Today, there is news circulating about a sharp and sudden drop in Bitcoin mining hashrate. The news is indeed true, but it has been spread with a clear excess ofToday, there is news circulating about a sharp and sudden drop in Bitcoin mining hashrate. The news is indeed true, but it has been spread with a clear excess of

Bitcoin: sharp and sudden drop in hashrate?

2025/12/15 18:21
hashrate bitcoin

Today, there is a report suggesting a sharp and sudden drop in Bitcoin mining hashrate. The report is indeed true, but it has been disseminated with a clear excess of sensationalism. 

In fact, upon closer analysis, it is revealed that this is not an abnormal decline, but rather an entirely physiological drop.

To understand this dynamic, however, it is necessary to start with an important clarification.

Hashrate and Bitcoin Price

Many people believe that the market value of a BTC depends on its “production” cost (although it would be more accurate to use the term mining).

In reality, this is false for two reasons. 

The first is that, in reality, the exact opposite is true. It is not the selling price that depends on the extraction cost, but the extraction cost that is adjusted based on the market value. 

The cost of mining a BTC is not only not fixed, and not set in any way, but depends solely and exclusively on the arbitrary choices of the miners. 

Miners decide how much money to invest, and spend, in BTC mining based on how much they expect to earn from sales, therefore based on what the selling price is at that moment, and what they anticipate it might be in the near future.

The second reason is that miners now extract only 3.125 BTC per block, and at a rate of about one block every 10 minutes, they extract approximately 450 BTC per day. 

Assuming they sell them all, even though this is not actually true, a constant selling pressure of an additional 450 BTC per day is irrelevant compared to the over 2,000 BTC per day that have been collectively withdrawn from crypto exchanges in the last thirty days alone.

Therefore, the sale of BTC mined by miners is now considered a dynamic that is not capable of dominating the crypto markets except in rare exceptions. 

The Decline of Hashrate

Taking as a reference CoinWarz’s hourly estimates, the highest peak of the hashrate in the last thirty days was reached on December 8th, well over 1,360 eH/s. 

That day the price of BTC had climbed back above $92,000 after having dropped below $89,000 the previous day. 

As recently as Saturday the 13th, the hashrate was above 1,200 eH/s, but today it hit a low peak even below 880. 

Technically, it would be a 26% drop in less than 48 hours, but although this figure might seem dramatic, in reality, it is absolutely physiological. 

First of all, it should be noted that today’s minimum peak is higher than that of December 5th, when the estimated hashrate dropped below 860 eH/s. 

Furthermore, it is important to specify that since Friday, the price of Bitcoin has dropped from $92,500 to $88,000. As usual, it is the market value that has influenced the miners’ decisions, and consequently the hashrate used for BTC mining, not the other way around. 

No Problem

Additionally, it should be noted that the measurement of Bitcoin’s hashrate is actually based solely on an indirect estimate, so the hourly data is somewhat unreliable. 

For instance, it’s much better to use the seven-day moving averages from Hashrate Index. 

The current value, which also includes the drop in hashrate over the past two days, stands just below 1,100 eH/s. It is important to reiterate that this is the seven-day moving average of estimates made based on the blocktime of each individual block. 

Well, on December 5th, when the previous weekly low peak was reached, this value had dropped to 1.030 eH/s, which is even lower, albeit slightly. 

In fact, if we go back in time to shortly after mid-October, when the all-time peak of the seven-day moving average of Bitcoin’s hashrate was reached (1.157 eH/s), the decline reduces to an insignificant -9%, which is significantly lower than the -16% recorded by the price of BTC in the same period.

Moreover, the current level of hashrate is still significantly higher compared to early September, when the price of BTC was above $110,000. 

The Temporal Discrepancy of Bitcoin’s Hashrate

There is another dynamic related to Bitcoin’s hashrate that often eludes many. 

The hashrate increases as the market value of BTC rises, and vice versa.

However, significantly increasing the hashrate takes a considerable amount of time. 

Indeed, first of all, it is necessary to secure the funds to finance the purchase of new machines. Then, they must be ordered and one must wait for their delivery, which often can take several months. Finally, they need to be installed and configured.

As a result, when the price rises (which can happen very quickly), it does lead to an increase in hashrate, but over much longer timeframes. 

For example, when the price of BTC skyrocketed from $70,000 to over $100,000 within a few weeks, following Donald Trump’s electoral victory, Bitcoin’s hashrate took a full three months to rise from just under 750 eH/s to 835 eH/s.

Moreover, the rise continued even as the price in the early months of 2025 was descending back towards $80,000, precisely because these are two dynamics with very different timings.

This also applies when the price drops, although in this case reducing the hashrate is much simpler: just turn off the less efficient machines, namely those that, for the same amount of BTC mined, incur higher costs. 

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Rally Past $2 Before the End of 2025?

XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Rally Past $2 Before the End of 2025?

The post XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Rally Past $2 Before the End of 2025? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The XRP price has come under enormous pressure
Paylaş
CoinPedia2025/12/16 19:22
BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

The post BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BlackRock is steering $185 billion worth of model portfolios deeper into US stocks and artificial intelligence. The decision came this week as the asset manager adjusted its entire model suite, increasing its equity allocation and dumping exposure to international developed markets. The firm now sits 2% overweight on stocks, after money moved between several of its biggest exchange-traded funds. This wasn’t a slow shuffle. Billions flowed across multiple ETFs on Tuesday as BlackRock executed the realignment. The iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) alone brought in $3.4 billion, the largest single-day haul in its history. The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) collected $2.3 billion, while the iShares US Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) added nearly $2 billion. The rebalancing triggered swift inflows and outflows that realigned investor exposure on the back of performance data and macroeconomic outlooks. BlackRock raises equities on strong US earnings The model updates come as BlackRock backs the rally in American stocks, fueled by strong earnings and optimism around rate cuts. In an investment letter obtained by Bloomberg, the firm said US companies have delivered 11% earnings growth since the third quarter of 2024. Meanwhile, earnings across other developed markets barely touched 2%. That gap helped push the decision to drop international holdings in favor of American ones. Michael Gates, lead portfolio manager for BlackRock’s Target Allocation ETF model portfolio suite, said the US market is the only one showing consistency in sales growth, profit delivery, and revisions in analyst forecasts. “The US equity market continues to stand alone in terms of earnings delivery, sales growth and sustainable trends in analyst estimates and revisions,” Michael wrote. He added that non-US developed markets lagged far behind, especially when it came to sales. This week’s changes reflect that position. The move was made ahead of the Federal…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:44