Bitcoin miner Core Scientific faced a setback on Thursday as it failed to secure shareholder approval for its proposed merger with AI infrastructure firm CoreWeave. The outcome of the preliminary vote will be officially disclosed in an upcoming SEC filing, expected on Friday. The proposed acquisition, valued at around $9 billion, has been a significant [...]Bitcoin miner Core Scientific faced a setback on Thursday as it failed to secure shareholder approval for its proposed merger with AI infrastructure firm CoreWeave. The outcome of the preliminary vote will be officially disclosed in an upcoming SEC filing, expected on Friday. The proposed acquisition, valued at around $9 billion, has been a significant [...]

Core Scientific Shareholders Block CoreWeave Acquisition Attempt

2025/10/31 04:51
Core Scientific Shareholders Block Coreweave Acquisition Attempt

Bitcoin miner Core Scientific faced a setback on Thursday as it failed to secure shareholder approval for its proposed merger with AI infrastructure firm CoreWeave. The outcome of the preliminary vote will be officially disclosed in an upcoming SEC filing, expected on Friday. The proposed acquisition, valued at around $9 billion, has been a significant focus in the crypto and AI sectors, reflecting the growing intersection between blockchain-based mining operations and artificial intelligence technology.

  • Core Scientific’s merger with CoreWeave was rejected by shareholders during Thursday’s vote.
  • The deal, valued at approximately $9 billion, remained pending approval; final results to be published soon.
  • Shares of Core Scientific declined over 5% following the vote outcome.
  • Despite the rejection, the proposed merger highlights ongoing industry consolidation between crypto mining and AI firms.
  • Major shareholders, such as Two Seas Capital, voiced opposition, citing concerns over undervaluation.

Core Scientific, a prominent player in Bitcoin mining, attempted to merge with AI infrastructure provider CoreWeave in July, offering shareholders 0.1235 shares of CoreWeave Class A stock for each share they held. The deal was part of a broader strategic move, signaling a tie-up between the crypto-mining industry and AI technology. However, the merger faced resistance from some shareholders during Thursday’s special meeting, ultimately resulting in its rejection. The final vote’s results will be released in a forthcoming SEC filing.

The deal had already stirred considerable attention among investors, with shares of Core Scientific falling by more than 5% immediately after the vote. Despite this setback, the merger agreement has been a topic of discussion for over a year, as both companies’ stock prices fluctuate significantly amid ongoing negotiations.

Investor sentiment has been divided, especially after CoreScientific rejected a previous buyout bid from CoreWeave evaluating the company at roughly $1 billion, or $5.75 per share, calling the offer significantly undervalued. Since re-engaging in negotiations, Core Scientific’s stock has more than tripled, increasing from around $6.20 in April to approximately $20.90 now. Meanwhile, CoreWeave’s shares have experienced declines, falling from about $163 to near $100 at the end of July, reflecting mixed feelings about the deal’s prospects.

CoreWeave sharesCoreWeave’s stock price trend from March to October. Source: TradingView

Opposition to the merger within CoreScientific remains strong, with notable shareholders like Two Seas Capital raising concerns over perceived undervaluation and potential economic risks for shareholders. The disagreement underscores ongoing tensions within the industry as firms weigh strategic moves amidst fluctuating crypto markets and evolving regulatory landscapes.

As the industry continues to explore new synergies between blockchain, Bitcoin, and AI, the outcome of this rejection may influence future corporate strategies and investor confidence in crypto-related mergers and acquisitions.

This article was originally published as Core Scientific Shareholders Block CoreWeave Acquisition Attempt on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

On-chain fee report for the first half of 2025: 1,124 protocols achieved profitability, with revenue exceeding $20 billion.

On-chain fee report for the first half of 2025: 1,124 protocols achieved profitability, with revenue exceeding $20 billion.

Author: 1kx network Compiled by: Tim, PANews 1kx has released its most comprehensive on-chain revenue report to date for the crypto market: the "1kx On-Chain Revenue Report (First Half of 2025)". The report compiles verified on-chain fee data from over 1,200 protocols, clearly depicting user payment paths, value flows, and the core factors driving growth. Why are on-chain fees so important? Because this is the most direct signal of genuine payment demand: On-chain ecosystem = open, global, and has investment value Off-chain ecosystem = restricted, mature Data comparison reveals development trends: on-chain application fees increased by 126% year-on-year, while off-chain fees only increased by 15%. How large is the market? In 2020, on-chain activity was still in the experimental stage, but by 2025 it will have developed into a real-time measurable $20 billion economy. Users are paying for hundreds of application scenarios: transactions, buying and selling, data storage, cross-application collaboration, and we have counted 1,124 protocols that have achieved on-chain profitability this year. How are the fees generated? DeFi remains a core pillar, contributing 63% of total fees, but the industry landscape is rapidly evolving: The wallet business (which surged 260% year-on-year) has transformed the user interface into a profit center. Consumer apps (200% growth) directly monetize user traffic. DePIN (which surged 400%) brings computing power and connectivity services onto the blockchain. Does the on-chain economy truly exist? Although the total cost did not exceed the 2021 peak, the ecological health is stronger than before: At that time, on-chain fees accounted for over 40% of ETH transactions; now, transaction costs have decreased by 86%. The number of profitable agreements increased eightfold. Token holders' dividends hit a record high What are the core driving factors? The asset price determines the on-chain fees denominated in USD, which is in line with expectations, but the following should be noted: Price fluctuations trigger seasonal cycles 21 years later, application costs and valuations show a strong causal relationship (increased costs drive up valuations). The influence of on-chain factors in specific tracks is significant. Who is the winner? The top 20 protocols account for 70% of the total fees, but the rankings change frequently, as no industry can be disrupted as rapidly as the crypto space. The top 5 are: meteora, jito, jupitter, raydium, and solana. A discrepancy exists between expenses and valuation: Although application-based projects dominate expense generation, their market capitalization share has remained almost unchanged. Why is this? The market's valuation logic for application-based projects is similar to that for traditional enterprises: DeFi has a price-to-earnings ratio of about 17 times, while public chains have a valuation as high as 3900 times, which reflects additional narrative value (store of value, national-level infrastructure, etc.). What are the future trends for on-chain fees? Our baseline forecast shows that on-chain fees will exceed $32 billion in 2026, representing a year-on-year increase of 63%, primarily driven by the application layer. RWA, DePIN, wallets, and consumer applications are entering a period of accelerated development, while L1 fees will gradually stabilize as scaling technology continues to advance. Driven by favorable regulations, we believe this marks the beginning of the crypto industry's maturity phase: application scale, fee revenue, and value distribution will eventually advance in tandem. Full version: https://1kx.io/writing/2025-onchain-revenue-report
Share
PANews2025/10/31 16:43