Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a critical element in the email authentication ecosystem. An SPF record, published as a DNS TXT record, authorizes specific IP Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a critical element in the email authentication ecosystem. An SPF record, published as a DNS TXT record, authorizes specific IP

What Is SPF Flattening? A Complete Guide To Flattening Your SPF Records

Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a critical element in the email authentication ecosystem. An SPF record, published as a DNS TXT record, authorizes specific IP addresses to send emails on behalf of your domain. This mechanism helps prevent email spoofing by allowing recipient email servers to verify that incoming messages come from permitted sources.

The Anatomy of an SPF Record

An SPF record contains mechanisms like `a`, `mx`, `include`, and `redirect` terms. These mechanisms help define which servers or services are allowed to send on your behalf. The `a` and `mx` mechanisms reference the domain’s A or MX DNS records, while `include` allows domains to delegate authentication to other domains—for instance, including sales._spf.example.com or support._spf.example.com if you use external senders.

The 10 DNS Lookup Limit

Despite its utility, the SPF framework has a crucial constraint: a maximum of 10 DNS lookups per SPF evaluation. Every external reference in your SPF record—such as an `include` directive or a `redirect` term—triggers a DNS lookup. Once this 10 DNS lookup limit is exceeded, the SPF validation process fails, leading to SPF failures. This can negatively impact your email deliverability, with legitimate messages being rejected or filtered as spam.

The widespread use of multiple cloud-based email services increases the complexity of SPF records. Using several `include` terms—such as for Salesforce, Mailchimp, Microsoft 365, or Google Workspace—quickly exhausts your DNS query budget.

Additional Limitations: Void Lookups and DNS Record Length

Beyond the lookup cap, SPF records also face DNS record length limitations. Exceeding 255 characters in a single string or a total record length beyond DNS protocol limits can cause SPF validation errors. Void lookups—in which a referenced record returns no result—also count against the 10 DNS lookup limit, increasing the risk of SPF failures during evaluation.

What Is SPF Flattening and Why Is It Needed?

SPF flattening is the process of converting complex SPF records containing nested `include` terms and indirect lookups into a simplified list of direct IP addresses. A flattened SPF record replaces most or all `include`, `a`, `mx`, and `redirect` mechanisms with explicit IP addresses. This process is critical to ensure compliance with the 10 DNS lookup limit and avoid SPF failures that affect email deliverability.

Why Is SPF Flattening Necessary?

Organizations relying on multiple email services often exceed the SPF lookup threshold. When this happens, SPF validation results in a “permerror” (permanent error), causing legitimate emails to fail authentication checks. As a result, email deliverability is compromised, and recipients may never receive important communications.

SPF flattening addresses these challenges by generating a flattened SPF record that expands all relevant references into a direct IP list. This not only reduces the maintenance burden associated with root-cause analysis of SPF issues but also ensures SPF compliance as recommended by email security vendors and industry standards like DMARC.

Flattening vs. Splitting SPF Records

Some organizations attempt to split SPF records or use SPF macros to stay within limits. However, split SPF records are generally discouraged, as domains can only publish a single SPF record. Using SPF macros or a macro-based solution may also introduce complexity and incompatibility with some email servers. Flattening is a more robust approach, especially with automation via third-party services like AutoSPF, DMARC Duty, or Dynamic SPF solution providers.

How SPF Flattener Tools Work

SPF flattener tools automate the process of resolving all `a`, `mx`, `include`, and `redirect` terms in your SPF record to their underlying IP addresses. They produce a flattened SPF record that minimizes DNS lookups during SPF evaluation, ensuring reliable SPF passes and optimal email deliverability.

Core Functionality of SPF Flattener Tools

  • Deep Parsing: The SPF tool recursively examines all domains in include terms, a, mx, and redirect terms.
  • DNS Resolution: The tool fetches the current IP list associated with each term.
  • Record Synthesis: It generates a single SPF record composed almost exclusively of `ip4` and `ip6` mechanisms.
  • Automation and Updating: Advanced solutions (like Dynamic SPF or AutoSPF for Enterprise) automate the ongoing SPF updating process, alerting users when an outdated SPF record needs to be re-flattened.

