post on X (formerly Twitter) outlined three key defenses to protect this crucial aspect: Strengthening the Public Mempool: Imagine a public waiting room for all transactions. Buterin advocates for making this mempool so strong that blocks can be built without relying on any single, centralized entity. This ensures that everyone’s transactions have a fair chance of being included. Developing Distributed Block-Building Technology: Instead of a few large players building most blocks, this approach aims to spread the block-building process across many participants. This makes it much harder for any single group to gain too much control. Introducing Additional Inclusion Channels: Even if a small number of professional builders dominate block production, there should be alternative ways to guarantee your transaction gets included. This acts as a safety net against potential censorship. These strategies collectively aim to make the network more resilient and ensure that Ethereum base layer neutrality remains a cornerstone of its design. How Will Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL) Help? One of…
Partager
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/08/23 10:48
Partager