One study of adults receiving home-based primary care found that greater continuity of care was associated with a lower likelihood of home ambulance services, emergencyOne study of adults receiving home-based primary care found that greater continuity of care was associated with a lower likelihood of home ambulance services, emergency

Annals of Family Medicine: Two New Studies Examine Continuity of Care in Home-Based Primary Care and Patient Preferences

5 min read

One study of adults receiving home-based primary care found that greater continuity of care was associated with a lower likelihood of home ambulance services, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions. Another study examined patient preferences for visit type, speed of care, and continuity with their primary care physician.

PROVIDENCE, R.I. , Jan. 28, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Continuity of care is a defining feature of primary care. It refers to patients seeing and communicating with the same clinician, or care team, over time. That ongoing relationship can shape how patients experience care and how they use health services. Two studies published in the Annals of Family Medicine examine continuity in different contexts, including how continuity is associated with emergency and hospital service use among people receiving primary care at home, and how patients weigh seeing their own clinician alongside access and speed of care.

How Continuity Relates to Emergency and Hospital Use in Home-Based Care

In a population-based cohort study using electronic health record data from three primary health care centers in Barcelona, Spain, researchers analyzed 1,207 adults receiving permanent home-based primary care over a 12-month period. Patients had an average age of 88.5 years, and most had multiple chronic conditions. Continuity was measured as the proportion of visits, including telephone consultations, that patients had with their assigned general practitioner and primary health care nurse.

Compared with patients who had less than 50% continuity with their physician, seeing the assigned general practitioner for at least three out of four visits (≥75% continuity) was associated with a 31% lower hazard of home ambulance services, a 39% lower hazard of emergency department visits, and a 35% lower hazard of hospital admissions. For primary health care nurses, continuity of care was associated with a 31% lower hazard of home ambulance services and a 38% lower hazard of hospital admissions.

Patient Preferences for Visit Type, Speed, and Seeing Their Own Physician

Researchers from the University of Michigan analyzed 2,268 survey responses from adult patients in an academic family medicine clinic. Patients were asked to consider six common health concerns, such as new symptoms, medication questions, or mental health concerns, and choose among care options that varied by visit type, timing, and clinician. Options included a portal message with their own primary care physician within three days, a video visit with another physician in three to seven days, a video visit with their own physician in two weeks, or an in-person visit with their own physician in six weeks. Across all six scenarios, patients most often preferred a portal message from their own primary care physician within three days. A video visit with another clinic doctor in 3-7 days was consistently the second choice. The authors note important limitations, including that the study was conducted in a single care setting and may not be generalizable to all patient populations or health systems.

Primary care continues to evolve in complex ways. In patients receiving home-based care, higher continuity with assigned clinicians was associated with a lower likelihood of home ambulance services, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions. In a separate study, patient preference research shows that individuals place high importance on timely access, convenience, and rapid communication, as well as continuity with their primary care physician. Together, these findings highlight the challenge for primary care systems of supporting both continuity with trusted clinicians and timely access in ways that are sustainable for practices.

Articles Cited:

Effect of Continuity of Care on Emergency Care and Hospital Admissions Among Patients Receiving Home-Based Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Carmen Herranz, MSc, PhD; Luis González-de Paz, MSc, PhD; Alicia Borrás-Santos, MPH, PhD; Sofía Alvarez, RP; Bibiana Contreras, MD; Nuria García, RN; Elena Gómez, RN; Marta Navarro, MD; Amaya Serna, RN; Silvia Roura-Rovira, MSc; Jaume Benavent-Àreu, MD; and Antoni Sisó-Almirall, MD, PhD

Patient Valuation of Visit Types, Speed of Care, and Continuity With Primary Care Physicians: A Discrete-Choice Survey

Katherine J. Gold, MD, MSW, MS; Dongru Chen, MS; John Holkeboer, BA; Gregory Shumer, MD, MHSA; Lauren Marshall, MPH, MPP; Devon Kinney, MSQM; and Ananda Sen, PhD

Annals of Family Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed, indexed research journal that provides a cross-disciplinary forum for new, evidence-based information affecting the primary care disciplines. Launched in May 2003, Annals of Family Medicine is sponsored by six family medical organizations, including the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Board of Family Medicine, the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, the Association of Departments of Family Medicine, the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors, and the North American Primary Care Research Group. Annals of Family Medicine is published online six times each year, charges no fee for publication, and contains original research from the clinical, biomedical, social, and health services areas, as well as contributions on methodology and theory, selected reviews, essays, and editorials. Complete editorial content and interactive discussion groups for each published article can be accessed for free on the journal’s website, www.AnnFamMed.org.

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/annals-of-family-medicine-two-new-studies-examine-continuity-of-care-in-home-based-primary-care-and-patient-preferences-302672690.html

SOURCE Annals of Family Medicine

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35
Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Today we compare Pepeto (PEPETO), BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe (and how they stack up today) by the main […] The post Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:39
Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

BitcoinWorld Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal In a dramatic shift for one of cryptocurrency’s leading networks, Solana (
Share
bitcoinworld2026/02/05 06:45