CalPERS plans to vote against Elon Musk’s $1 trillion Tesla pay deal, calling it too large and risky for shareholders.CalPERS plans to vote against Elon Musk’s $1 trillion Tesla pay deal, calling it too large and risky for shareholders.

California public pension fund votes against Musk’s $1 trillion Tesla pay deal

2025/10/30 19:51

California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest public pension fund in the United States, announced Thursday that it will vote against Elon Musk’s proposed $1 trillion, 10-year compensation package at Tesla Inc.

The fund currently holds approximately 5 million shares in Tesla, with an investment worth more than $2 billion in total.

CalPERS’ statement on the compensation package centered on the total size of the plan and Musk’s power consolidation from the deal. According to the pension fund, the pay deal, “more than pay packages for CEOs in comparable companies by many orders of magnitude,” poses governance risks for regular shareholders.

Tesla’s proposed plan ties Musk’s pay to aggressive performance targets for market capitalization, earnings, and innovation. Following that arrangement, Musk could own more than a quarter of the company, thereby gaining a significant voice on the board.

Musk could earn 12% of Tesla’s stock if the proposal is approved

The shareholder vote is scheduled for November 6, 2025, in Austin, Texas. CalPERS’ opposition is expected to influence other institutional investors, who may weigh in on the package’s governance implications.

In the weeks leading up to Tesla’s annual meeting in Austin, founder Elon Musk has been working hard to win support for the pay deal. He spent much of Tesla’s earnings call this month defending the pay package and criticizing the firms advising investors to reject it.

Under the proposed $1 trillion pay package, Musk would need to meet a series of performance targets over 10 years to receive the total amount — potentially giving him control of at least a quarter of Tesla. The plan would award Musk up to 12% of Tesla’s stock, valued at about $1.03 trillion, provided the automaker grows its market capitalization to $8.6 trillion over the next ten years.

It would also secure Musk’s influence over Tesla and its robotics plans, which he has been publicly demanding since early last year. The firm’s chairwoman, Robyn Denholm, had earlier defended the plan, arguing that it was meant to keep Musk driven and committed to Tesla’s goals.

She noted, “If he performs, if he hits the super ambitious milestones that are in the plan, then he gets equity, it’s 1% for each half a trillion dollars of market cap, plus operational milestones he has to hit in order to do that.” 

However, critics have argued that Musk doesn’t need extra incentives since he already owns the largest stake in Tesla, and that the deal could heighten dilution and governance risks.

Musk’s previous pay arrangements have not escaped controversy either. CalPERS CEO Marcie Frost said last year that the fund voted against his $56 billion proposal.

CalPERS had likewise rejected a 2018 compensation plan valued at over $50 billion. A Delaware judge ultimately voided that package, though Tesla is fighting the decision.

Some investors had considered replacing Musk

Earlier this year, Musk’s open confrontation with President Donald Trump had unsettled some Tesla investors and analysts, who feared it could distract him from the company and even triggered discussion on a possible leadership change.

In July, Musk declared his intention to found a third political party, the “America Party,” in response to his fallout with Trump over tax and spending legislation. However, Tesla’s board has advised investors to vote down a measure seeking a policy of political neutrality, which aimed to increase oversight of Musk’s political involvement.

Douglas Chia, president of Soundboard Governance, said it was clear Musk held considerable influence at Tesla, and he believed the board and investors would once again give him what he wanted.

For now, Tesla’s board has not yet indicated whether it will revise the plan in response to investor concerns. Analysts say the outcome of the vote could set a precedent for future executive compensation packages in tech and growth companies.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

U.S. Senate Finalizes Bipartisan Crypto Market Structure Bill

U.S. Senate Finalizes Bipartisan Crypto Market Structure Bill

The post U.S. Senate Finalizes Bipartisan Crypto Market Structure Bill appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Senate Agriculture Committee poised to release crypto market structure bill draft. Bipartisan negotiations resume after industry roundtable meeting last week. Impacts include formal CFTC oversight of digital commodities, boosting clarity. The U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee is poised to release a draft bill on crypto commodity market structure, marking key bipartisan efforts with unspecified release timing, as reported by Eleanor Terrett. This draft bill, enhancing regulatory clarity and oversight, is significant for market stability and investor confidence, impacting assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum under the CFTC’s expanded regulatory umbrella. Senate Committee’s Bipartisan Crypto Bill Nears Release Multiple sources have indicated the imminent release of a bipartisan draft bill by the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee. The proposed legislation aims to address commodity-related matters, specifically targeting digital assets’ market structure. Key figures involved include Senator John Boozman (R-Ark.), who expressed confidence in completing the framework within the year. This proposed bill seeks to enhance commodity oversight by formalizing the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s role in regulating digital commodities and spot markets. Such changes are expected to lead to increased regulatory certainty, fostering institutional interest and activity in cryptocurrency markets. “Substance is more important than timeline, but we intend to finalize a bipartisan draft ‘very, very soon,’” Cory Booker, Senator (D-N.J.) Bitcoin Holds Strong Amid Regulatory Bill Discussions Did you know? The proposed bill’s potential shift in regulation mirrors the impact seen with the CLARITY Act, historically stimulating market confidence without substantial immediate market shifts. Bitcoin (BTC) is currently trading at $108,803.29 with a circulating supply of 19,942,003, according to data from CoinMarketCap as of October 31, 2025. Despite a 1.93% dip in the last 24 hours, the cryptocurrency maintains a market cap of $2.17 trillion, representing 59.24% dominance in the market. Trading volumes have shown a 17.45% increase over the past…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/10/31 12:34