The post No, a quantum computer didn’t break SHA-256 or Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SHA-256 became a trending topic last night on X after another round of quantum fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) spread across Bitcoin social media. According to a viral post, financial analysts at Standard Chartered published a recommendation to sell bitcoin (BTC) and buy gold on “credible rumors a quantum computer has cracked SHA-256.” Neither of those things actually occurred. No quantum computer cracked SHA-256 this week, and Standard Chartered didn’t recommend selling BTC for gold. The author admitted the source of the supposed news: “Oh I made it up.” Laughing at gullible users on X, they commented on the post’s popularity, saying, “BTC community is really this stupid.” Emulating the side-by-side logo style of Bitcoin historian Pete Rizzo, the original post gained over 30,000 impressions, quote-tweets in their thousands, and hundreds of likes. Read more: The internet is laughing at El Salvador’s ‘quantum-safe’ bitcoin Another fake quantum attack on Bitcoin Bitcoin miners use SHA-256 to hash blocks of transactions and earn the right to claim coinbase rewards and add data to the ledger. If a quantum computer were ever able to crack SHA-256, it might be able to take over Bitcoin’s hashpower and censor or stall new transactions entering the blockchain. Fake news about BTC circulates on a daily basis on X. Protos has previously covered fake news about Saudi Aramco mining BTC, Luke Dashjr advocating for a BTC hard fork, the Dutch government creating a strategic bitcoin reserve, Apple buying BTC, California seizing idle bitcoin, California adopting bitcoin, Kamala Harris taxing unsold BTC, Amazon adding BTC as a payment method, and countless other social media claims that never occurred. Most forms of modern cryptography, including large internet and financial security services, also rely on SHA-256. If a quantum computer ever cracked this algorithm, trillions of dollars in the global… The post No, a quantum computer didn’t break SHA-256 or Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SHA-256 became a trending topic last night on X after another round of quantum fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) spread across Bitcoin social media. According to a viral post, financial analysts at Standard Chartered published a recommendation to sell bitcoin (BTC) and buy gold on “credible rumors a quantum computer has cracked SHA-256.” Neither of those things actually occurred. No quantum computer cracked SHA-256 this week, and Standard Chartered didn’t recommend selling BTC for gold. The author admitted the source of the supposed news: “Oh I made it up.” Laughing at gullible users on X, they commented on the post’s popularity, saying, “BTC community is really this stupid.” Emulating the side-by-side logo style of Bitcoin historian Pete Rizzo, the original post gained over 30,000 impressions, quote-tweets in their thousands, and hundreds of likes. Read more: The internet is laughing at El Salvador’s ‘quantum-safe’ bitcoin Another fake quantum attack on Bitcoin Bitcoin miners use SHA-256 to hash blocks of transactions and earn the right to claim coinbase rewards and add data to the ledger. If a quantum computer were ever able to crack SHA-256, it might be able to take over Bitcoin’s hashpower and censor or stall new transactions entering the blockchain. Fake news about BTC circulates on a daily basis on X. Protos has previously covered fake news about Saudi Aramco mining BTC, Luke Dashjr advocating for a BTC hard fork, the Dutch government creating a strategic bitcoin reserve, Apple buying BTC, California seizing idle bitcoin, California adopting bitcoin, Kamala Harris taxing unsold BTC, Amazon adding BTC as a payment method, and countless other social media claims that never occurred. Most forms of modern cryptography, including large internet and financial security services, also rely on SHA-256. If a quantum computer ever cracked this algorithm, trillions of dollars in the global…

No, a quantum computer didn’t break SHA-256 or Bitcoin

2025/10/24 19:31

SHA-256 became a trending topic last night on X after another round of quantum fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) spread across Bitcoin social media.

According to a viral post, financial analysts at Standard Chartered published a recommendation to sell bitcoin (BTC) and buy gold on “credible rumors a quantum computer has cracked SHA-256.”

Neither of those things actually occurred.

No quantum computer cracked SHA-256 this week, and Standard Chartered didn’t recommend selling BTC for gold.

The author admitted the source of the supposed news: “Oh I made it up.”

Laughing at gullible users on X, they commented on the post’s popularity, saying, “BTC community is really this stupid.”

Emulating the side-by-side logo style of Bitcoin historian Pete Rizzo, the original post gained over 30,000 impressions, quote-tweets in their thousands, and hundreds of likes.

