The post Bitcoin (BTC) Treasury Analysis: Doubts on SPACs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Has the PIPE model failed for bitcoin treasury companies? The collapse in the share prices for two notable recently closed deals — KindlyMD (NAKA) and Strive (ASST) suggests as much. A PIPE, or Private Investment in Public Equity, is a financing mechanism where institutional investors purchase shares directly from a publicly traded company at a pre-determined price, typically below market value, which allows the company to raise capital at a much faster rate without the lengthy and costly process of a traditional public offering. PIPE transactions are often used by companies undergoing reverse mergers or going public via special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC), and they have recently become a preferred funding strategy among bitcoin treasury companies looking to rapidly expand their bitcoin holdings. Despite their best efforts, recent examples suggest that the PIPE model is not just struggling to deliver shareholder value but also incinerating investor capital at a speedy rate. This feature is part of CoinDesk’s Bitcoin Treasuries Theme Week, sponsored by Genius Group. A case study for PIPE The company to embrace a PIPE was healthcare company KindlyMD (NAKA), which completed a reverse merger in May 2025, resulting in bitcoin treasury company Nakomoto becoming a wholly owned subsidiary and well-known bitcoin advocate David Bailey becoming the CEO. Pivotal to this transaction was a PIPE financing deal that raised $563 million in gross proceeds to mostly fund bitcoin purchases. Additionally, the company issued a $200 million senior secured convertible note to Yorkville Advisors, which was later closed and replaced with another note. This took the total financing for NAKA to $763 million. The terms of the PIPE were as follows: the initial round raised $510 million at $1.12 per share in May, followed by an additional $51.5 million at $5 per share in June. These funds were deployed to accumulate bitcoin,… The post Bitcoin (BTC) Treasury Analysis: Doubts on SPACs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Has the PIPE model failed for bitcoin treasury companies? The collapse in the share prices for two notable recently closed deals — KindlyMD (NAKA) and Strive (ASST) suggests as much. A PIPE, or Private Investment in Public Equity, is a financing mechanism where institutional investors purchase shares directly from a publicly traded company at a pre-determined price, typically below market value, which allows the company to raise capital at a much faster rate without the lengthy and costly process of a traditional public offering. PIPE transactions are often used by companies undergoing reverse mergers or going public via special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC), and they have recently become a preferred funding strategy among bitcoin treasury companies looking to rapidly expand their bitcoin holdings. Despite their best efforts, recent examples suggest that the PIPE model is not just struggling to deliver shareholder value but also incinerating investor capital at a speedy rate. This feature is part of CoinDesk’s Bitcoin Treasuries Theme Week, sponsored by Genius Group. A case study for PIPE The company to embrace a PIPE was healthcare company KindlyMD (NAKA), which completed a reverse merger in May 2025, resulting in bitcoin treasury company Nakomoto becoming a wholly owned subsidiary and well-known bitcoin advocate David Bailey becoming the CEO. Pivotal to this transaction was a PIPE financing deal that raised $563 million in gross proceeds to mostly fund bitcoin purchases. Additionally, the company issued a $200 million senior secured convertible note to Yorkville Advisors, which was later closed and replaced with another note. This took the total financing for NAKA to $763 million. The terms of the PIPE were as follows: the initial round raised $510 million at $1.12 per share in May, followed by an additional $51.5 million at $5 per share in June. These funds were deployed to accumulate bitcoin,…

Bitcoin (BTC) Treasury Analysis: Doubts on SPACs

2025/10/17 18:36

Has the PIPE model failed for bitcoin treasury companies? The collapse in the share prices for two notable recently closed deals — KindlyMD (NAKA) and Strive (ASST) suggests as much.

A PIPE, or Private Investment in Public Equity, is a financing mechanism where institutional investors purchase shares directly from a publicly traded company at a pre-determined price, typically below market value, which allows the company to raise capital at a much faster rate without the lengthy and costly process of a traditional public offering.

PIPE transactions are often used by companies undergoing reverse mergers or going public via special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC), and they have recently become a preferred funding strategy among bitcoin treasury companies looking to rapidly expand their bitcoin holdings.

Despite their best efforts, recent examples suggest that the PIPE model is not just struggling to deliver shareholder value but also incinerating investor capital at a speedy rate.

