What Is Arthur Hayes Buying After ‘Rotating Out’ of Ethereum?
The post What Is Arthur Hayes Buying After ‘Rotating Out’ of Ethereum? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News
Arthur Hayes is back in focus because of where his money is moving.
As Ethereum trades sideways near the key $3,000 level, the BitMEX co-founder has begun trimming his ETH exposure and rotating into decentralized finance tokens, a shift that’s catching attention across the crypto market.
Hayes Moves Millions Out of ETH
On-chain data shows that on December 19, Hayes transferred 508.647 ETH worth about $1.5 million to Galaxy Digital. Today, he moved another 680 ETH, valued at roughly $2.03 million, explicitly to sell and rotate into high-quality DeFi tokens, according to Lookonchain.
These transfers come at a sensitive moment for Ethereum. ETH has struggled to move decisively above resistance and is currently consolidating slightly below $3,000. Spot Ethereum ETFs are also suffering through 7 continous days of outflows, adding pressure.
Market analysts say ETH needs to hold current levels to avoid a deeper pullback toward the $2,700-$2,800 zone, while a clean break above $3,200 could restore momentum.
DeFi Rotation Takes Shape
Lookonchain confirmed that Hayes recently bought 1.22 million ENA, showing active rotation into what he describes as “high-quality” DeFi assets.
His view is that improving fiat liquidity may benefit DeFi tokens more than large-cap layer-one assets like Ethereum, especially if risk appetite remains strong.
That stance has sparked debate, with some traders pointing out DeFi’s higher volatility during liquidity shifts.
Just a Short-Term Strategy?
Despite the selling, Hayes’ long-term view on Ethereum is unlikely to change as he has often defended its potential. This is also why the announcement came as a surprise to many.
For now, the market response has been measured. Derivatives volatility remains muted, suggesting caution rather than panic.
You May Also Like
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement
