The post Listening To Music Linked To 39% Lower Dementia Risk, New Study Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new study showed that regularly listening to music, whether its’ from Sir Mix A Lot (pictured here) or someone else, is associated with lower likelihoods of cognitive decline and dementia. (Photo by Anthony Pidgeon/Redferns via Getty Images) Redferns via Getty Images Now, you have even more reason to keep playing “Baby’s Got Back” on loop well into your 70s, 80s and 90s. That’s because fellas (yeah,) fellas (yeah) and ladies (yeah), ladies (yeah) a new analysis recently published in the International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry found that those over 70 years of age who always listened to music had a 39% lower risk of having dementia than those who never, rarely or only sometimes did. And playas, meaning those who played a musical instrument, had a 35% lower risk of having dementia than those who didn’t. Both Listening To And Playing Music Were Associated With Lower Likelihoods of Dementia The analysis was conducted by a research team from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, (Emma Jaffa, Zimu Wu, Alice Owen, Aung Azw Zaw Phyo, Robyn L. Woods, Suzanne G. Orchard, Trevor T.-J. Chong and Joanne Ryan) and Rush University (Raj C. Shah) and Hennepin Health (Anne Murray) in the U.S. The team looked at data on 10,893 older Australians from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study and the ASPREE Longitudinal Study of Older Persons (ALSOP) sub‐study. While this study didn’t ask participants specifically about whether they listed to that Sir Mix-a-Lot song, it did inquire about their music listening and playing habits in general. Here are some other results that weren’t necessarily newly radical. Those with the music in them—meaning they were always listeining to music—had a 17% lower rate of cognitive impairment, along with better scores in overall cognition and the ability to recall everyday… The post Listening To Music Linked To 39% Lower Dementia Risk, New Study Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new study showed that regularly listening to music, whether its’ from Sir Mix A Lot (pictured here) or someone else, is associated with lower likelihoods of cognitive decline and dementia. (Photo by Anthony Pidgeon/Redferns via Getty Images) Redferns via Getty Images Now, you have even more reason to keep playing “Baby’s Got Back” on loop well into your 70s, 80s and 90s. That’s because fellas (yeah,) fellas (yeah) and ladies (yeah), ladies (yeah) a new analysis recently published in the International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry found that those over 70 years of age who always listened to music had a 39% lower risk of having dementia than those who never, rarely or only sometimes did. And playas, meaning those who played a musical instrument, had a 35% lower risk of having dementia than those who didn’t. Both Listening To And Playing Music Were Associated With Lower Likelihoods of Dementia The analysis was conducted by a research team from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, (Emma Jaffa, Zimu Wu, Alice Owen, Aung Azw Zaw Phyo, Robyn L. Woods, Suzanne G. Orchard, Trevor T.-J. Chong and Joanne Ryan) and Rush University (Raj C. Shah) and Hennepin Health (Anne Murray) in the U.S. The team looked at data on 10,893 older Australians from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study and the ASPREE Longitudinal Study of Older Persons (ALSOP) sub‐study. While this study didn’t ask participants specifically about whether they listed to that Sir Mix-a-Lot song, it did inquire about their music listening and playing habits in general. Here are some other results that weren’t necessarily newly radical. Those with the music in them—meaning they were always listeining to music—had a 17% lower rate of cognitive impairment, along with better scores in overall cognition and the ability to recall everyday…

Listening To Music Linked To 39% Lower Dementia Risk, New Study Says

2025/10/29 10:09

A new study showed that regularly listening to music, whether its’ from Sir Mix A Lot (pictured here) or someone else, is associated with lower likelihoods of cognitive decline and dementia. (Photo by Anthony Pidgeon/Redferns via Getty Images)

Redferns via Getty Images

Now, you have even more reason to keep playing “Baby’s Got Back” on loop well into your 70s, 80s and 90s. That’s because fellas (yeah,) fellas (yeah) and ladies (yeah), ladies (yeah) a new analysis recently published in the International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry found that those over 70 years of age who always listened to music had a 39% lower risk of having dementia than those who never, rarely or only sometimes did. And playas, meaning those who played a musical instrument, had a 35% lower risk of having dementia than those who didn’t.

Both Listening To And Playing Music Were Associated With Lower Likelihoods of Dementia

The analysis was conducted by a research team from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, (Emma Jaffa, Zimu Wu, Alice Owen, Aung Azw Zaw Phyo, Robyn L. Woods, Suzanne G. Orchard, Trevor T.-J. Chong and Joanne Ryan) and Rush University (Raj C. Shah) and Hennepin Health (Anne Murray) in the U.S. The team looked at data on 10,893 older Australians from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study and the ASPREE Longitudinal Study of Older Persons (ALSOP) sub‐study. While this study didn’t ask participants specifically about whether they listed to that Sir Mix-a-Lot song, it did inquire about their music listening and playing habits in general.

Here are some other results that weren’t necessarily newly radical. Those with the music in them—meaning they were always listeining to music—had a 17% lower rate of cognitive impairment, along with better scores in overall cognition and the ability to recall everyday events. And those who both listened to and played music regularly had 33% and 22% decreased likelihoods of dementia and cognitive impairment, respectively.

The Music And Dementia Study Did Have Limitations

South Korean rapper PSY (L) and surprise guest Rose of Blackpink perform her viral megahit “APT.” during PSY’s ‘Summer Swag 2025’ opening tour concert at the Incheon Asiad Main Stadium in Incheon on June 28, 2025. (Photo by ANTHONY WALLACE/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Of course, such a study can only show possible associations and cannot demonstrate cause-and-effect. For example, just because those who listen to Rosé’s “APT” regularly probably tend to be younger than those who listen to the Andrew Sisters’ “Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy” doesn’t mean that lyrics like “Kissy face, kissy face sent to your phone, but I’m tryna kiss your lips for real” will reverse your aging. It might be that those who regularly listen to or play music do so because they have less cognitive impairment. Or perhaps they are more likely to have other things such as regular social interactions and better healthcare that could have affected their health.

The analyses also didn’t look at how each individual may have progressed over time. This includes how both their music habits and their cognitive abilities may have changed with age. Knowing these things would offer better insight as to what have been happening.

Finally, these data are based in big part on self-report. An individual may not remember how often he or she has listened to music. For example, does music in the elevator or in movies count? What about someone listening to music nearby? Having impaired cognition can make this even more difficult to track accurately.

Music Can Stimulate The Brain And Perhaps That Can Help Protect Againts Dementia

Nonetheless, as alluded to earlier in the New Radicals allusion, these results shouldn’t be too surprising. Brain scans have revealed that hearing music can stimulate different parts of the brain. After all, how can you hear, “Come on, Barbie, let’s go party,” and not wonder where and how exactly Barbie is going to party?

At the same time, while scientists haven’t yet figured out to fully treat many different types of dementia, evidence does suggest that actively using the brain may prevent or slow cognitive decline. Your brain can be like many other parts of your body like your muscles. It can be a use it or lose situation.

And brain use and stimulation is not just all about that bass. Just because you don’t listen to or play music doesn’t mean that you don’t have other options to keep your brain active. There are many ways to challenge yourself mentally, ranging from playing word games to learning new skills to, gasp, actually listening and considering other point of views. Mixing with more diverse groups of people may help, too.

The results from this study do offer encouragement that you and your loved ones can do something about cognitive decline and dementia. I’ve already covered in Forbes studies that have suggested associations with physical activity, diet and other lifestyle factors. And recently I wrote about my conversation with Academy Award winning actress Julianne Moore, where she talked about the “Brain Health Matters” campaign that she’s involved in to get everyone to take more steps to reduce the risk of brain health issues like dementia from Alzheimer’s Disease and other causes.

One more thing. It would be interesting to see (or hear) whether the type of music matters when it comes to dementia risk. One might think that a greater variety of music could stimulate your brain in a greater variety of ways. After all, Pachelbel’s “Canon” may prompt different thoughts and feelings in you than Hanson’s “mmmBop.” So it may help mix-a-lot your song selections.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2025/10/28/listening-to-music-linked-to-39-lower-dementia-risk-new-study-says/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The End of Fragmentation: Towards a Coherent Ethereum