Many providers offer automatic SPF flattening, either as a free SPF flattening tool or as part of a broader email security suite. Solutions like AutoSPF integrate with the AutoSPF dashboard and can be scaled for IT departments via AutoSPF for SMBs and Enterprise, while partner programs offer support for resellers and MSPs.

Step-by-Step Guide to Flattening Your SPF Record

Flattening your SPF record can be done manually or by leveraging specialized SPF management automation tools. Below is a general step-by-step approach:

1. Assess Your Current SPF Record

  • Retrieve your existing SPF record using a trusted SPF checker or SPF validation tool.
  • Identify all `include`, `a`, `mx`, and `redirect` terms.

2. Expand All References

  • For each `include` domain (e.g., sales._spf.example.com, support._spf.example.com), retrieve its current SPF record and extract all relevant IP addresses.
  • Resolve all `a` and `mx` mechanisms to their respective IP addresses using DNS lookups.
  • If using `redirect`, resolve that record as well.

3. Compile the Full IP List

  • Collect all IP addresses found in the earlier step and ensure you avoid duplication.
  • Consider any IPs added or changed by your business-email.service or integrated email platforms since the last flattening.

4. Construct the Flattened SPF Record

  • Synthesize your SPF record using only the necessary `ip4` and `ip6` mechanisms, minimizing or eliminating additional DNS lookups.
  • Confirm your record does not exceed DNS record length limitation (generally less than 512 characters per TXT record).

5. Update DNS and Test

  • Publish the flattened SPF record in your DNS as the new TXT entry.
  • Use an SPF checker to validate SPF compliance and successful SPF passes.
  • Monitor SPF evaluation results for void lookups or SPF failures.

6. Automate Ongoing Maintenance

  • Consider leveraging a Dynamic SPF solution or third-party managed SPF service (like DMARC Duty or AutoSPF) to continually monitor, re-flatten, and maintain your SPF record.
  • Automation mitigates risks from outdated SPF record configurations whenever your email services shift IP addresses or update their infrastructure.

Best Practices and Potential Pitfalls When Flattening SPF Records

Flattening SPF records is not without its challenges. While it powerfully mitigates the DNS lookup limitation, it introduces new maintenance considerations.

Best Practices for Effective SPF Flattening

  • Regular SPF Updating: Re-flatten your SPF record whenever you add or remove email services, as the underlying IP list can change frequently.
  • Monitor Provider Changes: Be aware that your business-email.service provider may update their sending IPs without notice. Use automation or periodic checks to catch these changes.
  • Leverage Tools and Automation: Use trusted SPF tools—such as AutoSPF, DMARC Duty, or Dynamic SPF solution providers—for automatic SPF flattening and compliance monitoring.
  • Combine With DMARC and DKIM: SPF alone is not sufficient for comprehensive email protection. Deploy DMARC and DKIM alongside your flattened SPF record for robust authentication.

Potential Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

IP Obsolescence and Outdated SPF Records

Using a static flattened SPF record can quickly lead to SPF failures as email services update their infrastructure. Automation and regular reviews via the AutoSPF dashboard or similar tools help avoid the maintenance burden of manual checks.

DNS Record Length Limitation

Flattening can lead to overly long SPF records if too many IP addresses are included. This can cause DNS issues or invalid records. Always use an SPF checker to validate after each change.

Provider-Specific Pitfalls

Some email security vendors, such as those offering Dynamic SPF or macro-based solutions, use unique approaches. Evaluate third-party service compatibility and ensure you are not inadvertently splitting SPF records, which violates SPF compliance rules.

Neglecting Void Lookups

An improperly flattened SPF record may still reference domains that yield void lookups, hindering SPF passes. Use automated monitoring to detect and fix SPF record gaps.

Staying Current

SPF flattening is not a one-time project. As email servers and services change, ongoing SPF management using automation tools—such as Dynamic SPF solutions, AutoSPF for SMBs, or the AutoSPF Partner Program—ensures your domain remains SPF compliant and maximizes email deliverability.

If you encounter persistent SPF issues or complex integrations, contact your SPF flattener provider’s support (Get Support) or schedule an expert review (Book A Demo) to modernize your email authentication strategy. Review About Us resources for more on the latest SPF management capabilities.

