Key Insights Pseudonymous Onchain investigator ZachXBT has accused stablecoin issuer Circle of compliance failures. In a thread on X (formerly Twitter), ZachXBTKey Insights Pseudonymous Onchain investigator ZachXBT has accused stablecoin issuer Circle of compliance failures. In a thread on X (formerly Twitter), ZachXBT

ZachXBT Alleges a $420 Million Compliance Failure at Circle Since 2022

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Key Insights

  • ZachXBT claims Circle’s failure to promptly freeze illicit funds in USDC has led to a $420 million loss.
  • The onchain investigator outlined 15 cases where Circle delayed freezing illicit funds.
  • He has called for the stablecoin issuer to do better.

Pseudonymous Onchain investigator ZachXBT has accused stablecoin issuer Circle of compliance failures. In a thread on X (formerly Twitter), ZachXBT listed 15 cases where Circle delayed freezing stolen USDC.

According to him, this enabled bad actors to successfully move over $420 million in funds that could have been frozen if Circle had acted fast.

ZachXBT Says Circle Too Slow with Freezing Illicit Funds

The post from the onchain investigator appears to have been triggered by the recent Drift Protocol hack. The Solana-based decentralized exchange was recently exploited, with over $280 million stolen in an incident linked to North Korea hacker groups.

However, ZachXBT believes some of the stolen funds could have been frozen if Circle had acted. According to him, the hackers used Circle CCTP to bridge 232 million USDC from Solana to Ethereum. This took more than six hours across 100+ transactions.

Source: XSource: X

He wrote:

“Despite the attacker laundering funds over six consecutive hours across Circle’s own native bridge, no USDC was frozen.”

The onchain sleuth highlighted 14 other incidents in which the exploiter used USDC to launder funds. These include the Cetus Protocol exploit last year, where $223 milion was stolen, and the $110 milion hack of Mango Markets in 2022.

In these three cases and others, ZachXBT showed a pattern of Circle failing to freeze funds and blacklist wallets in a timely manner, even when requested by law enforcement.

A report in 2024 highlighted this, noting that when law enforcement submitted freeze requests to  Circle, Tether, Paxos, and Techteryx for two addresses in relation to the report. The others acted prompted while it took 4.5 months longer before it froze the addresses.

ZachXBT Wants Circle to do Better

Meanwhile, the pseudonymous investigator noted that criticisms of Circle stem from his desire to see the stablecoin issuer fail. He acknowledged that the company has good products, and he also holds USDC.

However, he is calling for a change in its compliance process due to the negative impacts on the ecosystem. He noted that Circle is registered and licensed in the US, and that the company has the resources to do better, given the real-life consequences of its decisions.

He wrote:

“Nine figures lost from the ecosystem because of repeated inaction across three years, law enforcement requests, private sector requests, and their own infrastructure. The $420M+ figure only accounts for major public cases. The real figure is likely significantly higher.”

So far, the report has triggered multiple comments from the crypto community, especially in light of the Drift Protocol exploit. For many, it raises questions about Circle positioning its USDC as a more regulatory-compliant stablecoin.

Still, it is unlikely to have any major impact on the USDC position as the second biggest stablecoin. USDC currently has a circulating supply of $77 billion. Circle stock CRCL remains up year-to-date despite a recent decline.

The post ZachXBT Alleges a $420 Million Compliance Failure at Circle Since 2022 appeared first on The Market Periodical.

Market Opportunity
Movement Logo
Movement Price(MOVE)
$0.01797
$0.01797$0.01797
+1.87%
USD
Movement (MOVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Urges Treasury to Clarify GENIUS Act Implementation

Coinbase Urges Treasury to Clarify GENIUS Act Implementation

The post Coinbase Urges Treasury to Clarify GENIUS Act Implementation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Coinbase has called on the U.S. Treasury Department to provide clearer guidance on the implementation of the GENIUS Act, warning that excessive regulation could undermine innovation and weaken the country’s position as a global leader in digital finance. Source: Coinbase In an official statement, Coinbase’s Director of Policy, Faryar Shirzad, said that new rules should “ensure the competitiveness of U.S. stablecoins and create conditions for their global adoption as a payment instrument.” The exchange cautioned the Treasury against introducing restrictions not explicitly outlined in the law, urging policymakers to focus on innovation rather than limitation. Coinbase’s Recommendations for the GENIUS Framework In its response, Coinbase proposed several key adjustments to the regulatory framework. It suggested that non-financial software developers, blockchain validators, and open protocols be excluded from GENIUS compliance requirements. The company also argued that the ban on interest payments should apply only to stablecoin issuers, not to exchanges or intermediaries offering bonus programs or loyalty rewards. Coinbase emphasized that rewards from third parties should not be considered a violation, warning that a broad definition of “interest” could distort the intent of the legislation. The firm additionally proposed that payment stablecoins be treated as cash equivalents for accounting and tax purposes — a move it said would “reflect their real-world use as stable digital currencies.” The GENIUS Act and Its Impact Signed into law in July 2025, the GENIUS Act marked the first comprehensive federal regulation of the U.S. stablecoin market. The law requires that all stablecoins be fully backed by liquid assets, mandates annual audits for issuers, and sets rules for foreign-issued tokens operating in the U.S. market. Coinbase urged regulators to uphold Congress’s original intent, emphasizing that effective policy should allow innovation to grow within the framework of the law, not in defiance of it. Not all lawmakers…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/07 02:16
Q2 Market Insights: Bitcoin regains dominance in risk-averse environment, ETFs remain critical to market structure

Q2 Market Insights: Bitcoin regains dominance in risk-averse environment, ETFs remain critical to market structure

The market will show a downward trend in the short term, and then rebound and set new highs in the second half of the year.
Share
PANews2025/04/28 19:40
Critical USDT0 Response to Drift Hack Exposes Stark Contrast in Stablecoin Security Protocols

Critical USDT0 Response to Drift Hack Exposes Stark Contrast in Stablecoin Security Protocols

BitcoinWorld Critical USDT0 Response to Drift Hack Exposes Stark Contrast in Stablecoin Security Protocols In a decisive security move that highlights evolving
Share
bitcoinworld2026/04/02 17:15

$30,000 in PRL + 15,000 USDT

$30,000 in PRL + 15,000 USDT$30,000 in PRL + 15,000 USDT

Deposit & trade PRL to boost your rewards!