The post ‘The Witcher’ Season 4 Fails To Debut At #1 On Netflix Amidst Awful Scores appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Once upon a time, The Witcher seemed like it was going to be Netflix’s answer to Game of Thrones, a well-cast, well-formed adaptation of the books (and sometimes games) with a powerhouse trio playing Geralt, Yennefer and Ciri. Henry Cavill’s Geralt anchored the show, but now in season 4, after his departure, review scores have crashed, and interest in the show has visibly waned. I’ll get to the scores in a minute, but the most shocking thing to me is that at release here, a show the size of The Witcher did not debut at #1 on Netflix’s Top 10 list, nor even #2, coming in at #3 behind romantic comedy Nobody Wants This, which debuted over a week ago, and the reality series Selling Sunset, back for season 9. That is bad. What’s going on here? A number of things: Season 4 isn’t great. Critics have rated it lower than all other Witcher seasons with a 56% on Rotten Tomatoes, down from the 68%, 95% and 79% of seasons 1-3, respectively. Then we have the “review bombing” of audience scores, where season 4 has a dismal 18%, but a whole lot of that is a very real representation of how much previous fans of the series now hate the recasting of Cavill as Geralt, now played by Liam Hemsworth. Though to be fair, season 3, which still did have Cavill, got a 20% audience score, mostly from fans upset about departures from the source material. The gap between seasons was too long. It’s been two years and four months since season 3 premiered, pushing its luck even among generally long gaps between seasons of shows in the streaming era. If you were already questioning whether the show was going to be any good after a recast and not-great previous… The post ‘The Witcher’ Season 4 Fails To Debut At #1 On Netflix Amidst Awful Scores appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Once upon a time, The Witcher seemed like it was going to be Netflix’s answer to Game of Thrones, a well-cast, well-formed adaptation of the books (and sometimes games) with a powerhouse trio playing Geralt, Yennefer and Ciri. Henry Cavill’s Geralt anchored the show, but now in season 4, after his departure, review scores have crashed, and interest in the show has visibly waned. I’ll get to the scores in a minute, but the most shocking thing to me is that at release here, a show the size of The Witcher did not debut at #1 on Netflix’s Top 10 list, nor even #2, coming in at #3 behind romantic comedy Nobody Wants This, which debuted over a week ago, and the reality series Selling Sunset, back for season 9. That is bad. What’s going on here? A number of things: Season 4 isn’t great. Critics have rated it lower than all other Witcher seasons with a 56% on Rotten Tomatoes, down from the 68%, 95% and 79% of seasons 1-3, respectively. Then we have the “review bombing” of audience scores, where season 4 has a dismal 18%, but a whole lot of that is a very real representation of how much previous fans of the series now hate the recasting of Cavill as Geralt, now played by Liam Hemsworth. Though to be fair, season 3, which still did have Cavill, got a 20% audience score, mostly from fans upset about departures from the source material. The gap between seasons was too long. It’s been two years and four months since season 3 premiered, pushing its luck even among generally long gaps between seasons of shows in the streaming era. If you were already questioning whether the show was going to be any good after a recast and not-great previous…

‘The Witcher’ Season 4 Fails To Debut At #1 On Netflix Amidst Awful Scores

2025/10/31 22:09

Once upon a time, The Witcher seemed like it was going to be Netflix’s answer to Game of Thrones, a well-cast, well-formed adaptation of the books (and sometimes games) with a powerhouse trio playing Geralt, Yennefer and Ciri. Henry Cavill’s Geralt anchored the show, but now in season 4, after his departure, review scores have crashed, and interest in the show has visibly waned.

I’ll get to the scores in a minute, but the most shocking thing to me is that at release here, a show the size of The Witcher did not debut at #1 on Netflix’s Top 10 list, nor even #2, coming in at #3 behind romantic comedy Nobody Wants This, which debuted over a week ago, and the reality series Selling Sunset, back for season 9. That is bad.

What’s going on here? A number of things:

  • Season 4 isn’t great. Critics have rated it lower than all other Witcher seasons with a 56% on Rotten Tomatoes, down from the 68%, 95% and 79% of seasons 1-3, respectively.
  • Then we have the “review bombing” of audience scores, where season 4 has a dismal 18%, but a whole lot of that is a very real representation of how much previous fans of the series now hate the recasting of Cavill as Geralt, now played by Liam Hemsworth. Though to be fair, season 3, which still did have Cavill, got a 20% audience score, mostly from fans upset about departures from the source material.
  • The gap between seasons was too long. It’s been two years and four months since season 3 premiered, pushing its luck even among generally long gaps between seasons of shows in the streaming era. If you were already questioning whether the show was going to be any good after a recast and not-great previous seasons, you may not bother showing up at all. And this is a significant factor in The Witcher’s low placement on the list here.

