The post Hyperliquid Holds Firm Amid Market Chaos, 100% Uptime… appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. As volatility ripped through the crypto market, Hyperliquid stood its ground. The decentralized derivatives platform recorded 100% uptime and zero bad debt, even as billions of dollars in positions were liquidated across the ecosystem. According to founder Jeff, this was the first time in over two years that Hyperliquid activated its cross-margin Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, a key safeguard used only in extreme conditions. “During recent volatility, Hyperliquid had 100% uptime with zero bad debt,” Jeff wrote. “This was Hyperliquid’s first cross-margin ADL in more than two years of operation.” TLDR: During recent volatility, Hyperliquid had 100% uptime with zero bad debt. This was Hyperliquid’s first cross-margin ADL in more than 2 years of operation. ADL does not change the outcome for any liquidated users. While some specific ADL providing trades were unfavorable,… — jeff.hl (@chameleon_jeff) October 11, 2025 While some specific ADL trades were unfavorable, Jeff emphasized that, in aggregate, the mechanism allowed traders to capture substantial profits through brief favorable liquidations. Solvency and Uptime Take Center Stage Jeff addressed criticism directed toward Hyperliquid following the event, describing it as “sad” that some were attacking the platform to deflect from their own technical failures. “Solvency and uptime are the two most important properties of a financial system,” he said. “Gaslighting users to believe otherwise is unethical and irresponsible.” The founder reaffirmed that Hyperliquid’s design priorities, solvency, transparency, and fairness, are non-negotiable. Every trade, liquidation, and margin event remains verifiable onchain, offering a level of transparency that few competitors match. Liquidations and System Design When markets swing violently, liquidation systems are pushed to their limits. Jeff used the opportunity to explain how Hyperliquid’s margining system handled the chaos. In a perpetuals market, every position must be backed by a maintenance margin, the minimum collateral required to stay solvent. When the collateral… The post Hyperliquid Holds Firm Amid Market Chaos, 100% Uptime… appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. As volatility ripped through the crypto market, Hyperliquid stood its ground. The decentralized derivatives platform recorded 100% uptime and zero bad debt, even as billions of dollars in positions were liquidated across the ecosystem. According to founder Jeff, this was the first time in over two years that Hyperliquid activated its cross-margin Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, a key safeguard used only in extreme conditions. “During recent volatility, Hyperliquid had 100% uptime with zero bad debt,” Jeff wrote. “This was Hyperliquid’s first cross-margin ADL in more than two years of operation.” TLDR: During recent volatility, Hyperliquid had 100% uptime with zero bad debt. This was Hyperliquid’s first cross-margin ADL in more than 2 years of operation. ADL does not change the outcome for any liquidated users. While some specific ADL providing trades were unfavorable,… — jeff.hl (@chameleon_jeff) October 11, 2025 While some specific ADL trades were unfavorable, Jeff emphasized that, in aggregate, the mechanism allowed traders to capture substantial profits through brief favorable liquidations. Solvency and Uptime Take Center Stage Jeff addressed criticism directed toward Hyperliquid following the event, describing it as “sad” that some were attacking the platform to deflect from their own technical failures. “Solvency and uptime are the two most important properties of a financial system,” he said. “Gaslighting users to believe otherwise is unethical and irresponsible.” The founder reaffirmed that Hyperliquid’s design priorities, solvency, transparency, and fairness, are non-negotiable. Every trade, liquidation, and margin event remains verifiable onchain, offering a level of transparency that few competitors match. Liquidations and System Design When markets swing violently, liquidation systems are pushed to their limits. Jeff used the opportunity to explain how Hyperliquid’s margining system handled the chaos. In a perpetuals market, every position must be backed by a maintenance margin, the minimum collateral required to stay solvent. When the collateral…

Hyperliquid Holds Firm Amid Market Chaos, 100% Uptime…

As volatility ripped through the crypto market, Hyperliquid stood its ground. The decentralized derivatives platform recorded 100% uptime and zero bad debt, even as billions of dollars in positions were liquidated across the ecosystem.

According to founder Jeff, this was the first time in over two years that Hyperliquid activated its cross-margin Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, a key safeguard used only in extreme conditions.

While some specific ADL trades were unfavorable, Jeff emphasized that, in aggregate, the mechanism allowed traders to capture substantial profits through brief favorable liquidations.

Solvency and Uptime Take Center Stage

Jeff addressed criticism directed toward Hyperliquid following the event, describing it as “sad” that some were attacking the platform to deflect from their own technical failures.

