Documents from the US Department of Justice suggest Epstein explored a potential $3 million Coinbase investment through Blockchain Capital in 2014 and may have Documents from the US Department of Justice suggest Epstein explored a potential $3 million Coinbase investment through Blockchain Capital in 2014 and may have

Epstein Documents Reveal Early Ties to Coinbase Investment

5 min read

Documents from the US Department of Justice suggest Epstein explored a potential $3 million Coinbase investment through Blockchain Capital in 2014 and may have later received and partially exited an allocation, though no wrongdoing has been alleged against Coinbase or its founders. Separately, Adam Back publicly denied any direct or indirect financial connection between Epstein and Blockstream, saying a fund linked to Joi Ito briefly held and later divested a minority stake.

Epstein Tied to Early Coinbase Deal

Recent speculation surrounding the so-called Epstein Files reignited scrutiny over the late American financier Jeffrey Epstein, this time focusing on his alleged early involvement with one of the crypto industry’s most well known companies. According to documents that were released by the US Department of Justice, Epstein discussed a potential $3 million investment in the crypto exchange Coinbase more than a decade ago, at a time when the company was still in its formative years.

Epstein Documents Reveal Early Ties to Coinbase Investment

Press release from the US Department of Justice

The documents indicate that Epstein’s interest in Coinbase was routed through Brock Pierce’s venture firm, Blockchain Capital, in 2014. While it is still unclear whether the initial investment was fully executed as originally discussed, the files contain extensive correspondence and internal discussion about the possibility of Epstein participating in the Coinbase funding round. 

Bitcoin researcher Kyle Torpey shared that the records show repeated references to the deal, even if final confirmation of its completion is not definitive in the earliest stages.

One of the more controversial elements revealed in the documents is the suggestion that the proposed investment may have secured Epstein a face-to-face meeting with Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam. A leaked email screenshot referenced “Jeff” in connection with a potential meeting, with Ehrsam reportedly indicating he had a short window available and questioning how important the meeting was to Epstein. 

The language of the email has fueled speculation that Ehrsam may have been aware of Epstein’s involvement, although no direct acknowledgment or endorsement is shown in the documents themselves.

Further correspondence from 2018 suggests that Epstein ultimately did receive a Coinbase allocation. According to the records, he later sold roughly half of that stake back to Blockchain Capital for an estimated $11 million. This revelation added to debates about early crypto funding sources and the backgrounds of some early investors during the industry’s formative period.

The new attention is particularly sensitive given Epstein’s criminal history. In 2008, a Florida state court convicted him of procuring a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution. While Coinbase and the individuals named have not been accused of any wrongdoing in relation to these documents, the disclosures still attracted some more questions about due diligence practices in early crypto venture capital.

Meanwhile, Blockstream CEO and co-founder Adam Back also recently publicly denied any ongoing financial or business relationship between Blockstream and Jeffrey Epstein. In a statement that was posted Sunday on X, Back said that “Blockstream has no direct nor indirect financial connection with Jeffrey Epstein, or his estate.”

Back’s comments came after the US Department of Justice released millions of pages of Epstein-related materials under a transparency initiative. The most recent batch of documents were made public on Jan. 30, and includes names of numerous individuals from the technology and finance sectors, though officials explained that appearing in the files does not by itself imply wrongdoing.

Among the newly surfaced records is a July 2014 email in which Blockstream co-founder Austin Hill discussed the company’s seed funding round with Epstein and Joi Ito, who was then director of the MIT Media Lab. Back was included in the email chain. 

In that message, Hill described the round as heavily oversubscribed and referenced increasing an allocation linked to Epstein and Ito, while also expressing interest in meeting face to face again.

Other unsealed documents reference travel arrangements that included the names of Back and Hill, with bookings to St. Thomas, an island located near Epstein’s private compound. In one exchange, Hill suggested arranging independent flights after St. Thomas. Back’s public statement did not address the travel-related emails, though Hill later reposted Back’s comments on social media.

Adam Back

In his explanation, Back said Blockstream was introduced to Ito during its 2014 investor roadshow and later met Epstein, who was presented as a limited partner in Ito’s investment fund. That fund subsequently took a minority stake in Blockstream, but Back said it later divested the shares due to concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Despite this clarification, critics on social media questioned the timing of Back’s response and called for more clarity about the nature of past interactions.

The documents also show Epstein expressing views on the crypto sector more broadly. In one 2014 email exchange with venture capitalist Peter Thiel, Epstein discussed differing interpretations of Bitcoin’s purpose and value. Separate records reveal that Epstein even floated proposals for new digital currencies in the Middle East, including a Sharia-compliant digital currency modeled on Bitcoin.

Other well known people named in the files include Kevin Warsh, recently nominated by Donald Trump as Federal Reserve chair, and Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Markets await Fed’s first 2025 cut, experts bet “this bull market is not even close to over”

Markets await Fed’s first 2025 cut, experts bet “this bull market is not even close to over”

Will the Fed’s first rate cut of 2025 fuel another leg higher for Bitcoin and equities, or does September’s history point to caution? First rate cut of 2025 set against a fragile backdrop The Federal Reserve is widely expected to…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 00:27
Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27