Read more: The internet is laughing at El Salvador’s ‘quantum-safe’ bitcoin

Another fake quantum attack on Bitcoin

Bitcoin miners use SHA-256 to hash blocks of transactions and earn the right to claim coinbase rewards and add data to the ledger.

If a quantum computer were ever able to crack SHA-256, it might be able to take over Bitcoin’s hashpower and censor or stall new transactions entering the blockchain.

Fake news about BTC circulates on a daily basis on X.

Protos has previously covered fake news about Saudi Aramco mining BTC, Luke Dashjr advocating for a BTC hard fork, the Dutch government creating a strategic bitcoin reserve, Apple buying BTC, California seizing idle bitcoin, California adopting bitcoin, Kamala Harris taxing unsold BTC, Amazon adding BTC as a payment method, and countless other social media claims that never occurred.

Most forms of modern cryptography, including large internet and financial security services, also rely on SHA-256.

If a quantum computer ever cracked this algorithm, trillions of dollars in the global economy would be at risk — not just BTC.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

On-chain fee report for the first half of 2025: 1,124 protocols achieved profitability, with revenue exceeding $20 billion.

On-chain fee report for the first half of 2025: 1,124 protocols achieved profitability, with revenue exceeding $20 billion.

Author: 1kx network Compiled by: Tim, PANews 1kx has released its most comprehensive on-chain revenue report to date for the crypto market: the "1kx On-Chain Revenue Report (First Half of 2025)". The report compiles verified on-chain fee data from over 1,200 protocols, clearly depicting user payment paths, value flows, and the core factors driving growth. Why are on-chain fees so important? Because this is the most direct signal of genuine payment demand: On-chain ecosystem = open, global, and has investment value Off-chain ecosystem = restricted, mature Data comparison reveals development trends: on-chain application fees increased by 126% year-on-year, while off-chain fees only increased by 15%. How large is the market? In 2020, on-chain activity was still in the experimental stage, but by 2025 it will have developed into a real-time measurable $20 billion economy. Users are paying for hundreds of application scenarios: transactions, buying and selling, data storage, cross-application collaboration, and we have counted 1,124 protocols that have achieved on-chain profitability this year. How are the fees generated? DeFi remains a core pillar, contributing 63% of total fees, but the industry landscape is rapidly evolving: The wallet business (which surged 260% year-on-year) has transformed the user interface into a profit center. Consumer apps (200% growth) directly monetize user traffic. DePIN (which surged 400%) brings computing power and connectivity services onto the blockchain. Does the on-chain economy truly exist? Although the total cost did not exceed the 2021 peak, the ecological health is stronger than before: At that time, on-chain fees accounted for over 40% of ETH transactions; now, transaction costs have decreased by 86%. The number of profitable agreements increased eightfold. Token holders' dividends hit a record high What are the core driving factors? The asset price determines the on-chain fees denominated in USD, which is in line with expectations, but the following should be noted: Price fluctuations trigger seasonal cycles 21 years later, application costs and valuations show a strong causal relationship (increased costs drive up valuations). The influence of on-chain factors in specific tracks is significant. Who is the winner? The top 20 protocols account for 70% of the total fees, but the rankings change frequently, as no industry can be disrupted as rapidly as the crypto space. The top 5 are: meteora, jito, jupitter, raydium, and solana. A discrepancy exists between expenses and valuation: Although application-based projects dominate expense generation, their market capitalization share has remained almost unchanged. Why is this? The market's valuation logic for application-based projects is similar to that for traditional enterprises: DeFi has a price-to-earnings ratio of about 17 times, while public chains have a valuation as high as 3900 times, which reflects additional narrative value (store of value, national-level infrastructure, etc.). What are the future trends for on-chain fees? Our baseline forecast shows that on-chain fees will exceed $32 billion in 2026, representing a year-on-year increase of 63%, primarily driven by the application layer. RWA, DePIN, wallets, and consumer applications are entering a period of accelerated development, while L1 fees will gradually stabilize as scaling technology continues to advance. Driven by favorable regulations, we believe this marks the beginning of the crypto industry's maturity phase: application scale, fee revenue, and value distribution will eventually advance in tandem. Full version: https://1kx.io/writing/2025-onchain-revenue-report
Share
PANews2025/10/31 16:43