The End of Fragmentation: Towards a Coherent Ethereum

Author: Prince Compiled by: Block unicorn Ethereum's initial vision was a permissionless, infinitely open platform where anyone with an idea could participate. Its principle is simple: a world computer sharing a single global state view. Ethereum's value lies in the fact that anyone can build useful applications, and that all applications are interconnected. As Ethereum evolves, its scaling roadmap brings both new opportunities and challenges. New closed ecosystems are beginning to emerge. Entrepreneurs seek higher performance or practical ways to make their products stand out. For some developers, the simplest way to achieve this is to create their own blockchain ecosystem. This ecosystem expands in almost every possible direction: new blockchains are launched (horizontal growth), and aggregations are introduced to expand the underlying layers (vertical growth). Other teams choose to build their own dedicated execution and consensus layers (application-specific blockchains) to meet the needs of their projects. Each expansion, viewed individually, is a reasonable decision. But from a broader perspective, this continuous expansion is beginning to undermine the belief that Ethereum will one day become the "world computer." Today, the same assets exist on multiple platforms and in multiple forms. The same exchanges or lending markets appear on every chain. The permissionless nature remains, but the coordination mechanisms are beginning to disappear. As state, assets, liquidity, and applications become increasingly fragmented, what was once an infinite garden is starting to resemble a complex maze. The real cost of fragmentation Fragmentation has not only created technical obstacles, but it has also changed how developers feel when choosing to build applications. The products delivered by each team initially functioned as expected. However, with increasing fragmentation, these teams were forced to migrate identical applications to other chains in order to retain existing users. Each new deployment seemed like progress, but for most developers, it felt like starting from scratch. Liquidity gradually eroded, and users left with it. Ethereum continues to grow and thrive, but it has gradually lost its community cohesion. Although the ecosystem remains active and continues to grow, individual interests have begun to take precedence over coordination and connection. This boundless garden is beginning to show signs of overgrowth and neglect. No one did anything wrong. Everyone followed the incentive mechanism. Over time, all that remained was exhaustion. Abundance was brought without permission, yet within this abundance, the very foundation that once held everything together began to crumble. Return of coherence MegaETH represents Ethereum's first real opportunity to scale block space supply to meet demand within a single execution environment. Currently, the L2 block space market is congested. Most projects are vying for the same user base, offering largely similar block space. Throughput bottlenecks persist, and high activity on individual sequencers artificially inflates transaction costs. Despite significant technological advancements, only a handful of scaling solutions have truly improved the user and developer experience. MegaETH aims to change that. It is one of the closest attempts to realizing Ethereum's original vision—building a world computer. By providing an execution environment with latency below 10 milliseconds, gigabit gas caps, and ultra-low-cost transactions, the MegaETH team is striving to achieve the vision of a world computer. All data is processed on a single shared state (ignoring privacy concerns for now), and real-time execution should be a guiding light for our industry and the only way we can truly compete with Web 2.0. As a founder building on MegaETH, what impressed me most wasn't the speed or millisecond-level latency, but rather that after many years, all applications built on Ethereum can finally connect and stay in sync, and at a low cost with short wait times. When all contracts and transactions reside in the same state machine, complex coordination mechanisms become simple again. Developers no longer need to struggle with latency or spend time optimizing contracts to improve gas efficiency; users no longer need to worry about which "version" of network they are transacting on. This is what MegaETH means by "Big Sequencer Energy": Ethereum possesses a high-performance execution layer built specifically for real-time applications. For the first time in years, users can build applications within the Ethereum execution environment without worrying about their location. All users can once again share the same execution environment, enabling latency-sensitive applications such as high-frequency trading, on-chain order books, real-time lending, and fully on-chain multiplayer games—features currently impossible due to Ethereum's resource limitations. Enter: MegaMafia In the context of MegaETH, those who experienced fragmentation are beginning to rebuild. We all know what we lost when everything fell apart. Now, the system is finally able to stay in sync, and it feels like moving forward rather than sideways. Each team works on a different level: transactions, credit, infrastructure, gaming, and more. But their goal is the same: to make Ethereum a unified whole again. MegaETH provides that opportunity, and MegaMafia has given it shape. The focus now is no longer on deploying more of the same applications, but on rebuilding the infrastructure so that the parts that are already working well can finally work together. Avon's role in world computing Avon brought the same concept to the credit market. Of all DeFi categories, lending is most severely affected by fragmentation. Each protocol operates on different versions of the same concept. Each market has its own liquidity, rules, and risks. Anyone who's used these markets knows the feeling. You check interest rates on one app, then compare them on another, and still don't know which is more reliable. Liquidity stagnates because it can't flow between different protocols. Avon introduces a coordination layer instead of deploying another pool of funds. Its order book connects different strategies (independent markets), enabling them to respond to each other in real time. You can think of it as many pools of funds connected through a shared layer (i.e., the order book). When one changes, the others are aware of it. Over time, the lending market will once again function as a single, interconnected market. Liquidity will flow to where the most competitive conditions are available. Borrowers will obtain the most competitive interest rates possible. Coordination is not just about optimizing interest rates or controlling them. More importantly, it's about providing a unified perspective on lending during market fluctuations. Towards a coherent Ethereum Ethereum doesn't need another chain. It needs a central hub where people gather and maintain Ethereum. MegaETH provides the trading venue. MegaMafia will provide the trading power. Avon will provide the coordination layer, enabling funds to flow within the system. Ethereum has faced fragmentation issues for the past few years; we believe MegaETH will drive Ethereum toward realizing its vision of becoming a world computer and reaching an unprecedented scale. As Ethereum begins to regain its rhythm, MegaETH will ensure that builders can do this at a near-infinite scale.
Share
PANews2025/10/31 14:00