The Solv Protocol exploit resulted in approximately $2.5M in losses after an attacker exploited a logic flaw in the BitcoinReserveOffering contract. The vulnerabilityThe Solv Protocol exploit resulted in approximately $2.5M in losses after an attacker exploited a logic flaw in the BitcoinReserveOffering contract. The vulnerability

Solv Protocol $2.5M Exploit: Double Mint Bug

2026/03/09 17:05
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The Solv Protocol exploit resulted in approximately $2.5M in losses after an attacker exploited a logic flaw in the BitcoinReserveOffering contract. The vulnerability allowed the attacker to mint BRO tokens twice during a single mint flow, leading to massive token inflation.

The issue stemmed from an interaction between the NFT transfer process and the onERC721Received callback. By triggering token minting inside the callback and then receiving another mint when execution returned to the main mint() function, the attacker was able to create unbacked BRO tokens.

How the Exploit Happened?

The attacker began with 135 BRO tokens, which were burned through the reserve contract. In return, the protocol issued a small amount of GOEFS tokens based on the current exchange rate.

Using these tokens, the attacker initiated a mint transaction, sending GOEFS tokens along with a specific NFT. When the NFT was transferred, the contract triggered the onERC721Received callback, which internally executed the _mint function and issued BRO tokens to the attacker.

However, after the callback finished, the contract returned to the original mint() function and minted tokens again for the same action. This unintended behavior resulted in double minting.

Token Inflation in a Single Transaction

The attacker repeatedly triggered this mint flow 22 times within a single transaction. Because the entire exploit occurred in one transaction, the exchange rate remained constant, allowing the attacker to repeatedly double the minted tokens.

Through this process, the attacker inflated their holdings from 135 BRO tokens to approximately 567 million BRO tokens.

Converting the Exploit Into Profit

Once the tokens were minted, the attacker converted part of the inflated supply into real assets. Around 165M BRO tokens were swapped through the BRO–SolvBTC exchange, and then routed through Uniswap V3, eventually converting the assets into 1211 ETH.

The remaining tokens remained in the attacker’s wallet.

Following the swaps, the extracted ETH was transferred to multiple attacker-controlled wallets and eventually deposited into RailGun, a privacy protocol used to obscure transaction trails.

Root Cause

The exploit was caused by a logic flaw in the minting flow.

During NFT transfers, the contract triggered a callback (onERC721Received) that already executed a mint. When execution returned to the mint() function, the contract minted tokens again without validating whether minting had already occurred.

This lack of validation allowed the attacker to repeatedly mint tokens and inflate supply within a single transaction.

Why This Matters?

The Solv Protocol exploit highlights how small logic flaws in smart contract flows can lead to catastrophic token inflation. Improper handling of external calls, callbacks, and state updates can introduce subtle vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit at scale.


Solv Protocol $2.5M Exploit: Double Mint Bug was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Market Opportunity
Solv Protocol Logo
Solv Protocol Price(SOLV)
$0.004179
$0.004179$0.004179
+0.60%
USD
Solv Protocol (SOLV) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

When the Middle East burns, the Filipino nanay feels the heat

When the Middle East burns, the Filipino nanay feels the heat

(Part 1 of 2) On Feb. 28, the world watched as the US-Israel coalition launched coordinated airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, which also
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/16 00:03
The Hidden Costs of a Smart Home: How to Calculate Your Real Electricity Usage

The Hidden Costs of a Smart Home: How to Calculate Your Real Electricity Usage

You just finished setting up your smart home. The lights respond to your voice. The thermostat adjusts itself. The security cameras check in every few minutes.
Share
Techbullion2026/03/16 02:35
Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

The post Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The suitcoiners are in town.  From a low-key, circular podium in the middle of a lavish New York City event hall, Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor took the mic and opened the Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference event. He joked awkwardly about the orange ties, dresses, caps and other merch to the (mostly male) audience of who’s-who in the bitcoin treasury company world.  Once he got onto the regular beat, it was much of the same: calm and relaxed, speaking freely and with confidence, his keynote was heavy on the metaphors and larger historical stories. Treasury companies are like Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in its early years, Michael Saylor said: We’ve just discovered crude oil and now we’re making sense of the myriad ways in which we can use it — the automobile revolution and jet fuel is still well ahead of us.  Established, trillion-dollar companies not using AI because of “security concerns” make them slow and stupid — just like companies and individuals rejecting digital assets now make them poor and weak.  “I’d like to think that we understood our business five years ago; we didn’t.”  We went from a defensive investment into bitcoin, Saylor said, to opportunistic, to strategic, and finally transformational; “only then did we realize that we were different.” Michael Saylor: You Come Into My Financial History House?! Jokes aside, Michael Saylor is very welcome to the warm waters of our financial past. He acquitted himself honorably by invoking the British Consol — though mispronouncing it, and misdating it to the 1780s; Pelham’s consolidation of debts happened in the 1750s and perpetual government debt existed well before then — and comparing it to the gold standard and the future of bitcoin. He’s right that Strategy’s STRC product in many ways imitates the consols; irredeemable, perpetual debt, issued at par, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:12