The founder reaffirmed that Hyperliquid’s design priorities, solvency, transparency, and fairness, are non-negotiable. Every trade, liquidation, and margin event remains verifiable onchain, offering a level of transparency that few competitors match.

Liquidations and System Design

When markets swing violently, liquidation systems are pushed to their limits. Jeff used the opportunity to explain how Hyperliquid’s margining system handled the chaos.

In a perpetuals market, every position must be backed by a maintenance margin, the minimum collateral required to stay solvent. When the collateral falls short, the system takes over the position and liquidates it.

Earlier in the day, many altcoins had dropped over 50% in minutes. That forced 2x-leveraged or higher long positions into liquidation. Hyperliquid’s transparent liquidation engine ensured that these liquidations were executed systematically to prevent bad debt.

Billions of dollars in open interest were liquidated in under 20 minutes, all visible onchain. In a permissionless system, each trader manages their own leverage and collateralization. If a platform fails to liquidate undercollateralized users in time, it risks endangering everyone’s funds.

Jeff pointed out that while other exchanges may underreport liquidation data, Hyperliquid’s full onchain visibility means “you see everything, the good, the bad, and the volatile.”

HLP: The Backstop of Last Resort

Central to Hyperliquid’s stability is HLP, a protocol vault with permissionless deposits.

It serves two purposes, providing order book liquidity and performing backstop liquidations when the market cannot absorb all liquidations normally.

While its market share in order book trading is negligible (less than 1%), its liquidation role is critical.

Here’s how it works:

  • If the order book lacks liquidity to close an undercollateralized position, HLP steps in.
  • It takes over the position and its collateral.
  • For risk management, HLP is split into multiple child vaults, with each liquidation assigned to one vault.

This structure allows the system to isolate risk, ensuring that even when one vault absorbs heavy losses, others remain stable.

The Role of Auto-Deleveraging (ADL)

Auto-Deleveraging is the final safety mechanism, the “last resort” liquidation event that activates when both market and backstop systems are exhausted.

Each ADL event has two sides:

  •  The triggered side, the undercollateralized position.
  •  The providing side, selected based on leverage and profitability.

In most cases, ADL providers are profitable overall, but outcomes can vary per event. Some ADL trades perform poorly, especially when only part of a portfolio is closed.

Jeff emphasized that Hyperliquid’s system minimizes ADL triggers because they are unpredictable, even if the average outcome benefits the market.

This week’s activation marked the first cross-margin ADL on Hyperliquid mainnet since launch. In contrast, isolated assets such as hyperps see more frequent ADLs since they’re not backstopped by HLP.

Inside the 20-Minute Liquidation Window

Over roughly 20 minutes, HLP liquidated billions of dollars in positions as altcoins tumbled.

HLP’s role isn’t to profit, it’s to maintain system solvency. The vault doesn’t pick and choose liquidations based on profitability. Instead, it operates as a public good, ensuring all users remain protected during sharp market dislocations.

HLP charges no liquidation fees. Its child vault architecture, designed through countless simulations, ensures that the system maximizes protection while managing its own risk.

During the event, several child vaults themselves became temporarily undercollateralized after taking on massive user positions. This was intentional: their isolation prevents risk from spilling over into the rest of the protocol.

HLP was even the largest address group on the triggered side of ADL, by more than an order of magnitude.

Traders on the providing side of these ADL events collectively realized hundreds of millions of dollars in additional profit, capturing momentary dislocation windows that closed within seconds.

Transparency Sets Hyperliquid Apart

Jeff contrasted Hyperliquid’s design with that of other venues where liquidation mechanisms are opaque and internally managed.

On those exchanges, liquidation engines might operate with different margin requirements or selectively backstop positions to protect exchange revenue, potentially at the cost of solvency risk.

Transparency and onchain verifiability are at the heart of the protocol’s credibility. Every liquidation event, every ADL, and every fund movement is public, not obscured by internal matching systems or offchain reports.

Jeff concluded his post by recognizing the difficulties traders faced during the market crash but reaffirmed his commitment to building a transparent and resilient system.

He urged the community to stay united, pointing out that times like this reveal the importance of fairness and transparency in financial systems.

The event was not just a test of market participants, it was a real-world stress test for Hyperliquid’s design. And by all accounts, the system passed.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Source: https://nulltx.com/hyperliquid-holds-firm-amid-market-chaos-100-uptime-zero-bad-debt/

Market Opportunity
Bad Idea AI Logo
Bad Idea AI Price(BAD)
$0.00000000096
$0.00000000096$0.00000000096
-1.03%
USD
Bad Idea AI (BAD) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00