Why Finland’s schools leave ours in the dust — Ahmad Ibrahim
JUNE 26 — You must have heard this one before. A politician stands at a podium, wringing their hands about “falling behind,” “global competitiveness,” and the urgent need for more standardised tests, longer school days, and harder math drills. The solution, they always insist, is to crack the whip harder. They are looking in the wrong direction. If you want to see the most successful education system in the world, you don’t go to the rote-learning factories of East Asia. You go north. You go to Finland. And what you find there will shatter every assumption you hold about teaching, learning, and human potential.
Finnish students don’t start formal school until age seven. They have the shortest school days in the developed world, roughly 20 hours a week, compared to over 30 in the US. They take 15-minute outdoor breaks for every 45 minutes of instruction. Homework is minimal — often less than 30 minutes a night. Yet, for over two decades, Finland has consistently ranked among the top three nations in the PISA tests, excelling not just in reading and science, but in the kind of creative, collaborative problem-solving that algorithms can’t replicate. We have been sold a lie that rigor means misery, and that success requires stress. Finland proves that the opposite is true. The secret sauce isn’t a curriculum. It’s a philosophy. In Finland, education rests on a single, radical pillar: trust.
First, they trust their teachers. Teaching is one of the most prestigious careers in the country, on par with doctors or lawyers. Every teacher must earn a master’s degree — fully paid for by the state. And here’s the kicker: there are no national standardised tests until the very end of high school. No principals obsessing over “value-added” data. No scripted lessons from a central bureaucracy. Finnish teachers are treated as professionals, given autonomy to design their own assessments and adapt to the child in front of them. When you treat teachers like assembly-line workers, they act like it. When you treat them like experts, they rise to the occasion.
Second, they trust the children. The system has no gifted programs, and no “tracking”. They practice what they call “inclusive education” — a student who struggles is not a problem to be removed from the classroom; they are a challenge to be met with special educators, smaller groups, and more time. The goal is not to produce the highest test score for the few. It is to produce the highest average for the many. And they succeed: Finland’s achievement gap between the richest and poorest students is the smallest in the Western world. So, can we copy this? Of course. But we won’t. Because adopting the Finnish model would require us to admit that almost everything we are doing right now is wrong.
How do you replicate it? Stop reducing education to a data point. You cannot measure curiosity, resilience, or the ability to work with others on a Scantron sheet. Pay teachers like the knowledge workers they are. Give them master’s degrees on the public dime. And then — here’s the scary part — get out of their way. In Finland, first-graders spend more time on arts, crafts, physical education, and “free play” than they do on formal math. Neuroscience backs this: a child who moves and plays is a child who learns. The only thing that is truly standardised in Finland is the quality of the school building and the free, hot meal every child receives every day. You don’t fix a broken home by punishing the child with more math drills. You fix it by making school a place of safety and warmth.
Critics will whine: “Finland is small, homogenous, and wealthy.” It’s a tired excuse. Finland was a poor, agrarian nation 60 years ago. And it transformed itself through radical policy, not demographics. Moreover, the second and third most successful systems — Canada and Estonia — prove the model works in diverse, large, or post-Soviet contexts as well. The inconvenient truth is that we know what works. We just don’t have the courage to do it. The most successful education system in the world didn’t get there by demanding more. It got there by demanding better — better trained adults, better respect for childhood, and a better definition of success.
Until we are brave enough to trust our teachers and stop treating our children like future GDP units, we will remain stuck in the industrial-reform model of education. We will keep cranking the lever, adding more tests, more hours, more stress. And Finland will keep quietly, successfully, letting its seven-year-olds play in the snow. The choice is ours. But the evidence is not ambiguous.
* Professor Datuk Ahmad Ibrahim is affiliated with the Tan Sri Omar Centre for STI Policy Studies at UCSI University and is an Adjunct Professor at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya. He can be reached at ahmadibrahim@ucsiuniversity.edu.my
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
You May Also Like
Chams founder Demola Aladekomo retires from board after 40 years
Ethereum koers toont zeldzaam dubbel koopsignaal en richt zich op $4.550
Bangko Sentral gives banks relief on paper losses. But does this just push risk out of sight?
