The post India Considers Mandatory Satellite Tracking on Smartphones as Apple and Google Push Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. India’s telecom industry has proposed mandatory satellite location tracking on all smartphones using A-GPS technology, which cannot be disabled by users, to enhance precise surveillance capabilities for government agencies. COAI’s Proposal: Representing major carriers like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel, the Cellular Operators Association of India seeks A-GPS integration for location accuracy within one meter. Current Limitations: Cellular tower data only provides rough estimates, hindering effective investigations. Tech Rejections: Apple, Google, and Samsung oppose the measure, citing privacy risks and lack of global precedent, with over 735 million smartphones affected in India as of mid-2025. India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones raises privacy alarms as telecom firms push for mandatory A-GPS. Discover tech giants’ opposition and surveillance implications. Stay informed on global policy shifts. What is India’s Proposal for Mandatory Satellite Location Tracking on Smartphones? India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones involves requiring all devices to enable A-GPS technology permanently, combining satellite signals and cellular data for precise user location without user opt-out options. This initiative, backed by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), aims to improve government access to accurate location data during legal investigations. Telecom leaders like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel support it to overcome the limitations of current cellular tower-based tracking, which offers only approximate positions spanning several meters. Why Have Apple and Google Rejected India’s Telecom Industry Proposal? The proposal has met strong resistance from major smartphone manufacturers. Apple, Google, and Samsung, through their representative body the India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), sent a confidential letter to Indian authorities in July, labeling it as unprecedented regulatory overreach. They highlighted that A-GPS is not designed or deployed for location surveillance purposes and warned of severe legal, privacy, and national security risks. For instance, the user base includes sensitive professionals such as military… The post India Considers Mandatory Satellite Tracking on Smartphones as Apple and Google Push Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. India’s telecom industry has proposed mandatory satellite location tracking on all smartphones using A-GPS technology, which cannot be disabled by users, to enhance precise surveillance capabilities for government agencies. COAI’s Proposal: Representing major carriers like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel, the Cellular Operators Association of India seeks A-GPS integration for location accuracy within one meter. Current Limitations: Cellular tower data only provides rough estimates, hindering effective investigations. Tech Rejections: Apple, Google, and Samsung oppose the measure, citing privacy risks and lack of global precedent, with over 735 million smartphones affected in India as of mid-2025. India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones raises privacy alarms as telecom firms push for mandatory A-GPS. Discover tech giants’ opposition and surveillance implications. Stay informed on global policy shifts. What is India’s Proposal for Mandatory Satellite Location Tracking on Smartphones? India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones involves requiring all devices to enable A-GPS technology permanently, combining satellite signals and cellular data for precise user location without user opt-out options. This initiative, backed by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), aims to improve government access to accurate location data during legal investigations. Telecom leaders like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel support it to overcome the limitations of current cellular tower-based tracking, which offers only approximate positions spanning several meters. Why Have Apple and Google Rejected India’s Telecom Industry Proposal? The proposal has met strong resistance from major smartphone manufacturers. Apple, Google, and Samsung, through their representative body the India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), sent a confidential letter to Indian authorities in July, labeling it as unprecedented regulatory overreach. They highlighted that A-GPS is not designed or deployed for location surveillance purposes and warned of severe legal, privacy, and national security risks. For instance, the user base includes sensitive professionals such as military…

India Considers Mandatory Satellite Tracking on Smartphones as Apple and Google Push Back

2025/12/06 23:02
  • COAI’s Proposal: Representing major carriers like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel, the Cellular Operators Association of India seeks A-GPS integration for location accuracy within one meter.

  • Current Limitations: Cellular tower data only provides rough estimates, hindering effective investigations.

  • Tech Rejections: Apple, Google, and Samsung oppose the measure, citing privacy risks and lack of global precedent, with over 735 million smartphones affected in India as of mid-2025.

India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones raises privacy alarms as telecom firms push for mandatory A-GPS. Discover tech giants’ opposition and surveillance implications. Stay informed on global policy shifts.

What is India’s Proposal for Mandatory Satellite Location Tracking on Smartphones?

India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones involves requiring all devices to enable A-GPS technology permanently, combining satellite signals and cellular data for precise user location without user opt-out options. This initiative, backed by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), aims to improve government access to accurate location data during legal investigations. Telecom leaders like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel support it to overcome the limitations of current cellular tower-based tracking, which offers only approximate positions spanning several meters.

Why Have Apple and Google Rejected India’s Telecom Industry Proposal?

The proposal has met strong resistance from major smartphone manufacturers. Apple, Google, and Samsung, through their representative body the India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), sent a confidential letter to Indian authorities in July, labeling it as unprecedented regulatory overreach. They highlighted that A-GPS is not designed or deployed for location surveillance purposes and warned of severe legal, privacy, and national security risks. For instance, the user base includes sensitive professionals such as military personnel, judges, and journalists, whose security could be compromised by constant tracking. Digital forensics expert Junade Ali from Britain’s Institution of Engineering and Technology described the measure as turning phones into dedicated surveillance devices. Similarly, security researcher Cooper Quintin from the Electronic Frontier Foundation called it horrifying, noting no similar global proposals exist. This opposition echoes a prior incident where the government retracted a mandate for pre-installed state-run cyber safety apps due to privacy concerns raised by activists and tech firms.

India’s telecom sector, driven by the need for better investigative tools, argues that existing systems fall short. Government agencies under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration have long expressed frustration over imprecise location data from cellular towers. Moreover, smartphone notifications alerting users to carrier location requests undermine operations by tipping off potential targets. The COAI urges disabling these alerts entirely to maintain surveillance integrity. In response, ICEA defended the notifications as essential for user transparency and control. A scheduled meeting between the home ministry and industry executives was postponed, leaving the policy’s fate undecided by the IT and home ministries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Potential Privacy Implications of India’s Satellite Location Tracking Proposal?

Implementing mandatory A-GPS tracking without user disable options could enable constant government surveillance, raising significant privacy concerns. Experts warn it might expose sensitive user data, affecting millions in India’s 735 million smartphone market, where Android dominates over 95%. This could set a precedent for expanded monitoring worldwide, conflicting with global privacy standards.

How Does A-GPS Technology Work in the Context of India’s Telecom Proposal?

A-GPS enhances location accuracy by integrating satellite signals with cellular network data, achieving precision up to one meter, far superior to traditional tower triangulation. In India’s proposal, it would operate continuously on smartphones, providing authorities with real-time, detailed user positions during investigations, without relying solely on less accurate cellular estimates.

Key Takeaways

  • Permanent Tracking Mandate: The COAI proposal demands A-GPS activation on all smartphones, eliminating user control to aid precise law enforcement tracking.
  • Industry Backlash: Tech giants like Apple and Google argue it poses unprecedented privacy threats, impacting high-security users and lacking international support.
  • Market Impact: With 735 million devices in India by mid-2025, approval could influence global surveillance policies, urging stakeholders to monitor ministry decisions closely.

Conclusion

India’s satellite location tracking proposal for smartphones underscores the tension between enhanced surveillance needs and user privacy rights, with telecom firms pushing for A-GPS integration amid opposition from Apple, Google, and Samsung. As the world’s second-largest mobile market grapples with these issues, the outcome could reshape digital security norms globally. Policymakers and users alike should stay vigilant for updates from the home and IT ministries to understand evolving implications for personal data protection.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/india-considers-mandatory-satellite-tracking-on-smartphones-as-apple-and-google-push-back

Piyasa Fırsatı
EPNS Logosu
EPNS Fiyatı(PUSH)
$0.01508
$0.01508$0.01508
+25.14%
USD
EPNS (PUSH) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41