TLDR Flow shifts from rollback to precise token burns after $3.9M exploit event! Validators resist ledger rewind, urging plan that preserves real activity on-chainTLDR Flow shifts from rollback to precise token burns after $3.9M exploit event! Validators resist ledger rewind, urging plan that preserves real activity on-chain

Flow Drops Rollback Plan After $3.9M Exploit, Opts for Targeted Token Burns to Protect Users

TLDR

  • Flow shifts from rollback to precise token burns after $3.9M exploit event!
  • Validators resist ledger rewind, urging plan that preserves real activity on-chain
  • Bridges warn of unbacked tokens across chains, shaping burn-first recovery path
  • Network restarts in phases with restricted accounts for safety
  • Foundation pledges updates as TVL rebounds and confidence returns across the network

A new dispute is shaping the Flow network after a major security event forced a change in strategy. The chain is recovering from a $3.9 million exploit, and the shift in direction is raising fresh questions about network governance. The keyword is central to this event because the Foundation is now defending stability while facing wide community pressure.

Flow Reworks Recovery Plan After Validator Pushback

Flow Foundation reversed its initial rollback plan because partners opposed broad ledger changes. The exploit hit the execution layer and exposed a weakness that is now under review. The chain is moving forward with targeted token burns, so the plan is narrower and less disruptive.

The attacker moved assets through several cross-chain paths, and this is creating new forensic demands. Flow teams tracked movements across Thorchain and Chainflip, and they halted the chain as validators aligned on emergency action. The Foundation said user balances were not breached, so the response focused on the counterfeit tokens.

Rollback concerns grew as developers warned that erased transactions could cause mismatches. Asset transfers during the rollback window could create doubled balances, and this is why several operators objected. The Foundation then confirmed it would support a path that preserves legitimate activity.

Bridges and Platforms Address Risk Exposure

Bridge operators flagged gaps in the initial rollback plan because it is risky for custodians. They argued that unbacked tokens could appear on external networks and this concern shaped negotiations. The shift toward targeted burns aims to remove only fraudulent supply.

Market pressure grew as the FLOW token moved lower, and this is reflected in exchange responses. Some trading platforms paused transfers to protect users from accounting issues. Network data showed stalled blocks until validators enabled new software updates.

Total value locked dropped sharply after the exploit, and this is typical after major incidents. DefiLlama charts later showed a partial rebound. The Foundation said remediation steps would continue until flows across the network stabilized.

Network Restarts With Controlled Access and Token Burns

Flow restarted in phases, and this is designed to limit harm while restoring access. Accounts linked to illicit transfers remain restricted under the new plan. Validators approved a software change that enables targeted destruction of fraudulent tokens.

Read-only mode returned first, and this gave developers time to verify state accuracy. Full activity will resume gradually as more checks conclude. The Foundation reported that most accounts remain unaffected.

Dapper Labs supported the revised plan since no user balances were damaged and this is helping restore confidence. The Foundation promised ongoing updates as each restoration step clears. The network is aiming to prevent future vulnerabilities while preserving user trust.

The post Flow Drops Rollback Plan After $3.9M Exploit, Opts for Targeted Token Burns to Protect Users  appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
FLOW Logo
FLOW Price(FLOW)
$0.0991
$0.0991$0.0991
-2.97%
USD
FLOW (FLOW) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Elon Musk and Netanyahu Discuss AI and Tesla Plans In Joint Conference

Elon Musk and Netanyahu Discuss AI and Tesla Plans In Joint Conference

TLDR Elon Musk joined a virtual meeting with Israeli PM Netanyahu to talk AI and transportation technology. Israel aims to lead in AI, using strategies from its
Share
Coincentral2025/12/30 03:05
Elon Musk discusses AI development with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu

Elon Musk discusses AI development with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu

The post Elon Musk discusses AI development with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Musk and Netanyahu discussed
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/30 03:00