A year ago, The Witcher was already renewed for season 5, which will finish the saga with Hemsworth’s Geralt. Netflix is pot-committed now, as if you’ve gone this deep, you can’t really just end at 80%, even if quality and interest are fading.

This show is just such a mess of missed opportunities. Cavill was perfectly cast as Geralt, but he could not save the series by himself. Book departures certainly didn’t help, but even if you haven’t read the books, it’s just…not a terribly good fantasy series. It’s miles away from those early seasons of Game of Thrones, and the best you can say is “well, at least it’s better than the Amazon Lord of the Rings show.” Sometimes, anyway.

I’d say this spells disaster for the show, but again, season 5 is coming, barring any sort of emergency brake pulled by Netflix. I won’t rule it out, but Netflix essentially has to see this through now.

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.

Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2025/10/31/the-witcher-season-4-fails-to-debut-at-1-on-netflix-amidst-awful-scores/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Wormhole Unveils W Token 2.0 with Enhanced Tokenomics

Wormhole Unveils W Token 2.0 with Enhanced Tokenomics

The post Wormhole Unveils W Token 2.0 with Enhanced Tokenomics appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Joerg Hiller Sep 17, 2025 13:57 Wormhole introduces W Token 2.0, featuring upgraded tokenomics, a strategic Wormhole Reserve, and a 4% base yield, aiming to optimize ecosystem growth and align incentives. Wormhole has announced a significant upgrade to its native token, unveiling the W Token 2.0. This upgrade introduces new tokenomics including the establishment of a Wormhole Reserve, a 4% base yield, and an optimized unlock schedule, marking a pivotal development in the ecosystem, according to Wormhole. The W Token Evolution Launched in October 2020, Wormhole’s W token has been central to the platform’s mission of creating a connected internet economy. The latest upgrade aims to enhance the token’s utility across more than 40 blockchains. With a capped supply of 10 billion, the W token supports governance, staking, and ecosystem growth, aligning incentives for network security and development. Introducing the Wormhole Reserve The Wormhole Reserve will accumulate value from both onchain and offchain activities, supporting the ecosystem’s expansion. As Wormhole adoption grows, the token will capture value through network expansions and ecosystem applications, ensuring that growth is directly reflected in the token’s value. 4% Base Yield and Governance Rewards Wormhole 2.0 introduces a 4% base yield for W holders who actively participate in governance. The yield, derived from existing token supplies and protocol revenues, is designed to incentivize active participation without inflating the token supply. Optimized Unlock Schedule Updating its token release schedule, Wormhole replaces annual cliffs with bi-weekly unlocks, starting October 3, 2025. This change aims to reduce market pressure and provide a more stable environment for investors and contributors. The bi-weekly schedule will span over 4.5 years, affecting categories such as Guardian Nodes and Community & Launch. Wormhole’s Future Vision With these upgrades, Wormhole aims to expand its role as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 15:48
Best Crypto Presale to Buy Now: Noomez ($NNZ) Launches

Best Crypto Presale to Buy Now: Noomez ($NNZ) Launches

The post Best Crypto Presale to Buy Now: Noomez ($NNZ) Launches appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market is increasingly dominated by Bitcoin, which currently holds around 58 % of total market capitalization. Amid that backdrop, a new presale token, Noomez ($NNZ), has quietly launched and drawn early attention. In just two days of its opening stage, Noomez has already raised over $4,500 toward a $127,000 target, highlighting early momentum as the fare-offer for one of the best crypto presales to buy now enters the market. A Presale That’s Actually Transparent The Noomez presale isn’t hidden behind vague promises. Its Genesis Horn dashboard displays every transaction in real-time, including funds raised, holder count, and live burn tracking.  The token price currently sits at $0.00001, marking the lowest possible entry point before automatic price increases at each stage. Unlike typical meme coins that rely solely on hype, Noomez introduces visible accountability, and that’s what’s drawing serious investors early. Built Around Fairness and Deflation Noomez integrates fairness directly into its design. Each of the 28 stages lasts a maximum of seven days or closes early if sold out. Unsold tokens are permanently burned. Key fairness systems include: Anti-Bot Protection: Each wallet gets only one ticket per stage, with a $20 minimum buy-in. Equal Access: Both small and large investors participate under the same conditions. Deflationary Model: Tokens burned at every unsold stage permanently lower the supply. Why Investors Call It “Anti-Rug” Noomez takes the opposite approach, prioritizing locked liquidity and transparent mechanisms to maintain investor trust. At launch, 15% of the total supply will be locked into liquidity through a trusted third-party platform, fully verifiable by the community. On top of that, team tokens are locked and vested for 6-12 months, meaning developers cannot dump their holdings right after launch. The combination of locked liquidity and vested team tokens has made Noomez one of the few new…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/02 04:07