TLDR Uniswap governance approves the UNIfication proposal, marking a shift in protocol economics. The proposal activates a protocol fee switch, which will burn TLDR Uniswap governance approves the UNIfication proposal, marking a shift in protocol economics. The proposal activates a protocol fee switch, which will burn

Uniswap Governance Approves UNIfication Proposal with 100 Million Token Burn

TLDR

  • Uniswap governance approves the UNIfication proposal, marking a shift in protocol economics.
  • The proposal activates a protocol fee switch, which will burn UNI tokens continuously.
  • The approved plan will burn 100 million UNI tokens, aligning with future protocol growth.
  • The shift comes amid increasing DeFi regulation, with a focus on long-term protocol development.

Uniswap governance has overwhelmingly approved the highly anticipated ‘UNIfication’ proposal, with 99.9% of voters supporting the measure. This decision marks a pivotal moment in the protocol’s evolution, as it activates the long-awaited “fee switch.” The implementation of the fee switch fundamentally alters the economics of Uniswap by redirecting a portion of the protocol’s trading fees, previously distributed solely to liquidity providers, to the protocol itself. These redirected funds will be used to continuously burn UNI tokens, effectively introducing a deflationary element to the token’s economy.

Protocol Fee Switch and Token Burn Mechanism

A core aspect of the UNIfication proposal is the activation of the fee switch. This feature redirects a fraction of the trading fees from liquidity providers to the Uniswap protocol. In turn, these funds will be used to burn UNI tokens. The goal is to decrease the total supply of UNI over time, creating a deflationary loop that strengthens the value proposition of the token. Additionally, net sequencer fees from Unichain will contribute to the burn, further amplifying the deflationary effects.

https://twitter.com/lowercaseboot/status/2004311253070864716?s=20 

The proposal estimates that, if the fee switch had been active from the inception of the protocol, approximately 100 million UNI tokens would have been burned by now. This figure highlights the significant potential of the fee switch to reduce the circulating supply of UNI and increase scarcity over time. After a two-day timelock, the protocol is set to burn 100 million UNI tokens, signaling the start of this long-term deflationary strategy.

Changes to Uniswap Foundation and Governance

In addition to the activation of the fee switch, the UNIfication proposal brings changes to the governance structure and operational responsibilities of the Uniswap ecosystem. One major aspect is the transfer of responsibilities from the Uniswap Foundation to Uniswap Labs. This move consolidates the operational aspects of the protocol, aiming to streamline decision-making and improve efficiency in execution. The proposal also establishes an annual growth budget, funded by UNI tokens, to support the development and expansion of Uniswap over the coming years.

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams commented on the changes, noting that the transition marks the beginning of the next phase in the protocol’s development. He emphasized that this move sets the stage for the growth and sustainability of Uniswap in the long term, especially as the decentralized finance (DeFi) space reaches a critical juncture amid increasing regulatory scrutiny.

Deflationary Model and Long-Term Strategy

The UNIfication proposal marks a clear shift toward a deflationary economic model for Uniswap. By burning UNI tokens on an ongoing basis, the protocol aims to reduce the overall supply, potentially increasing the value of the remaining tokens. This deflationary loop is directly tied to the usage of the protocol, meaning that as more users trade on Uniswap, the burn mechanism will accelerate, further reducing the circulating supply.

This change comes at a time when DeFi protocols are facing increasing regulatory attention. In light of this, the proposal reflects Uniswap’s commitment to strengthening its position within the ecosystem while adapting to a shifting regulatory landscape. The shift toward a deflationary model could serve as a counterbalance to the uncertainty that has been surrounding the DeFi sector, positioning Uniswap for continued growth and resilience.

The post Uniswap Governance Approves UNIfication Proposal with 100 Million Token Burn appeared first on CoinCentral.

Piyasa Fırsatı
TokenFi Logosu
TokenFi Fiyatı(TOKEN)
$0.002386
$0.002386$0.002386
-1.97%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Paylaş
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Paylaş
PANews2025/09/18 07:00