Oracle’s new leadership is standing in front of a $300 billion bet that could reshape the company’s future, or crush it. The dual CEOs, Mike Sicilia and Clay Magouyrk, are defending a massive AI push built on new data centers and an aggressive partnership with OpenAI, according to The Wall Street Journal. The pair says […]Oracle’s new leadership is standing in front of a $300 billion bet that could reshape the company’s future, or crush it. The dual CEOs, Mike Sicilia and Clay Magouyrk, are defending a massive AI push built on new data centers and an aggressive partnership with OpenAI, according to The Wall Street Journal. The pair says […]

Oracle ties OpenAI deal to data-center strategy

2025/10/16 01:05

Oracle’s new leadership is standing in front of a $300 billion bet that could reshape the company’s future, or crush it.

The dual CEOs, Mike Sicilia and Clay Magouyrk, are defending a massive AI push built on new data centers and an aggressive partnership with OpenAI, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The pair says this is about giving businesses real computing power, bundled software, and analytics that make artificial intelligence actually usable.

Sicilia, who led Oracle Industries before taking the top job last month, said the company is “really in a unique situation to deliver what we call applied AI,” explaining that this includes infrastructure, analytics, and enterprise applications.

Magouyrk, who previously ran Oracle’s cloud infrastructure arm, said the company’s new AI platform will tie all of that together. Their pitch comes as investors question whether this huge AI build-out is sustainable or just another bubble waiting to pop.

Oracle ties OpenAI deal to data-center strategy

Shares of Oracle jumped more than 40 percent last month after the company reported a surge of $317 billion in future contract revenue for the quarter ending August 31. Much of that came from its five-year, $300 billion deal with OpenAI, which executives insist will anchor the next phase of its cloud business.

But analysts are already uneasy. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s chief executive, has admitted the company won’t turn a profit until 2029, which makes Oracle’s dependence on that partnership look risky.

Moody’s warned last month that Oracle’s balance sheet could come under strain from the cost of its new AI data centers and its reliance on OpenAI to fill them. Earlier this month, Oracle stock dropped as much as 7.1 percent before bouncing back, following a report that margins on renting out Nvidia chips were razor-thin.

Still, both Sicilia and Magouyrk plan to defend the math when they meet investors at Thursday’s Investor Day, arguing that scaling will make the business profitable.

Magouyrk said, “Margins are the wrong way to look at the business. I understand the economics of each marginal unit and how this works out as it scales, and that actually ends up being a very profitable business.”

Balaji Abbabatulla, an analyst at Gartner, said Oracle’s playbook is to sell entire ecosystems of AI tools rather than single products. “They’re not going to be able to show clear returns if they don’t go for those large and multibillion-dollar deals,” he said.

That approach means combining AI infrastructure with databases, enterprise-resource-planning tools, and HR software so corporate clients can buy it all from one vendor.

Margins, inference, and debt weigh on investor faith

Another piece of Oracle’s plan is AI inference; the process of running models after they’re trained. Most infrastructure spending today goes into training, but inference is where customers actually use models and generate results.

Magouyrk said Oracle can let clients “do their inferencing right alongside their data with the best models.” He claimed usage could increase a thousandfold once customers adopt its new AI Data Platform.

Shawnna DelHierro, chief information officer at SoundHound AI, said her company already uses Oracle’s cloud to train and run models, handling over one billion queries per month. SoundHound also uses Oracle’s back-office software and picked the firm because it offered “a true partner” and “zero latency,” she said.

Still, many enterprises complain they haven’t seen quick returns from AI even as they pour money into it. Oracle has added more debt to stay ahead, issuing $18 billion in bonds in late September to fund its AI data-center build-out, including the massive Stargate project with OpenAI.

Magouyrk pushed back on fears about debt, saying that if you combine Oracle’s new contracts, revenue projections, and cash flow, the picture looks “much rosier.” He added that Oracle isn’t betting everything on one client. “Pretty much all of the big model providers use our cloud in one form or another,” he said. “You can’t get more than 100 percent of the Pokémon.”

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

On-chain fee report for the first half of 2025: 1,124 protocols achieved profitability, with revenue exceeding $20 billion.

On-chain fee report for the first half of 2025: 1,124 protocols achieved profitability, with revenue exceeding $20 billion.

Author: 1kx network Compiled by: Tim, PANews 1kx has released its most comprehensive on-chain revenue report to date for the crypto market: the "1kx On-Chain Revenue Report (First Half of 2025)". The report compiles verified on-chain fee data from over 1,200 protocols, clearly depicting user payment paths, value flows, and the core factors driving growth. Why are on-chain fees so important? Because this is the most direct signal of genuine payment demand: On-chain ecosystem = open, global, and has investment value Off-chain ecosystem = restricted, mature Data comparison reveals development trends: on-chain application fees increased by 126% year-on-year, while off-chain fees only increased by 15%. How large is the market? In 2020, on-chain activity was still in the experimental stage, but by 2025 it will have developed into a real-time measurable $20 billion economy. Users are paying for hundreds of application scenarios: transactions, buying and selling, data storage, cross-application collaboration, and we have counted 1,124 protocols that have achieved on-chain profitability this year. How are the fees generated? DeFi remains a core pillar, contributing 63% of total fees, but the industry landscape is rapidly evolving: The wallet business (which surged 260% year-on-year) has transformed the user interface into a profit center. Consumer apps (200% growth) directly monetize user traffic. DePIN (which surged 400%) brings computing power and connectivity services onto the blockchain. Does the on-chain economy truly exist? Although the total cost did not exceed the 2021 peak, the ecological health is stronger than before: At that time, on-chain fees accounted for over 40% of ETH transactions; now, transaction costs have decreased by 86%. The number of profitable agreements increased eightfold. Token holders' dividends hit a record high What are the core driving factors? The asset price determines the on-chain fees denominated in USD, which is in line with expectations, but the following should be noted: Price fluctuations trigger seasonal cycles 21 years later, application costs and valuations show a strong causal relationship (increased costs drive up valuations). The influence of on-chain factors in specific tracks is significant. Who is the winner? The top 20 protocols account for 70% of the total fees, but the rankings change frequently, as no industry can be disrupted as rapidly as the crypto space. The top 5 are: meteora, jito, jupitter, raydium, and solana. A discrepancy exists between expenses and valuation: Although application-based projects dominate expense generation, their market capitalization share has remained almost unchanged. Why is this? The market's valuation logic for application-based projects is similar to that for traditional enterprises: DeFi has a price-to-earnings ratio of about 17 times, while public chains have a valuation as high as 3900 times, which reflects additional narrative value (store of value, national-level infrastructure, etc.). What are the future trends for on-chain fees? Our baseline forecast shows that on-chain fees will exceed $32 billion in 2026, representing a year-on-year increase of 63%, primarily driven by the application layer. RWA, DePIN, wallets, and consumer applications are entering a period of accelerated development, while L1 fees will gradually stabilize as scaling technology continues to advance. Driven by favorable regulations, we believe this marks the beginning of the crypto industry's maturity phase: application scale, fee revenue, and value distribution will eventually advance in tandem. Full version: https://1kx.io/writing/2025-onchain-revenue-report
Share
PANews2025/10/31 16:43