Sam Bankman Fried's investments could have reached a value of $100 billion after the collapse of FTX thanks to early bets on Anthropic, Cursor and other hugelySam Bankman Fried's investments could have reached a value of $100 billion after the collapse of FTX thanks to early bets on Anthropic, Cursor and other hugely

Sam Bankman-Fried's Venture Investments: The Disgraced FTX CEO's Bets Would Have Netted $100 Billion

2026/06/18 22:32
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

One of the strangest stories in modern finance starts with a man convicted of stealing customer funds and ends with a startup portfolio that, on paper, looks almost unbelievable. 

Sam Bankman-Fried helped drive FTX into collapse. Yet some of his early private bets later turned into massive paper winners.

This isn't a defense of what happened at FTX. Sam Bankman-Fried’s investments are separate from what he did at FTX.

This is a look at the math behind the "what if." If the big winners had stayed intact, later valuations for Anthropic, Cursor, and a handful of other holdings suggest the upside could have crossed $100 billion.

Why Sam Bankman-Fried's venture portfolio looks smarter in hindsight

Venture investing always looks cleaner in reverse. Once the winners are obvious, early checks can seem like genius.

The role of timing, luck, and early access in startup investing

Startup returns depend on getting in before a company becomes famous. That's the whole trick. By the time everyone wants in, most of the upside is already gone.

Before FTX imploded, Bankman-Fried had money, buzz, and access. Founders took meetings. Funds opened doors. He was part of the small crowd that got to see promising companies before they became household names in tech circles.

Sam Bankman-Fried

It means he had a shot at deals most investors never even hear about. In private markets, being early matters a lot.

Why one huge winner can outweigh many smaller misses

Venture math is weird if you're used to public stocks. You don't need ten perfect picks. You need one monster hit.

One huge startup winner can make an entire portfolio look legendary.

That's why this story sounds so outsized. A few ordinary or failed bets barely matter if one company explodes in value. Anthropic looks like that kind of winner. Cursor looks like another. Once those numbers balloon, the misses fade into the background.

The biggest winners in Sam Bankman-Fried's portfolio

These are the (approximate) holdings that make the most impact:

Investment Reported entry Later paper value  Why it mattered
Anthropic About $500 million Up to about $80 billion in aggressive estimates Main driver
Cursor About $200,000 About $3 billion at a $60 billion valuation Tiny check, huge return
Other holdings SpaceX, Robinhood, Solana exposure Added major upside Helped push the total higher

Anthropic did most of the heavy lifting. Cursor added the jaw-drop factor. The rest turned a giant total into an even bigger one.

Anthropic, the AI bet that could have been worth about $80 billion

The biggest swing came from Anthropic. Reports have said FTX and Alameda put about $500 million into the company early, and some later write-ups used an original ownership figure around 13.5%.

That's where the giant number comes from. If you apply that kind of stake to much richer later marks during the AI frenzy, the paper value can stretch toward $80 billion. In that version of the math, one half-billion-dollar investment turns into something like a 160x return. 

Even if you use lower estimates, the gain still looks huge. Anthropic became one of the clearest beneficiaries of the AI race, and early ownership in a company like that can turn a bold check into a staggering one. 

Cursor, the tiny check that became a giant payday

Cursor is the opposite kind of story. Anthropic was a big swing. Cursor was a tiny seed that grew into a giant tree.

One report says Alameda put about $200,000 into Cursor's parent company in 2022 for roughly 5%. Cursor makes an AI coding tool for developers, and its rise turned that small early stake into an eye-popping asset. With SpaceX recently acquiring Cursor for $60 billion, the 5% stake would have been worth $3 billion.

SpaceX, Robinhood, and Solana helped push the total even higher

Anthropic and Cursor weren't alone. Other holdings also added weight.

There was indirect exposure to SpaceX through K5 Global. There were Robinhood shares. There was Solana, which became one of the biggest names in crypto after surviving the post-FTX wreckage. None of those pieces appear to be the main reason the total climbs toward $100 billion, but they play their part.

What the $100 billion headline really means

The big number is real in one sense and slippery in another. It describes a possible paper value, not a vault full of spendable cash.

Paper wealth is not the same as money in the bank

Private company stakes are hard to sell. They come with lockups, limited buyers, legal restrictions, and valuation swings. A headline number is a snapshot, not a cashier's check.

Some of these estimates also assume the original stakes stayed intact, or at least stayed close to their original size. In real life, ownership gets diluted. Bankruptcy sales happen. Markets cool off. A hot private valuation can rise fast and fall fast.

A $100 billion portfolio on paper is not the same thing as $100 billion in cash.

FTX's collapse changed everything. The customers and creditors didn't get to sit back and wait for every bet to mature at peak value.

The bottom line

Sam Bankman-Fried will be remembered first for FTX, fraud, and prison. But the other part of the record is also important – his early bets on Anthropic, Cursor, and a few other companies were timed with eerie precision.

The result is one of the wildest paper fortunes never fully realized. A man tied to massive destruction also left behind a $100 billion what-if, and that contradiction may be the most unforgettable number in the whole saga.

FAQ

What were SBF investments worth on paper?

SBF investments could have been worth tens of billions of dollars on paper if the biggest private holdings stayed intact. The largest driver was Anthropic, while smaller bets like Cursor added even more upside. 

What was the size of Sam Bankman-Fried's Cursor investment?

Sam Bankman-Fried Cursor reportedly invested roughly $200,000 to acquire a 5% stake of Cursor’s parent company. 

How much was the Sam Bankman-Fried Anthropic investment worth?

The Sam Bankman-Fried Anthropic investment is the biggest part of the story. FTX and Alameda reportedly invested about $500 million in Anthropic early on. Based on aggressive later valuation estimates, that stake could have been worth up to about $80 billion on paper.

What was Sam Bankman-Fried’s net worth after these investments?

Sam Bankman-Fried net worth figures depend heavily on what you count. The $100 billion number is not a clean personal net worth figure. It’s a hypothetical paper value based on what certain venture holdings might have been worth if they were preserved, not sold, diluted, or tied up in bankruptcy.

CHZ +28%! Will History Repeat?

CHZ +28%! Will History Repeat?CHZ +28%! Will History Repeat?

0-fee opening long & short. Be ready for any move!

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Peter Schiff Warns MicroStrategy May Be Forced to Sell Bitcoin to Save Stock

Peter Schiff Warns MicroStrategy May Be Forced to Sell Bitcoin to Save Stock

BitcoinWorld Peter Schiff Warns MicroStrategy May Be Forced to Sell Bitcoin to Save Stock Peter Schiff, a longtime Bitcoin critic and CEO of Euro Pacific Capital
Share
bitcoinworld2026/06/24 21:15
Nvidia (NVDA) Stock Holds $200 Despite Analyst Targets Above $305

Nvidia (NVDA) Stock Holds $200 Despite Analyst Targets Above $305

Nvidia (NVDA) holds above $200 with 48 Buy ratings and a $305 target. Forward P/E at 19.34x sits below the S&P 500 average despite 85% revenue growth. The post
Share
Blockonomi2026/06/24 22:39

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200xWorld Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

Combine up to 20 World Cup matches in one order