The cofounder of leading Solana-based memecoin launchpad, Pump.fun, has declared it has already overtaken Rumble in the live-streaming market, though independent data to back that claim remains scarce. Alon Cohen said on X that the platform has “already flipped Rumble in terms of average number of concurrent live streams,” adding that it is “currently inching […]The cofounder of leading Solana-based memecoin launchpad, Pump.fun, has declared it has already overtaken Rumble in the live-streaming market, though independent data to back that claim remains scarce. Alon Cohen said on X that the platform has “already flipped Rumble in terms of average number of concurrent live streams,” adding that it is “currently inching […]

Pump.fun makes comeback after 2024 controversy

2025/09/15 04:26

The cofounder of leading Solana-based memecoin launchpad, Pump.fun, has declared it has already overtaken Rumble in the live-streaming market, though independent data to back that claim remains scarce.

Alon Cohen said on X that the platform has “already flipped Rumble in terms of average number of concurrent live streams,” adding that it is “currently inching at ~1% of Twitch’s market share and ~10% of Kick’s.”

He concluded with a warning to rivals: “We’re nibbling on their lunch and COMING FOR MORE.”

Pump.fun makes comeback after 2024 controversy

Pump.fun’s streaming feature was first introduced in 2024 as a way to integrate live broadcasting with token launches. However, in late 2024, the company suspended live-streaming indefinitely after reports of abusive and dangerous live sessions, including users engaging in self-harm stunts to promote token launches.

Earlier this year, the feature was reintroduced for a limited pool of about 5% of users, with stricter moderation and safety rules. Shortly after, it was made available to all users.

Since coming back from the dead, it has brought more life to the platform, with the team pushing for increased adoption, and it seems to have taken it a notch further this September.

Alon leads challenge to live-streaming model

The company has been pitching the model as a radical alternative to platforms like Twitch, Kick, and YouTube. In a follow-up post on X, Alon listed the platform’s key advantages, one of which, according to him, is instant creator fees, adding that creators will make times 100 what they’ll earn elsewhere.

Another advantage is instant viewership with a community that’s incentivized to support creators. Others are free clipping on X and 24/7 support from the team.

The pitch is targeted at younger creators frustrated by what Alon described in another post as “lack of monetization or censorship” on mainstream platforms. “Millions of the most influential people amongst Gen Z are begging for a better system,” he said.

Although it has been hard to verify Pump.fun’s claims, according to data from StreamCharts, Rumble has averaged about 251 concurrent live channels and over 56,000 concurrent viewers over the past 30 days.

For Pump.fun to have “flipped” Rumble, it would need to surpass that threshold in active live streams. While there’s data that shows the activity on other streaming platforms such as Rumble, Twitch, YouTube, Kick, and many more, there’s no data to back Alon’s claim, which came not long after Pump.fun’s native token briefly crossed $3 billion in its market capitalization.

Skepticism over the token model

The platform’s rapid growth has caught the attention of industry observers, but not all are convinced of its sustainability. Bob Bodily, founder of Odin.fun, a memecoin launchpad in the Bitcoin ecosystem, voiced concern that Pump.fun’s token-driven system could ultimately turn creators against it.

“Streaming on Pump.fun gives you an opportunity to make money, especially right now in the early days,” Bodily posted on X. “But why does a streamer want a token hanging over their heads? As soon as the volume stops (which it inevitably will), the music stops, and everyone hates them for their low-performing token.”

He added that the model incentivizes volatility rather than stable earnings: “Volume-based creator rewards incentivize pump and dumps. As a creator, you want volatility in your token because that drives volume and rewards. So I’m not a huge fan of the model.”

While Pump.fun promises recurring revenue and instant fees, critics fear the incentives encourage short-term extraction rather than sustainable communities.

The live-streaming wars are increasingly shaped by questions of monetization. Pump.fun is betting that creators will embrace speculative token models as a shortcut to earnings. Its critics argue that those same mechanisms could drive them away.

KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The End of Fragmentation: Towards a Coherent Ethereum