This feature is part of CoinDesk’s Bitcoin Treasuries Theme Week, sponsored by Genius Group.

A case study for PIPE

The company to embrace a PIPE was healthcare company KindlyMD (NAKA), which completed a reverse merger in May 2025, resulting in bitcoin treasury company Nakomoto becoming a wholly owned subsidiary and well-known bitcoin advocate David Bailey becoming the CEO. Pivotal to this transaction was a PIPE financing deal that raised $563 million in gross proceeds to mostly fund bitcoin purchases.

Additionally, the company issued a $200 million senior secured convertible note to Yorkville Advisors, which was later closed and replaced with another note. This took the total financing for NAKA to $763 million.

The terms of the PIPE were as follows: the initial round raised $510 million at $1.12 per share in May, followed by an additional $51.5 million at $5 per share in June.

These funds were deployed to accumulate bitcoin, with NAKA purchasing 21 BTC for $2.3 million in July and a further 5,743 BTC for $679 million in August.
Despite the rapid accumulation of bitcoin, the company’s market performance hasn’t followed suit.

Since the reverse merger back in May, NAKA’s stock has fallen by more than 95% from highs of $30 to the current $0.80. Its market net asset value (mNAV) has also slipped below 1, indicating that the market now values the company at less than the worth of its underlying bitcoin and assets.

The second company to adopt a PIPE strategy was Strive (ASST), founded by Vivek Ramaswamy, which merged with Asset Entities through a SPAC deal announced in May and completed in September.

Strive raised $750 million in gross proceeds through a PIPE priced at $1.35 per share, representing a 121% premium to ASST’s pre-merger share price.

The proceeds funded the purchase of 5,885 BTC, and the structure was entirely debt-free. In addition to the PIPE, Strive announced a $450 million equity shelf offering and a $500 million share buyback plan intended to counteract dilution.

The company also inked an all-stock deal to acquire another bitcoin treasury company trading at a discount to the value of its stack — Semler Scientific and its 5,048 bitcoin.

If approved, the pending acquisition of Semler Scientific would increase Strive’s bitcoin holdings to 11,700 BTC. Despite these moves, ASST’s stock performance has mirrored that of NAKA, plummeting more than 90% from its all-time high in May, as high as $12, now trading around $1 per share. Similar to NAKA, ASST’s mNAV is just below 1.

Caution is the word going forward

The desultory performance of NAKA and ASST calls into question at least two other bitcoin treasury SPAC/PIPE deals yet to be completed.

One of them is the merger between Twenty One Capital (XXI) — led by Jack Mallers — and Cantor Equity Partners (CEP). The firm announced its PIPE transaction back in April, becoming the third-largest bitcoin treasury firm with holdings of 43,514 BTC. Like the previous PIPE-driven deals, initial post-merger enthusiasm sent CEP’s share price higher from $10 to $60, but shares have now retreated to around $20.

In addition, Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), led by Adam Back, plans to go public through a SPAC merger with another Cantor vehicle (CEPO) and aims to raise a total of $3.5 billion, with up to $1.5 billion via a PIPE, expected to launch in Q4.

CEPO shares peaked at $16 in the initial excitement after the announcement and have since retreated to the $10.50 area.

In a nutshell, what these deals show is that while PIPEs are a way to fast-track financing for bitcoin treasury firms, they are also a potentially risky investments that warrant caution.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/10/14/the-rise-and-mostly-fall-of-the-pipe-model-in-bitcoin-treasury-strategies

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

On-chain fee report for the first half of 2025: 1,124 protocols achieved profitability, with revenue exceeding $20 billion.

On-chain fee report for the first half of 2025: 1,124 protocols achieved profitability, with revenue exceeding $20 billion.

