TLDR: Stellar in 2025 strengthened its payment rails by prioritizing low fees, speed, and accessibility across markets. Soroban smart contracts matured in 2025,TLDR: Stellar in 2025 strengthened its payment rails by prioritizing low fees, speed, and accessibility across markets. Soroban smart contracts matured in 2025,

Stellar in 2025: How XLM Cemented Its Role as a Global Payments and RWA Network

TLDR:

  • Stellar in 2025 strengthened its payment rails by prioritizing low fees, speed, and accessibility across markets.
  • Soroban smart contracts matured in 2025, supporting live dApps and practical use beyond experimental deployments.
  • Real-world asset tokenization expanded on Stellar, enabling compliant on-chain treasuries and financial instruments.
  • Institutional users continued building on Stellar in 2025, relying on network stability and predictable performance.

Stellar in 2025 marked a defining period for the network, shaped by steady delivery rather than market noise. 

The year reflected measurable adoption across payments, smart contracts, and tokenized assets. 

Network activity showed consistent utility, while institutional participation remained stable. As XLM traded near $0.21, Stellar entered 2026 positioned as an operational blockchain infrastructure.

Payments, Infrastructure, and Network Reliability

Stellar in 2025 reinforced its original mandate of fast, low-cost, and accessible payments. Network development stayed centered on cross-border transfers and financial access within emerging markets. 

This focus aligned with long-standing use cases rather than short-term trends.

The Scopuly Stellar Wallet account summarized this positioning in a public post, noting the network prioritized infrastructure delivery. 

The commentary emphasized execution over speculation, reflecting how Stellar continued improving settlement efficiency. Payment rails remained active across remittances, fintech platforms, and regional corridors.

Protocol upgrades throughout the year supported performance, security, and developer tooling. These changes occurred without disrupting network reliability, which remained a core requirement for financial participants. 

Stability at scale continued to differentiate Stellar from higher-volatility blockchain environments.

Smart Contracts, Tokenization, and Institutional Activity

Stellar in 2025 also saw Soroban smart contracts progress from early experimentation to production use. 

Developer participation increased alongside live decentralized applications operating on mainnet. Use cases focused on practical deployment rather than demonstration environments.

According to the Scopuly update, Soroban’s growth reflected real application demand. The ecosystem showed more contract executions and sustained developer engagement. 

This shift supported broader functionality while maintaining predictable network costs.

Real-world asset tokenization became more visible during the year. Stellar hosted tokenized treasuries, compliant financial instruments, and localized on-chain products. 

These deployments aligned with regulatory frameworks and operational finance requirements.

Institutional engagement remained consistent across 2025. Banks, payment providers, fintech firms, and public entities continued using Stellar for settlement and issuance. 

The network served as a neutral layer for cross-border value transfer and on-chain finance workflows.

XLM maintained a functional role across the ecosystem, supporting fees, liquidity, and network trust. Daily usage reflected operational demand rather than speculative activity. 

As noted in the Scopuly post, Stellar exited 2025 as a working network, defined by delivery and continuity rather than promises.

The post Stellar in 2025: How XLM Cemented Its Role as a Global Payments and RWA Network appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Stellar Logo
Stellar Price(XLM)
$0.2138
$0.2138$0.2138
-2.41%
USD
Stellar (XLM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Let insiders trade – Blockworks

Let insiders trade – Blockworks

The post Let insiders trade – Blockworks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from The Breakdown newsletter. To read more editions, subscribe ​​“The most valuable commodity I know of is information.” — Gordon Gekko, Wall Street Ten months ago, FBI agents raided Shayne Coplan’s Manhattan apartment, ostensibly in search of evidence that the prediction market he founded, Polymarket, had illegally allowed US residents to place bets on the US election. Two weeks ago, the CFTC gave Polymarket the green light to allow those very same US residents to place bets on whatever they like. This is quite the turn of events — and it’s not just about elections or politics. With its US government seal of approval in hand, Polymarket is reportedly raising capital at a valuation of $9 billion — a reflection of the growing belief that prediction markets will be used for much more than betting on elections once every four years. Instead, proponents say prediction markets can provide a real service to the world by providing it with better information about nearly everything. I think they might, too — but only if insiders are free to participate. Yesterday, for example, Polymarket announced new betting markets on company earnings reports, with a promise that it would improve the information that investors have to work with.  Instead of waiting three months to find out how a company is faring, investors could simply watch the odds on Polymarket.  If the probability of an earnings beat is rising, for example, investors would know at a glance that things are going well. But that will only happen if enough of the people betting actually know how things are going. Relying on the wisdom of crowds to magically discern how a business is doing won’t add much incremental knowledge to the world; everyone’s guesses are unlikely to average out to the truth. If…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:16
U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile partners with IGB Berhad for 5G indoor network deployment across 20 Malaysian properties.
Share
bitcoininfonews2025/12/21 20:20