The End of Fragmentation: Towards a Coherent Ethereum

Author: Prince Compiled by: Block unicorn Ethereum's initial vision was a permissionless, infinitely open platform where anyone with an idea could participate. Its principle is simple: a world computer sharing a single global state view. Ethereum's value lies in the fact that anyone can build useful applications, and that all applications are interconnected. As Ethereum evolves, its scaling roadmap brings both new opportunities and challenges. New closed ecosystems are beginning to emerge. Entrepreneurs seek higher performance or practical ways to make their products stand out. For some developers, the simplest way to achieve this is to create their own blockchain ecosystem. This ecosystem expands in almost every possible direction: new blockchains are launched (horizontal growth), and aggregations are introduced to expand the underlying layers (vertical growth). Other teams choose to build their own dedicated execution and consensus layers (application-specific blockchains) to meet the needs of their projects. Each expansion, viewed individually, is a reasonable decision. But from a broader perspective, this continuous expansion is beginning to undermine the belief that Ethereum will one day become the "world computer." Today, the same assets exist on multiple platforms and in multiple forms. The same exchanges or lending markets appear on every chain. The permissionless nature remains, but the coordination mechanisms are beginning to disappear. As state, assets, liquidity, and applications become increasingly fragmented, what was once an infinite garden is starting to resemble a complex maze. The real cost of fragmentation Fragmentation has not only created technical obstacles, but it has also changed how developers feel when choosing to build applications. The products delivered by each team initially functioned as expected. However, with increasing fragmentation, these teams were forced to migrate identical applications to other chains in order to retain existing users. Each new deployment seemed like progress, but for most developers, it felt like starting from scratch. Liquidity gradually eroded, and users left with it. Ethereum continues to grow and thrive, but it has gradually lost its community cohesion. Although the ecosystem remains active and continues to grow, individual interests have begun to take precedence over coordination and connection. This boundless garden is beginning to show signs of overgrowth and neglect. No one did anything wrong. Everyone followed the incentive mechanism. Over time, all that remained was exhaustion. Abundance was brought without permission, yet within this abundance, the very foundation that once held everything together began to crumble. Return of coherence MegaETH represents Ethereum's first real opportunity to scale block space supply to meet demand within a single execution environment. Currently, the L2 block space market is congested. Most projects are vying for the same user base, offering largely similar block space. Throughput bottlenecks persist, and high activity on individual sequencers artificially inflates transaction costs. Despite significant technological advancements, only a handful of scaling solutions have truly improved the user and developer experience. MegaETH aims to change that. It is one of the closest attempts to realizing Ethereum's original vision—building a world computer. By providing an execution environment with latency below 10 milliseconds, gigabit gas caps, and ultra-low-cost transactions, the MegaETH team is striving to achieve the vision of a world computer. All data is processed on a single shared state (ignoring privacy concerns for now), and real-time execution should be a guiding light for our industry and the only way we can truly compete with Web 2.0. As a founder building on MegaETH, what impressed me most wasn't the speed or millisecond-level latency, but rather that after many years, all applications built on Ethereum can finally connect and stay in sync, and at a low cost with short wait times. When all contracts and transactions reside in the same state machine, complex coordination mechanisms become simple again. Developers no longer need to struggle with latency or spend time optimizing contracts to improve gas efficiency; users no longer need to worry about which "version" of network they are transacting on. This is what MegaETH means by "Big Sequencer Energy": Ethereum possesses a high-performance execution layer built specifically for real-time applications. For the first time in years, users can build applications within the Ethereum execution environment without worrying about their location. All users can once again share the same execution environment, enabling latency-sensitive applications such as high-frequency trading, on-chain order books, real-time lending, and fully on-chain multiplayer games—features currently impossible due to Ethereum's resource limitations. Enter: MegaMafia In the context of MegaETH, those who experienced fragmentation are beginning to rebuild. We all know what we lost when everything fell apart. Now, the system is finally able to stay in sync, and it feels like moving forward rather than sideways. Each team works on a different level: transactions, credit, infrastructure, gaming, and more. But their goal is the same: to make Ethereum a unified whole again. MegaETH provides that opportunity, and MegaMafia has given it shape. The focus now is no longer on deploying more of the same applications, but on rebuilding the infrastructure so that the parts that are already working well can finally work together. Avon's role in world computing Avon brought the same concept to the credit market. Of all DeFi categories, lending is most severely affected by fragmentation. Each protocol operates on different versions of the same concept. Each market has its own liquidity, rules, and risks. Anyone who's used these markets knows the feeling. You check interest rates on one app, then compare them on another, and still don't know which is more reliable. Liquidity stagnates because it can't flow between different protocols. Avon introduces a coordination layer instead of deploying another pool of funds. Its order book connects different strategies (independent markets), enabling them to respond to each other in real time. You can think of it as many pools of funds connected through a shared layer (i.e., the order book). When one changes, the others are aware of it. Over time, the lending market will once again function as a single, interconnected market. Liquidity will flow to where the most competitive conditions are available. Borrowers will obtain the most competitive interest rates possible. Coordination is not just about optimizing interest rates or controlling them. More importantly, it's about providing a unified perspective on lending during market fluctuations. Towards a coherent Ethereum Ethereum doesn't need another chain. It needs a central hub where people gather and maintain Ethereum. MegaETH provides the trading venue. MegaMafia will provide the trading power. Avon will provide the coordination layer, enabling funds to flow within the system. Ethereum has faced fragmentation issues for the past few years; we believe MegaETH will drive Ethereum toward realizing its vision of becoming a world computer and reaching an unprecedented scale. As Ethereum begins to regain its rhythm, MegaETH will ensure that builders can do this at a near-infinite scale.
Share
PANews2025/10/31 14:00