The post Onyxcoin Price Extends Month-Long Crash — Another 65% Drop? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price is down nearly 2% in the past 24 hours The post Onyxcoin Price Extends Month-Long Crash — Another 65% Drop? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price is down nearly 2% in the past 24 hours

Onyxcoin Price Extends Month-Long Crash — Another 65% Drop?

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Onyxcoin price is down nearly 2% in the past 24 hours and remains locked in a steep downtrend. Between January 6 and February 6, XCN lost close to two-thirds of its value. After briefly rebounding from $0.0045 to $0.0059, the XCN price has started weakening again. On-chain data shows accelerating holder exits, while only one major support zone is still holding.

The question now is whether this is just consolidation or the start of another deep sell-off.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Bear Flag Breakdown Keeps Downside Pressure Intact

Onyxcoin’s recent rebound has formed inside a bear flag pattern on the daily chart. A bear flag appears when a sharp decline is followed by a weak, narrow rebound. It usually signals continuation, not recovery. In XCN’s case, the drop from early January to early February created the flagpole. The move toward $0.0059 formed the flag.

Recently, the XCN price slipped below the lower boundary of this structure.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

Onyxcoin Price Structure: TradingView

This breakdown suggests that buyers failed to regain control after the rebound. Instead of building momentum, selling pressure resumed. When bear flags fail, the next decline often mirrors the size of the first move. With XCN already down around 65% from January levels (pole’s height), this structure keeps downside risk elevated.

Whether this weakness is reversed by a move back inside the flag, or confirmed by a sustained breakdown, now depends on on-chain behavior.

Holder Exodus Accelerates While Whales Show Fragile Confidence

On-chain data shows that long-term investors are leaving faster.

Sponsored

Sponsored

This is reflected in Hodler Net Position Change, which tracks whether wallets holding coins for more than 155 days are accumulating or distributing over 30 days. When the metric is negative, long-term holders are selling.

On February 6, this figure stood near -34 million XCN. By February 9, it had widened to roughly -47.8 million XCN. That represents a rise in net selling of about 40% in just a few days. This shows that conviction holders are accelerating exits.

XCN Holders: Glassnode

These are not short-term traders. These are usually investors who held through earlier cycles. When this group starts distributing aggressively, it usually reflects weakening confidence in future recovery.

Whale behavior adds another layer to the story. Large wallets reduced their holdings sharply after February 6, falling from about 52.55 billion XCN to around 48.60 billion. That was a major exit during the prior consolidation. However, holdings have since edged up slightly to around 48.78 billion.

Whales In Action: Santiment

Sponsored

Sponsored

This small recovery suggests limited dip buying. Whales are not fully abandoning the market. But they are not rebuilding aggressively either. Their partial re-entry appears linked to one remaining support level that could still hold.

If that level fails, this fragile optimism may disappear. To understand why whales are hesitating, we need to look at where most holders possibly bought.

Cost Basis and Onyxcoin Price Levels Show the Last Line of Defense

Cost basis heat maps show where large holders possibly accumulated tokens. These zones often act as support when price revisits them. For Onyxcoin, most major cost clusters have already failed.

Support near $0.0053 and $0.0052 has been broken. The only significant remaining cluster sits near $0.0050, where nearly 3.9 billion XCN are concentrated. This makes $0.0050 the final major demand zone.

Cost Basis Heatmap: Glassnode

Sponsored

Sponsored

Holders who bought near this level are close to break-even. As long as the price stays above it, they may hold. If it breaks, many will move into losses and may rush to exit due to the lack of conviction and fear of an extended breakdown.

That is where cascading risk emerges. When a major cost basis cluster fails, neutral holders become underwater. Selling accelerates. Liquidity weakens. Fear spreads. This often leads to sharp follow-through declines. The Onyxcoin price structure aligns closely with this data.

Right now, XCN must hold above $0.0050 to avoid further damage. A sustained break below it would confirm the bear flag breakdown and validate continuation lower.

Onyxcoin Price Analysis: TradingView

If that happens, the next major targets sit near $0.0025 and $0.0017. On the upside, recovery remains difficult.

To regain short-term stability, XCN needs to reclaim $0.0057. Above that, $0.0070 and $0.0081 mark key resistance zones. These were former breakdown levels where selling intensified. Full invalidation of the bearish structure would require a move above $0.0099. Until then, rallies are likely to remain corrective.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/onyxcoin-price-prediction-65-percent-crash/

Market Opportunity
ONYXCOIN Logo
ONYXCOIN Price(XCN)
$0.006179
$0.006179$0.006179
+13.09%
USD
ONYXCOIN (XCN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nvidia (NVDA) vs AMD: The Ultimate AI Stock Showdown for 2025

Nvidia (NVDA) vs AMD: The Ultimate AI Stock Showdown for 2025

Nvidia (NVDA) dominates AI chips with superior margins and ecosystem. AMD challenges but trails. Compare both stocks to determine your best AI investment. The post
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/15 19:42
New Research Paper: Why Ripple Will Never Abandon XRP

New Research Paper: Why Ripple Will Never Abandon XRP

Crypto researcher SMQKE has shared excerpts from an academic publication to support the argument that XRP will remain integral to Ripple Labs’ operation. In a post
Share
Timestabloid2026/03/15 19:02