Representative Ritchie Torres plans to introduce legislation targeting insider trading on prediction markets following suspicious bets worth over $630,000 placedRepresentative Ritchie Torres plans to introduce legislation targeting insider trading on prediction markets following suspicious bets worth over $630,000 placed

Lawmaker Targets Prediction Market Insider Trading After $400K Maduro Bet

2026/01/05 03:30
6 min read

The Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026 would prohibit federal officials from trading on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi when they possess material nonpublic information about government policy or political outcomes.

The Suspicious Bets That Sparked Outrage

Blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain identified three digital wallets that collectively profited $630,484 by betting on Maduro’s ouster. The timing and behavior of these accounts raised immediate red flags across the crypto community.

The most prominent account, created in late December 2025, wagered approximately $32,500 on contracts predicting Maduro would be removed from power by January 31, 2026. When U.S. forces captured the Venezuelan leader overnight, those shares resolved near $1 each, yielding profits exceeding $400,000—a return of more than 1,200% in less than 24 hours.

According to on-chain data, the three wallets showed remarkably suspicious patterns. Wallet 0x31a5 invested $34,000 and profited $409,900. A second wallet invested $5,800 and made approximately $75,000. The third wallet invested $25,000 and profited $145,600.

Source: @JoePompliano

What made these trades particularly alarming was their precision. All three wallets were created and funded days before the operation. They had no prior trading history on other markets and exclusively bet on Venezuela and Maduro-related events. The bets were placed just hours before Trump announced the military operation, when market prices sat at around 7 cents—implying only a 7% probability of the outcome.

Operation Absolute Resolve

The U.S. military operation that captured Maduro involved over 150 aircraft launched from 20 bases across the Western Hemisphere, according to Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine. The mission, named Operation Absolute Resolve, successfully extracted Maduro and his wife from Venezuela’s largest military complex at Fuerte Tiuna.

President Trump gave final approval for the mission at 10:46 p.m. ET on Friday, January 2. Hours later, explosions rocked Caracas as U.S. forces moved in. Maduro now faces narco-terrorism and drug trafficking charges in New York, stemming from a 2020 federal indictment.

The Polymarket market for Maduro’s removal had hovered at low probabilities for weeks before suddenly spiking around 4:20 a.m. ET on January 3—right around the time of Trump’s announcement. Kalshi, another prediction platform, had priced similar outcomes at roughly 13 cents, showing how unexpected the operation was to most traders.

Torres’s Legislative Response

Representative Torres plans to introduce his bill as soon as possible, according to his spokesman. The legislation would extend STOCK Act principles to prediction markets. Kalshi and Polymarket, the two dominant platforms, generated over $44 billion in combined trading volume in 2025.

The bill would bar federal elected officials, political appointees, and executive branch employees from buying, selling, or exchanging prediction market contracts when they possess material nonpublic information through their official duties. The restriction applies to contracts tied to government policy, government action, or political outcomes on platforms engaged in interstate commerce.

“A newly created Polymarket account invested over $30,000 yesterday in Maduro’s exit. The US then took Maduro into custody overnight, and the trader profited $400,000 in less than 24 hours,” sports commentator Joe Pompliano noted on social media, highlighting concerns about insider advantages.

A spokesman for Torres said the bill has been “in the works for a bit,” but the Venezuela bet news underscored the urgency of introducing it immediately. The legislation currently has no co-sponsors, though Torres hopes to build a broader coalition of support in coming weeks.

Prediction Markets Under Scrutiny

The Maduro betting scandal arrives as prediction markets gain mainstream attention and institutional backing. Polymarket recently secured regulatory approval to operate in the United States after acquiring QCEX for $112 million in July 2025. Intercontinental Exchange, which owns the New York Stock Exchange, invested up to $2 billion in Polymarket at a valuation between $8-9 billion.

During the 2024 presidential election, Polymarket correctly predicted Donald Trump’s victory while many traditional polls showed different results, cementing the platform’s reputation as a legitimate forecasting tool. However, critics argue that when markets involve sensitive political or military outcomes, they become vulnerable to exploitation by insiders with privileged information.

In response to the controversy, Kalshi’s press relations account stated that its rules prohibit insiders or decision-makers from trading on material nonpublic information. Polymarket could not be reached for comment.

Notably, Donald Trump Jr. maintains advisory roles at both major platforms—serving as a strategic advisor to Kalshi since January 2025 and joining Polymarket’s advisory board in August 2025 after his venture capital firm made an eight-figure investment.

The Bigger Picture

The incident highlights fundamental questions about decentralized prediction markets. While blockchain technology provides transparency by making all trades publicly visible, it cannot prevent people with inside knowledge from exploiting that information for profit.

Unlike traditional financial markets where insider trading is clearly illegal and heavily policed, prediction markets currently operate with fewer regulations. Federal law enforcement and military personnel who might have advance knowledge of operations like the Venezuela strike face no legal barriers to profiting from that information on platforms like Polymarket.

One trader even claimed to have made $80,000 betting on Maduro’s capture after noticing increased Domino’s Pizza orders near the Pentagon—often used as a proxy for late-night military activity. While this represents clever observation rather than insider knowledge, it illustrates how information asymmetries can create massive profit opportunities.

Democratic Senator Mark Warner, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, expressed concerns about the precedent set by the Venezuela operation itself. “Does this mean any large country can indict the ruler of a smaller adjacent country and take that person out?” he told CBS News.

The Road Ahead

As prediction markets continue growing and attracting institutional investment, the tension between transparency and fairness will likely intensify. The platforms offer unprecedented ability to aggregate information and forecast future events, but that same openness creates opportunities for those with privileged access to profit unfairly.

Torres’s legislation represents the first major congressional effort to impose insider trading restrictions on prediction markets. If passed, it would treat these platforms more like regulated financial markets by prohibiting government personnel from using material nonpublic information for personal gain.

The bill aims to protect the integrity of markets that rely on the wisdom of the crowd. When insiders can exploit advance knowledge, they undermine that fundamental principle and erode public trust in prediction markets as neutral forecasting tools.

Whether the legislation gains traction remains uncertain. The crypto and prediction market industries have invested heavily in lobbying and building political support. How Congress balances innovation with market integrity will shape the future of this rapidly growing sector.

For now, the three mysterious wallets that profited over $630,000 remain pseudonymous, and their gains remain intact. The blockchain shows what happened and when, but it cannot reveal who placed the bets or what information they possessed.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.001523
$0.001523$0.001523
+3.46%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00