JOSH SAFDIE’S Marty Supreme takes its cue from its central character: brassy, loud, unrelentingly annoying, chronicling the life of one Marty Mauser, a nascent JOSH SAFDIE’S Marty Supreme takes its cue from its central character: brassy, loud, unrelentingly annoying, chronicling the life of one Marty Mauser, a nascent

Bounce

2026/03/13 00:09
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Movie Review
Marty Supreme
Directed by Josh Safdie

JOSH SAFDIE’S Marty Supreme takes its cue from its central character: brassy, loud, unrelentingly annoying, chronicling the life of one Marty Mauser, a nascent shoe salesman and up-and-coming ping-pong player. Marty, to put it mildly, likes to burn both ends of his candle: he hustles players at the local bar; hustles his rich friend Dion (Luke Manley) to finance production of orange ping-pong balls with his name printed on them; hustles his married friend Rachel (Odessa A’zion) for sex at the shoe store’s back room; hustles his Uncle Murray (Larry Sloman) for $700 to help finance a trip to the British Open in London — to be fair Uncle Murray’s hustling Marty too, trying to manipulate the young man into staying on as salesman while having an affair with Marty’s mother Rebecca (Fran Drescher).

Timothée Chalamet trades in his Kwisatch Haderach stillsuit for a long-sleeved blouse, unbuttoned to reveal the sweat-soaked undershirt, and glues a dead caterpillar to his upper lip the way I assume Guy Gardner likes to sport a bowl cut — to declare “fuck you!” at anyone who dares object to his grating personality. It’s perfect; like him or not as an actor, have to admit this role fits Chalamet’s less-than-charming persona to a T, down to the nipples standing defiantly erect through the thin cotton.

It’s a vibe, I suppose. Helps that Darius Khondji is the cinematographer, with his shadowed aesthetic developed from his time with Jean-Pierre Jeunet (Delicatessen, City of Lost Children, Alien Resurrection), through his time developing the look and feel of David Fincher’s signature features (Se7en, Panic Room), to his time applying richly textured layers to James Gray’s visual palette (The Immigrant, The Lost City of Z, Armageddon Time), to his time illuminating the Safdie brothers’ shaky-cam aesthetic (Uncut Gems, this film), lending them more gravitas and solemn beauty than they actually deserve. For this production, Khondji adds a sumptuous glow about Chalamet’s tousle-haired head, suggesting he’s more “Fast” Eddie Felson than Ratso Rizzo (we’re not totally fooled, but Khondji for a few moments at a time manages to leave us confused).

It also helps that the legendary Jack Fisk is the production designer — he grew up in 1950s Illinois, is adept at creating worlds set in the past (Badlands, Days of Heaven, The Thin Red Line, Killers of the Flower Moon), the relative present (The Straight Story, Carrie, Mulholland Drive), and the nightmarish subconscious (Eraserhead). Fisk’s work here is so immersive I can believe it helped settle and modulate Safdie’s usually frenetic camerawork, from the near-incomprehensible near-hysterical gibberish Adam Sandler spouted in Uncut Gems to the comparatively sedate rat-tat-tat delivery of 1930s screwball comedies (transposed here to early ’50s).

Does the film work? To a point. It wants to be The Hustler, to beat that film at its own game of taking up a relatively lightweight game (billiards) by employing a sport even lighter in weight (table tennis) to pronounce on matters as momentous (At what point does selling one’s honor, dignity, soul for the umpteenth time become too much? Who in this dog eat dog world does one care about, dig in one’s heels for, and why?), but lacks Robert Rossen’s lean elegant visual storytelling, lacks the dark Mephistophelean figure played by George C. Scott as counterweight. Marty stands alone in a world of fools and suckers and that I suspect is how Chalamet (who’s never been shy on the subject of his ego) likes it, and that’s likely why this film fails to touch its intended level.

This Marty isn’t even half as interesting as the real deal — Marty Reisman, on whom Chalamet’s character is loosely based, was a table tennis player from the age of nine, won his first city championship at the age of 13; he hustled for money and, yes, toured the world as the opening comedy act for the Harlem Globetrotters, often visiting Hong Kong, and (a detail omitted from the film) smuggled gold and Rolex watches out of Asia into the United States. He won the 1997 US National Hardbat Championship at the age of 67, and in 2008 demonstrated on the Late Show with David Letterman that he could split a cigarette with a ping pong ball. On archival video footage Reisman looks improbable, with limbs longer and lankier than Chalamet’s (you can believe he can cover a ping pong table with arms outstretched), his onscreen manner is far more charming and charismatic — if he ever approached me for financing production of thousands of orange ping pong balls with his name printed on them, I’d seriously consider his proposal.

This isn’t Safdie’s best work either — that would be Uncut Gems, co-directed with his brother Benny, in a milieu the brothers grew up in (the New York Diamond District), with real stakes (loan sharks, a gambling addiction, a crumbling marriage, millions in rings and gems and unsecured loans), with Adam Sandler sweating the kind of desperation Chalamet can only fantasize about. I am usually not a fan of the smash-n-grab handheld frenetically cut style the Safdies excel at but in this one case they may actually have a point, and so does the film — an icepick of a point, driven into your skull between your eyes.

And this isn’t even the ultimate table tennis saga — that would be Masaaki Yuasa’s Ping Pong: the Animation, with visuals that make the Safdies look like on quaaludes, and a narrative that goes into power dynamics, players’ psychology, the significance of the sport to various countries’ cultures (specifically Japan and China), the pitfalls and virtues of both victory and defeat. Would I consider Marty supreme? Wouldn’t call it bad, but would definitely rank it fourth.

Market Opportunity
Ping Logo
Ping Price(PING)
$0.001718
$0.001718$0.001718
+3.74%
USD
Ping (PING) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nvidia (NVDA) vs AMD: The Ultimate AI Stock Showdown for 2025

Nvidia (NVDA) vs AMD: The Ultimate AI Stock Showdown for 2025

Nvidia (NVDA) dominates AI chips with superior margins and ecosystem. AMD challenges but trails. Compare both stocks to determine your best AI investment. The post
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/15 19:42
New Research Paper: Why Ripple Will Never Abandon XRP

New Research Paper: Why Ripple Will Never Abandon XRP

Crypto researcher SMQKE has shared excerpts from an academic publication to support the argument that XRP will remain integral to Ripple Labs’ operation. In a post
Share
Timestabloid2026/03/15 19:02