Author: 1kx network Compiled by: Tim, PANews 1kx has released its most comprehensive on-chain revenue report to date for the crypto market: the "1kx On-Chain Revenue Report (First Half of 2025)". The report compiles verified on-chain fee data from over 1,200 protocols, clearly depicting user payment paths, value flows, and the core factors driving growth. Why are on-chain fees so important? Because this is the most direct signal of genuine payment demand: On-chain ecosystem = open, global, and has investment value Off-chain ecosystem = restricted, mature Data comparison reveals development trends: on-chain application fees increased by 126% year-on-year, while off-chain fees only increased by 15%. How large is the market? In 2020, on-chain activity was still in the experimental stage, but by 2025 it will have developed into a real-time measurable $20 billion economy. Users are paying for hundreds of application scenarios: transactions, buying and selling, data storage, cross-application collaboration, and we have counted 1,124 protocols that have achieved on-chain profitability this year. How are the fees generated? DeFi remains a core pillar, contributing 63% of total fees, but the industry landscape is rapidly evolving: The wallet business (which surged 260% year-on-year) has transformed the user interface into a profit center. Consumer apps (200% growth) directly monetize user traffic. DePIN (which surged 400%) brings computing power and connectivity services onto the blockchain. Does the on-chain economy truly exist? Although the total cost did not exceed the 2021 peak, the ecological health is stronger than before: At that time, on-chain fees accounted for over 40% of ETH transactions; now, transaction costs have decreased by 86%. The number of profitable agreements increased eightfold. Token holders' dividends hit a record high What are the core driving factors? The asset price determines the on-chain fees denominated in USD, which is in line with expectations, but the following should be noted: Price fluctuations trigger seasonal cycles 21 years later, application costs and valuations show a strong causal relationship (increased costs drive up valuations). The influence of on-chain factors in specific tracks is significant. Who is the winner? The top 20 protocols account for 70% of the total fees, but the rankings change frequently, as no industry can be disrupted as rapidly as the crypto space. The top 5 are: meteora, jito, jupitter, raydium, and solana. A discrepancy exists between expenses and valuation: Although application-based projects dominate expense generation, their market capitalization share has remained almost unchanged. Why is this? The market's valuation logic for application-based projects is similar to that for traditional enterprises: DeFi has a price-to-earnings ratio of about 17 times, while public chains have a valuation as high as 3900 times, which reflects additional narrative value (store of value, national-level infrastructure, etc.). What are the future trends for on-chain fees? Our baseline forecast shows that on-chain fees will exceed $32 billion in 2026, representing a year-on-year increase of 63%, primarily driven by the application layer. RWA, DePIN, wallets, and consumer applications are entering a period of accelerated development, while L1 fees will gradually stabilize as scaling technology continues to advance. Driven by favorable regulations, we believe this marks the beginning of the crypto industry's maturity phase: application scale, fee revenue, and value distribution will eventually advance in tandem. Full version: https://1kx.io/writing/2025-onchain-revenue-report
Share
PANews2025/10/31 16:43
IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge!

IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge!

The post IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 18:00 Discover why BlockDAG’s upcoming Awakening Testnet launch makes it the best crypto to buy today as Story (IP) price jumps to $11.75 and Hyperliquid hits new highs. Recent crypto market numbers show strength but also some limits. The Story (IP) price jump has been sharp, fueled by big buybacks and speculation, yet critics point out that revenue still lags far behind its valuation. The Hyperliquid (HYPE) price looks solid around the mid-$50s after a new all-time high, but questions remain about sustainability once the hype around USDH proposals cools down. So the obvious question is: why chase coins that are either stretched thin or at risk of retracing when you could back a network that’s already proving itself on the ground? That’s where BlockDAG comes in. While other chains are stuck dealing with validator congestion or outages, BlockDAG’s upcoming Awakening Testnet will be stress-testing its EVM-compatible smart chain with real miners before listing. For anyone looking for the best crypto coin to buy, the choice between waiting on fixes or joining live progress feels like an easy one. BlockDAG: Smart Chain Running Before Launch Ethereum continues to wrestle with gas congestion, and Solana is still known for network freezes, yet BlockDAG is already showing a different picture. Its upcoming Awakening Testnet, set to launch on September 25, isn’t just a demo; it’s a live rollout where the chain’s base protocols are being stress-tested with miners connected globally. EVM compatibility is active, account abstraction is built in, and tools like updated vesting contracts and Stratum integration are already functional. Instead of waiting for fixes like other networks, BlockDAG is proving its infrastructure in real time. What makes this even more important is that the technology is operational before the coin even hits exchanges. That…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:32