Key Takeaways: An alleged exploit on Venus Protocol enabled a wallet to borrow about $3.7 million in crypto assets on the illiquid $THE token as security. The speechKey Takeaways: An alleged exploit on Venus Protocol enabled a wallet to borrow about $3.7 million in crypto assets on the illiquid $THE token as security. The speech

Venus Protocol Suspected of $3.7M Flash-Loan Attack

2026/03/16 23:48
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Key Takeaways:

  • An alleged exploit on Venus Protocol enabled a wallet to borrow about $3.7 million in crypto assets on the illiquid $THE token as security.
  • The speech had taken out BTCB, CAKE and WBNB and was put into liquidation as collateral value declined.
  • It is estimated that there is potential bad debt in the tune of $1.7M-$2M which is primarily related to the CAKE lending market.

Weird lending behavior in Venus Protocol has triggered panic throughout the BNB Chain DeFi environment. Analysts of blockchains found a huge collateral holding of the thinly traded token, $THE, that purportedly allowed a wallet to draw millions of crypto assets prior to the onset of liquidation proceedings.

Venus Protocol shows Suspicious Borrowing Activity

The incident went public on March 15, when on-chain observers noted abnormal activity that related to wallet 0x1a35bd28efd46cfc46c2136f87877d69ae16231. The speech allegedly has put a huge amount of $THE tokens into lending markets of Venus Protocol and took the latter as collateral to borrow other digital-assets.

The information you can see on BscScan and DeFi analytics sites suggests that the wallet obtained the following:

  • 20 BTCB, valued near $1.43 million
  • 1.5 million CAKE which is approximately $2.18 million.
  • Around 200 WBNB, valued at about $132,000

The transactions sum up to around $3.7 million borrowed assets.

Read More: XRP Outspaces BNB to be the Third-Largest Cryptocurrency in the World

Illiquid Token Collateral Suspected in Price Manipulation

According to community analysts, the exploit was probably based on the manipulation of the value of the $THE token, which is rather not liquid. It was reported that the attacker provided between 8.8 million and over 50 million THE tokens as collateral.

Due to the limited trading depth of the token, analysts believe that the attacker artificially increased the market price of the token in a matter of time by trades or flash-loans. The reason is that inflated prices boosted the value of collateral of the Venus Protocol.

The wallet obtained an increased borrowing power and borrowed assets including CAKE, BTCB and BNB as the collateral seemed more valuable.

After the token price stabilized, the position itself was undercollateralized, and the liquidation mechanisms were set off throughout the protocol.

Tens of millions of THE tokens have now gone into liquidation lines as the collateral position failed.

Venus Team Investigates as Bad Debt Emerges

In a statement to the press, Venus Protocol substantiated the occurrence by stating that it had detected some abnormal activity with the $THE pool. The team suggests that the problem is currently confined to THE markets and CAKE markets, and there are no indications of a wider breach of the protocol in terms of smart contracts.

Nevertheless, the platform has not shut down the entire protocol, even when the investigation continues.

Early community projections indicate that Venus could now be exposed to bad debt of between $1.7 million and $2 million, most of which is the CAKE market related positions.

The wallet of the suspected exploiter is still accessible on BNB Chain and assets taken as a loan can still be observed on-chain as analysts keep watching the actions.

Read More: Grayscale Files for Spot BNB ETF as $118B Token Targets U.S. Public Markets

The post Venus Protocol Suspected of $3.7M Flash-Loan Attack appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Trump sets stage for a 'post-America world': NYT reporter

Trump sets stage for a 'post-America world': NYT reporter

When Joe Biden was elected president, he frequently asserted that “America was back” and collaborating with allies again. But the fact that the United States would
Share
Alternet2026/03/24 23:03
Ledger Secures $50M in Strategic Secondary Share Sale, Bolstering Crypto Security Leadership

Ledger Secures $50M in Strategic Secondary Share Sale, Bolstering Crypto Security Leadership

BitcoinWorld Ledger Secures $50M in Strategic Secondary Share Sale, Bolstering Crypto Security Leadership In a significant move within the cryptocurrency security
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 23:15