On-chain analyst Ali Martinez says whales offloaded ~200 million XRP in two weeks. Traders are parsing the transfers as XRP holds near $3.On-chain analyst Ali Martinez says whales offloaded ~200 million XRP in two weeks. Traders are parsing the transfers as XRP holds near $3.

XRP Whales Offload 200 Million XRP as Market Pauses Near $3

2025/09/18 03:20
xrp123213

A single tweet from on-chain analyst Ali Martinez set traders digging through ledger transfers this week. “Whales have offloaded around 200 million $XRP in the last two weeks,” he wrote, and the claim immediately refocused attention on where large holders were moving their coins.

On spot markets, XRP has largely been treading water near the $3.00 area as traders try to figure out whether the big transfers were profit-taking or the start of something bigger. Volume has stayed lively, which suggests there’s real activity behind the headline, but not yet a clear directional conviction.

Digging into the numbers shows why people are debating the significance. Different on-chain trackers and analytics firms classify “whales” in different ways. Some dashboards put the recent big transfers closer to 160 million XRP over the same fortnight, while other analyses, depending on how they cluster wallets or treat exchange vs. self-custodied moves, flag even larger cumulative flows.

In short, the exact count varies, but the takeaway is the same: significant tokens changed hands. Technically, that kind of distribution can slow a rally. Market commentators warned that if selling pressure continues, XRP could revisit lower supports in the $2.40–$2.80 band. On the flip side, reclaiming resistance around $3.10–$3.15 would calm nervous traders and signal buyers are stepping back in.

Context Matters

XRP has seen renewed interest from both retail and institutional corners this year, and some investors point to broader macro tailwinds, such as softer rate expectations, that could buoy crypto markets more generally. That makes it plausible the whale moves were merely short-term profit taking rather than the start of a structural decline.

What traders are watching next is straightforward. Where did those XRP land? If large transfers ended up on exchanges and quickly converted to fiat or stablecoins, selling pressure could build. If instead coins moved into cold wallets, that would look more like redistribution or long-term stacking. Spot and derivatives open interest will also be closely monitored for signs of liquidations or fresh leveraged flows.

For now, the picture is mixed. Martinez’s tweet was a reminder that big players still matter in crypto, but it’s the follow-through on price and on-chain flows that will tell the full story. Traders will likely keep a close eye on the $3 level and the next set of on-chain data for clearer direction.

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

No L2s, No Mass Adoption. Period.

No L2s, No Mass Adoption. Period.

ETH Can’t Do It Alone ETH mainnet is powerful but let’s be honest, it’s pricey AF. $50 swaps, $100 NFT mints. Perfect for whales flexing, useless for billions of everyday users. That’s why Layer 2s (L2s) exist. They’re Ethereum’s highways: same security, but faster and dirt cheap. No L2s = crypto stays niche. With them, ETH finally goes global. Why Ethereum Alone Can’t Scale 2021 gas fees were brutal. People spent rent money on swaps. NFT mints sometimes cost more than the art. Ethereum nailed security, but it was locked behind insane fees. Rollups solved that by bundling transactions, compressing data, and anchoring it back to Ethereum. Think of ETH as the courthouse. L2s are the highways around it. Same rules, way more traffic can flow. Rollups Two main flavors run the show: Optimistic Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism): “Innocent until proven guilty.” Transactions go through unless someone proves fraud. Efficient, but withdrawals to mainnet take ~7 days. ZK Rollups (zkSync, Starknet, Scroll): “Math doesn’t lie.” Validity is proved upfront with cryptography. Harder tech, but faster and more secure. Either way → fees drop from $20 to cents. That’s the unlock. Why L2s Matter for Mass Adoption Mass adoption = billions of cheap, everyday transactions. That’s impossible on L1, but normal on L2. DeFi: Swapping $50 shouldn’t cost $20. On L2s, anyone can farm, lend, and trade. Gaming + NFTs: $5 skins, collectibles, and in-game items actually make sense. SocialFi: Billions of likes, tips, and posts daily. Reddit already runs Community Points on Arbitrum Nova. Without L2s, Ethereum is boutique. With them, it becomes global infrastructure. It’s Already Happening Arbitrum: The DeFi king. GMX, Radiant, Uniswap all live here. Nova powers gaming + social. The BoLD upgrade decentralizes validation. Optimism: Playing the meta game. The OP Stack lets anyone spin up an L2. Coinbase’s Base, Zora, Worldcoin all sparks from the same match. Together = the Superchain. ZK Rollups: zkSync, Starknet, Scroll are still early, but building for instant, trustless scaling. Then came Dencun (2024). Ethereum introduced blobs, slashing L2 fees by ~95%. Overnight, “cheap” became “basically free.” The Messy Bits 👀 L2s are the backbone, but they’re not perfect: Sequencers = Central chokepoints. Today, one operator orders all transactions. Risk of censorship + MEV capture is real. Optimism is testing “shared sequencers.” Espresso + Astria are building neutral ones. Bridges = Speed vs. trust. Optimistic rollups force a 7 day wait. Fast bridges fix UX but add risk over $2B lost in hacks shows the danger. ZK rollups may cut this, but proofs are still heavy. Liquidity = Fragmentation risk. Superchain sounds , but liquidity could scatter across 20 OP chains. Imagine Uniswap split across Base, Zora, Optimism. Without cross-chain messaging, composability breaks. Governance = Growing pains. Arbitrum DAO controls ~$3B, but drama over 750M ARB transfers showed fragility. Optimism’s RetroPGF funds public goods after impact bold but unproven long term. The Road Ahead For L2s to truly onboard billions, three things must click: Decentralized Sequencers → no single chokepoint. Seamless Interop → bridging feels invisible. Invisible UX → normies don’t care what chain they’re on. When that happens, no one says “I bridged to Arbitrum.” They just say: “I sent crypto. It was instant. It was cheap.” Final Take Ethereum is the air. Without it, nothing runs. L2s are the engines. They move the people, the culture, the transactions. No L2s = crypto stays niche. With L2s = we onboard billions. They’re not a side quest. They’re the backbone of Ethereum’s future. Period. Key Takeaways Ethereum is secure but too expensive to scale alone. L2s bundle transactions and slash fees by 95%+. Arbitrum leads DeFi today, while Optimism builds the Superchain for tomorrow. ZK rollups are early but promise instant security at scale. Main challenges: sequencer centralization, bridge risks, liquidity fragmentation, DAO politics. Long-term success depends on decentralization, interop, and invisible UX. Bottom line: No L2s, no mass adoption. With them, Ethereum scales to billions. No L2s, No Mass Adoption. Period. was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Partager
Medium2025/09/22 15:18
Partager