Key Takeaways: Vitalik Buterin publicly walked back a 2017 remark dismissing full user self-verification Advances in ZK-SNARKs now allow blockchain state verificationKey Takeaways: Vitalik Buterin publicly walked back a 2017 remark dismissing full user self-verification Advances in ZK-SNARKs now allow blockchain state verification

Vitalik Retracts 2017 “Mountain Man” Take, Citing ZK-SNARKs as Ethereum’s Safety Net

2026/01/26 22:48
4 min read

Key Takeaways:

  • Vitalik Buterin publicly walked back a 2017 remark dismissing full user self-verification
  • Advances in ZK-SNARKs now allow blockchain state verification without replaying all history
  • Buterin identifies self-verification as a backup to make Ethereum resistant to failures and censorship

One of the positions discussed by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin in 2017 and since amended marks an indication of how much Blockchain technology and his own thought in terms of relevance has changed. In a recent post on X, Buterin explained why he no longer agrees with his earlier criticism of full user self-verification, often mocked as a “Mountain Man” approach.

Read More: Vitalik Sides With Critics as Zcash Faces Deepening Rift Over Token-Voting Governance Push

Revisiting a 2017 Blockchain Debate

A comment posted by Butterin came as a result of an argument with researcher in blockchain Ian Grigg. Grigg at the time proposed blockchains to capture the order of transactions, but not to make any commitment to the state, including account balances or storing smart contracts. The concept was that, state would be recreated on-demand, instead of being stored on-chain.

Buterin strongly opposed this design. He argued that without committing state to the blockchain, users would face two bad choices: run a full node that processes every transaction from genesis or trust a third-party RPC provider. Ethereum’s approach, which commits state roots to block headers, allowed users to verify specific values using Merkle proofs under an honest majority assumption.

In 2017, Buterin considered the full self-verification to be out of practice with most users due to the high computational cost. His stance was oriented to the technological constraints of that time and tradeoffs developers had to make to ensure that blockchains were practical.

Read More: Vitalik Buterin Sells Two Meme Coins, Scores $114.7K in 13,889 USDC & 28.58 ETH

ZK-SNARKs Change the Cost Equation

The most significant one, as Buterin claims, is the maturation of zero-knowledge proof systems, particularly, ZK-SNARKs. Users can use such tools to check whether the blockchain state is accurate without having to re-run all the transactions in the history.

Buterin described this breakthrough as delivering “the benefits without the costs.” Users no longer have to decide between trust and massive computation, but can use cryptographic proofs to ensure that they are correct at an efficient rate. This, in his words, fundamentally reverses the tradeoffs that are acceptable.

Verification Without Replaying the Chain

ZK-SNARKs enable it to verify that the chain is valid without sacrificing the computational cost which once made self-verification impractical. In the case of Ethereum it opens the path to more robust guarantees related to decentralization with no usability or scaling trade-off.

Buterin holds that the ecosystem needs to have higher expectations and re-evaluate tradeoffs that were present in previous stages of blockchain development with better tools at hand.

Real-World Failures Shape Ethereum’s Philosophy

In addition to cryptography, Buterin stressed on what he learned when things did go wrong in the real world. Peer-to-peer networks may crash, latency may soar and long-established third-party service may just vanish. During such times, it is a weakness that the users rely on the developers or centralized infrastructure.

Other risks identified by him include validator concentration, plausible 51% attacks, and intermediary censorship and refers to incidents such as Tornado Cash restrictions as a reminder that direct chain access may become a necessity.

For Buterin, self-verification is not a daily requirement but a safety mechanism. The “Mountain Man’s cabin” is a retreat users can rely on when systems fail, and its existence alone improves the balance of power. He likened it to BitTorrent’s role in keeping streaming platforms honest.

The post Vitalik Retracts 2017 “Mountain Man” Take, Citing ZK-SNARKs as Ethereum’s Safety Net appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Ignites As Spot Volume Skyrockets

XRP Ignites As Spot Volume Skyrockets

XRP surprised this weekend with a sudden surge of +2,860% on its spot flows in barely eight hours. This historic peak, occurring in a quiet market, reignites speculation
Share
Coinstats2026/02/09 05:05
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Dogecoin (DOGE) and Shiba Inu (SHIB) Likely to Underperform as Capital Flows to New Token Set to Explode 19365%

Dogecoin (DOGE) and Shiba Inu (SHIB) Likely to Underperform as Capital Flows to New Token Set to Explode 19365%

The cryptocurrency market is entering a decisive phase, where legacy meme coins like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu continue to command recognition but may face diminishing returns compared to newer entrants. Capital flow data and presale activity suggest that investors are increasingly looking beyond the familiar names, with Little Pepe emerging as one of the most [...] The post Dogecoin (DOGE) and Shiba Inu (SHIB) Likely to Underperform as Capital Flows to New Token Set to Explode 19365% appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/18 04:00