The post CLARITY Act Should Ban Stablecoin Yields to Advance in Senate, French Hill Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. French Hill, the Chairman of the HouseThe post CLARITY Act Should Ban Stablecoin Yields to Advance in Senate, French Hill Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. French Hill, the Chairman of the House

CLARITY Act Should Ban Stablecoin Yields to Advance in Senate, French Hill Says

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

French Hill, the Chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, has signaled that the CLARITY Act should ban stablecoin yields to gain bipartisan support and pass in the Senate. This comes as banks and the crypto industry continue to clash over whether third-party crypto firms should distribute stablecoin rewards to users.

French Hill Signals Senate Should Ban Stablecoin Yields In CLARITY Act

In an interview on FOX Business, Hill signaled that the Senate should follow the House’s lead in handling the crypto bill by banning stablecoin yields. This came as he noted that the House passed both the GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act on a bipartisan basis by agreeing that stablecoins should not pay yield.

The congressman said that stablecoins are just a payment device, which consumers use on a blockchain, suggesting that yields should not be the focus as they look to pass this crypto bill. He also noted that the GENIUS Act clearly bans stablecoin yields and provides that bank and non-bank stablecoin issuers should gain the same treatment on sales practices, capital requirements, and supervision.

As such, he opined that the CLARITY Act can resolve the issue of stablecoin yields and put the debate to bed. The congressman’s statement echoes his earlier remarks at the Milken Institute’s Future of Finance event, where he urged the Senate to adopt the House’s version of the crypto bill to make progress.

Hill also recommended that the issue of whether bank and non-bank stablecoin issuers should pay yields should be addressed in the regulatory proposal that the U.S. Treasury has come up with to implement the GENIUS Act. His comment comes as banks and the crypto industry are yet to agree on whether the crypto bill should allow third-party firms to pay stablecoin rewards to users.

The White House has proposed a draft text that limits stablecoin rewards to certain transactions and bans paying rewards on balances. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt recently slammed banks for the CLARITY Act delay, stating that they were looking to turn the crypto bill into an anti-competition bill.

Expert Says Crypto Bill Unlikely To Pass

In an interview on the Thinking Crypto Podcast, Austin Campbell, founder of Zero Knowledge Consulting, said that the CLARITY Act is unlikely to pass in the Senate. He noted that bills involving political fights between large constituencies, as between banks and crypto in this case, tend not to pass.

He suggested that the Senate is always cautious about picking sides when this happens and prefers to set the bill aside until both parties can reach a compromise. With both sides yet to reach a compromise, a March markup for the bill is now looking less likely.

Notably, Senate Majority Leader John Thune said that the CLARITY Act is unlikely to pass out of the committee before April. Thune and other Republicans are currently seeking to advance the Save America Act, which could also delay the crypto bill’s progress. Meanwhile, Trump has threatened not to sign any bill until the Save Act passes.

With the crypto bill currently facing several roadblocks, crypto traders are reducing their bets on its passage this year. Polymarket data shows that the odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law this year have dropped to 55%.

Source: Polymarket

Source: https://coingape.com/clarity-act-should-ban-stablecoin-yields-to-advance-in-senate-french-hill-says/

Market Opportunity
The AI Prophecy Logo
The AI Prophecy Price(ACT)
$0.01379
$0.01379$0.01379
-0.93%
USD
The AI Prophecy (ACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nvidia (NVDA) vs AMD: The Ultimate AI Stock Showdown for 2025

Nvidia (NVDA) vs AMD: The Ultimate AI Stock Showdown for 2025

Nvidia (NVDA) dominates AI chips with superior margins and ecosystem. AMD challenges but trails. Compare both stocks to determine your best AI investment. The post
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/15 19:42
New Research Paper: Why Ripple Will Never Abandon XRP

New Research Paper: Why Ripple Will Never Abandon XRP

Crypto researcher SMQKE has shared excerpts from an academic publication to support the argument that XRP will remain integral to Ripple Labs’ operation. In a post
Share
Timestabloid2026/03/15 19:02