Justice Clarence Thomas's eyebrow-raising birthright citizenship dissent on Tuesday became the topic of discussion on MS NOW, with one anchor describing it as "Justice Clarence Thomas's eyebrow-raising birthright citizenship dissent on Tuesday became the topic of discussion on MS NOW, with one anchor describing it as "

Clarence Thomas' 'astonishing' birthright citizenship dissent leaves MS NOW aghast

2026/06/30 23:57
2분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락주시기 바랍니다

Justice Clarence Thomas's eyebrow-raising birthright citizenship dissent on Tuesday became the topic of discussion on MS NOW, with one anchor describing it as "astonishing" and legal analyst Lisa Rubin calling it "disappointing."

"Astonishing may be the wrong word; I think disappointing maybe another word," Rubin said, telling viewers the dissent was "certainly predictable, based on oral argument."

Clarence Thomas' 'astonishing' birthright citizenship dissent leaves MS NOW aghast

The exchange came moments after the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship in Trump v. Barbara, a 6-3 ruling that struck down President Donald Trump's executive order. The anchor had turned to Rubin to unpack Thomas's "astonishing" reasoning. Rubin's answer reframed the dissent as a letdown, but unsurprising.

What disappointed her was the line Thomas drew, and where it came from. Rubin said Thomas was "picking up a thread that Solicitor General John Sauer left for him," and later that he was "taking the bait" — drawing a distinction between Black Americans and the children of what he called "foreign temporary visitors." In his dissent, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, Thomas argued the 14th Amendment was written to confer citizenship on the children of slaves, not on temporary visitors' children, reaching back to the Dred Scott decision and quoting Frederick Douglass to build it.

She predicted it would not land with the people it claims to honor.

"This is a distinction that large swaths of the civil rights movement will not accept," Rubin said, pointing to decades of shared organizing between the NAACP and immigrant rights groups.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, joined by the court's three liberal justices and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, holding that children born in the United States to parents here unlawfully or temporarily are citizens at birth. Justices Thomas, Samuel Alito and Gorsuch dissented.

The decision ends a fight that immigration scholars had long argued rested on a shaky reading of 14th Amendment history.

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200xWorld Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

Combine up to 20 World Cup matches in one order

면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.