WHEN A WALL of garbage gave way at Cebu City’s Binaliw landfill this month, killing dozens of workers, it revived memories of a disaster the Philippines had pledgedWHEN A WALL of garbage gave way at Cebu City’s Binaliw landfill this month, killing dozens of workers, it revived memories of a disaster the Philippines had pledged

Deadly Cebu landfill slide exposes gaps in waste oversight

2026/01/27 00:33
6 min read

By Vonn Andrei E. Villamiel

WHEN A WALL of garbage gave way at Cebu City’s Binaliw landfill this month, killing dozens of workers, it revived memories of a disaster the Philippines had pledged never to repeat.

At dawn on July 10, 2000, a towering mound of waste collapsed at the Payatas dumpsite in Quezon City after days of heavy rain. Homes were buried, fires broke out, and more than 200 people were killed.

The tragedy prompted a national reckoning and led to the passage exactly 25 years ago of the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act, which banned open dumps and ordered local governments to shift to safer disposal systems.

But the Binaliw collapse suggests that the country’s waste system remains vulnerable to the same failures of design, oversight and enforcement that caused the Payatas tragedy.

On Jan. 8, a massive garbage pile — estimated by local officials to be as tall as a 20-storey building — gave way at the landfill in the village of Binaliw, crushing a material recovery facility and trapping workers beneath tons of debris.

After 10 days of search operations, the Cebu City government confirmed 37 deaths, including one rescuer who later died from septic shock.

City officials cited prolonged rainfall, water-logged waste, and structural weaknesses as factors behind the collapse. Environmental advocates and local lawmakers say those explanations point to a deeper issue: a landfill system that exists largely on paper.

Binaliw is operated by Prime Waste Solutions, Inc., a unit of Prime Infra Capital, Inc. It is listed by the National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC) as a controlled sanitary landfill, one of 375 operating across the country. It serves Cebu City as well as the neighboring cities of Mandaue and Lapu-Lapu, receiving about 573 metric tons of waste daily.

‘LIKE A 20-STOREY BUILDING’
Cebu City Councilor Joel C. Garganera, who heads the council’s environment committee, said the facility functioned more like an open dumpsite.

“It is not the usual landfill where you dig the ground, put liners and stop once the waste reaches the surface or slightly above it,” Mr. Garganera told BusinessWorld. “What happened in Binaliw is that the garbage piled up like a 20-storey building.”

The garbage was stacked upward, relying on a hillside for support. The site was cut into a slope, with waste piled against it rather than embedded below ground, he said. That design, combined with poor drainage, made the landfill prone to saturation and collapse.

“This is an open dumpsite, and it’s like a sponge that absorbs water,” he said. “Even mountains made of rock experience landslides. What more a mountain made of garbage.”

Regulators had flagged issues at the site years before the collapse. In 2019, the Environmental Management Bureau (EMB) in Central Visayas issued violation notices to the landfill’s former operator for improper handling and missing monitoring reports. Prime Waste Solutions took over operations in 2023 and pledged upgrades, including an automated recovery facility.

Complaints persisted. Residents in nearby Consolacion raised concerns about water quality, suspecting groundwater contamination from leachate.

In August last year, Cebu City’s Solid Waste Management Board said the landfill violated the waste law by allowing untreated disposal, according to local media reports. No penalties were imposed at the time.

Operations were halted only after the Jan. 8 collapse, when the EMB issued a cease-and-desist order after an inspection.

Prime Waste Solutions did not respond to requests for comment.

OVERSIGHT GAPS
For environmental groups, Binaliw underscores how weak monitoring has undercut a law designed to prevent such disasters.

“The policy is there, including how landfills should be operated,” Ochie L. Tolentino, zero-waste campaigner at EcoWaste Coalition, told BusinessWorld by telephone in mixed English and Filipino. “However, the DENR (Department of Environment and Natural Resources) is lacking in terms of monitoring these waste facilities.”

Under the Solid Waste Management Act, landfill operators must submit regular reports to regulators, while the DENR is tasked with oversight. Ms. Tolentino said paperwork alone couldn’t capture on-the-ground risks.

“How can regulators verify these reports if there are no actual site inspections?” she asked.

Similar incidents have occurred since Payatas. In 2011, trash slides at dumpsites in Baguio City and Olongapo killed at least eight people after heavy rains. Yet open dumps have continued to operate.

As of 2021, the EMB reported that about 230 open dumpsites remained active nationwide, even as authorities said hundreds had been closed.

In a statement on Monday, the Environment department said it has formed an investigative body, including third-party representatives, to probe the Binaliw incident.

The agency also ordered a nationwide inspection of all operating sanitary landfills and directed its regional offices to enforce environmental compliance certificates and safety protocols.

“We are moving to ensure that facilities across the country adhere to the highest standards of safety and environmental protection,” Environment Secretary Raphael P.M. Lotilla said.

The pressure on landfills is growing. The Philippines generated about 60,700 metric tons of waste a day in 2025, according to NSWMC data. That figure is projected to exceed 63,500 tons a day by 2030 as cities expand and consumption rises.

Much of that waste still ends up buried. Less than 10% of plastic waste is recycled, while about a fifth leaks into waterways and the ocean, based on World Bank and DENR figures.

Marian Frances T. Ledesma, zero-waste campaigner for Greenpeace Philippines, said the system remains focused on disposal rather than prevention.

“The Philippines is experiencing a waste crisis with volumes of waste increasing and impacts worsening,” she said in an e-mailed reply to questions. “Our waste management system fails to address the problem at its source.”

The law requires local governments to reduce waste through segregation, recycling and composting. Organic material makes up about half of the country’s waste stream, yet diversion remains limited.

Poor segregation worsens landfill instability, Ms. Ledesma said. Organic waste increases moisture, while plastics reduce density, raising the risk of slides when heavy rains hit.

PLANS WITHOUT PRACTICE
Local governments must submit 10-year waste management plans. Data on the NSWMC website show about 60% of municipalities had approved plans, though council members say more recent figures put the rate above 80%.

“Having a waste management plan is one thing, but implementation is another,” Ms. Tolentino said. “Waste diversion should be closely monitored in the local government level to reduce the amount of trash going to landfills.”

Without reductions at source, landfills absorb the strain. In places like Binaliw, that strain became fatal.

For survivors of Payatas, the parallels are stark.

Leonora Dolores, who lived near the Quezon City dumpsite when it collapsed, said the sound of garbage giving way is something she would never forget. Two decades later, she said the lesson had not been learned.

“If the risks are already known, action should come before people die,” she said.

The Binaliw tragedy has reopened questions the country has faced since 2000: whether waste rules are enforced, whether landfills are built as designed and whether oversight keeps pace with growing volumes.

Until those gaps are addressed, environmental groups say, disasters like Payatas and Binaliw will remain a recurring risk rather than a closed chapter.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00