Read More From Techbullion

Comments
Market Opportunity
Tx24 Logo
Tx24 Price(TXT)
$0.00456
$0.00456$0.00456
+1.10%
USD
Tx24 (TXT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Bitcoin Has Taken Gold’s Role In Today’s World, Eric Trump Says

Bitcoin Has Taken Gold’s Role In Today’s World, Eric Trump Says

Eric Trump on Tuesday described Bitcoin as a “modern-day gold,” calling it a liquid store of value that can act as a hedge to real estate and other assets. Related Reading: XRP’s Biggest Rally Yet? Analyst Projects $20+ In October 2025 According to reports, the remark came during a TV appearance on CNBC’s Squawk Box, tied to the launch of American Bitcoin, the mining and treasury firm he helped start. Company Holdings And Strategy Based on public filings and company summaries, American Bitcoin has accumulated 2,443 BTC on its balance sheet. That stash has been valued in the low hundreds of millions of dollars at recent spot prices. The firm mixes large-scale mining with the goal of holding Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, which it says will help it grow both production and asset holdings over time. Eric Trump’s comments were direct. He told viewers that institutions are treating Bitcoin more like a store of value than a fringe idea, and he warned firms that resist blockchain adoption. The tone was strong at times, and the line about Bitcoin being a modern equivalent of gold was used to frame American Bitcoin’s role as both miner and holder.   Eric Trump has said: bitcoin is modern-day gold — unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) September 16, 2025 How The Company Went Public American Bitcoin moved toward a public listing via an all-stock merger with Gryphon Digital Mining earlier this year, a deal that kept most of the original shareholders in control and positioned the new entity for a Nasdaq debut. Reports show that mining partner Hut 8 holds a large ownership stake, leaving the Trump family and other backers with a minority share. The listing brought fresh attention and capital to the firm as it began trading under the ticker ABTC. Market watchers say the firm’s public debut highlights two trends: mining companies are trying to grow by both producing and holding Bitcoin, and political ties are bringing more headlines to crypto firms. Some analysts point out that holding large amounts of Bitcoin on the balance sheet exposes a company to price swings, while supporters argue it aligns incentives between miners and investors. Related Reading: Ethereum Bulls Target $8,500 With Big Money Backing The Move – Details Reaction And Possible Risks Based on coverage of the launch, investors have reacted with both enthusiasm and caution. Supporters praise the prospect of a US-based miner that aims to be transparent and aggressive about building a reserve. Critics point to governance questions, possible conflicts tied to high-profile backers, and the usual risks of a volatile asset being held on corporate balance sheets. Eric Trump’s remark that Bitcoin has taken gold’s role in today’s world reflects both his belief in its value and American Bitcoin’s strategy of mining and holding. Whether that view sticks will depend on how investors and institutions respond in the months ahead. Featured image from Meta, chart from TradingView
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 06:00
Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps

Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps

The post Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Federal Reserve has made its first Fed rate cut this year following today’s FOMC meeting, lowering interest rates by 25 basis points (bps). This comes in line with expectations, while the crypto market awaits Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s speech for guidance on the committee’s stance moving forward. FOMC Makes First Fed Rate Cut This Year With 25 Bps Cut In a press release, the committee announced that it has decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 bps from between 4.25% and 4.5% to 4% and 4.25%. This comes in line with expectations as market participants were pricing in a 25 bps cut, as against a 50 bps cut. This marks the first Fed rate cut this year, with the last cut before this coming last year in December. Notably, the Fed also made the first cut last year in September, although it was a 50 bps cut back then. All Fed officials voted in favor of a 25 bps cut except Stephen Miran, who dissented in favor of a 50 bps cut. This rate cut decision comes amid concerns that the labor market may be softening, with recent U.S. jobs data pointing to a weak labor market. The committee noted in the release that job gains have slowed, and that the unemployment rate has edged up but remains low. They added that inflation has moved up and remains somewhat elevated. Fed Chair Jerome Powell had also already signaled at the Jackson Hole Conference that they were likely to lower interest rates with the downside risk in the labor market rising. The committee reiterated this in the release that downside risks to employment have risen. Before the Fed rate cut decision, experts weighed in on whether the FOMC should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:36
UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21