'We intend to avail of all appropriate remedies under the law to seek its reversal,' says Julianna Agpalo, Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil's legal counsel'We intend to avail of all appropriate remedies under the law to seek its reversal,' says Julianna Agpalo, Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil's legal counsel

Groups decry court order affirming Cumpio, Domequil’s terror conviction

2026/03/28 15:54
Okuma süresi: 5 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

CEBU, Philippines – Groups condemned the Tacloban City Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 45’s denial of activists Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil’s appeals on their terror financing conviction and bail plea.

Julianna Agpalo, Cumpio and Domequil’s legal counsel, told Rappler on Friday evening, March 27, that they disagreed with the ruling and found it to be unjust.

“We likewise express our grave concern over the continued prosecution of cases founded on provisions that are patently unconstitutional, thereby rendering any continued detention unjust and inequitable,” she said.

The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) said in a statement on Friday that they were “extremely disappointed” with the court’s decision.

According to the NUJP, the judge’s “blind faith” in the testimonies of self-declared rebel surrenderers sets a dangerous precedent for journalists, humanitarian workers, and activists in the country.

“Even without documentary evidence, the court can punish those wrongfully accused by individuals acting in cahoots with state security forces,” the NUJP stressed.

The Altermidya Network condemned the ruling, calling out the court’s verdict for “resting heavily on incredible and preposterous testimonies of dubious witnesses.”

On Saturday, March 28, KAPATID, a support group for friends and family members of political prisoners, also condemned the court’s ruling.

Hindi sila terorista. Sila ay kabataang tagapaglingkod at mamamahayag na pinarusahan sa gawa-gawang kaso (They are not terrorists. They are young people who serve and journalists who were penalized with trumped-up charges),” KAPATID’s statement read.

On January 22, Cumpio and Domequil were convicted of terrorism financing based on the testimonies of alleged rebel returnees, effectively penalizing them with 12 to 18 years imprisonment.

Five days later, the two activists, through their counsel, filed a joint motion to be allowed post-conviction bail. This was denied by the court on February 13. 

The accused had filed a motion for reconsideration on February 6 to appeal the conviction. They also filed a joint motion for reconsideration to appeal the denial of their bail plea later that month, on February 23.

“The arguments raised by the movants-accused merely reiterated some matters that were previously considered and resolved,” Judge Georgina Uy Perez of the Tacloban City RTC Branch 45 said in an omnibus order on Wednesday, March 25.

What were the appeals?

In their appeal of the terror conviction, the accused argued that the judgment was “tainted by reversible errors of law and serious misappreciation of facts.”

They provided four reasons why this was the case:

  • the absence, at the time material to the case, of a valid, operative, and constitutionally sound designation of the Communist Party of the Philippines-New People’s Army (CPP-NPA) within the Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act of 2012
  • the prosecution’s failure to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the accused knowingly, willfully, and lawfully made funds or property available to a designated person or organization
  • a misappreciation of evidence in the form of undue and uncritical reliance on the testimonies of cooperating former rebels without independent corroboration required by law
  • the discounting of the defense’s evidence through an application of an incorrect and asymmetrical standard of proof.

In a Facebook post on Friday, Ephraim Cortez, president of the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers, explained that the alleged act of terrorism financing was committed before the CPP-NPA was designated a terrorist organization by a foreign jurisdiction.

“Moreover, the Supreme Court declared designation by a foreign jurisdiction unconstitutional in Calleja vs. Executive Secretary. While the acts attributed to Frenchie and Marielle were allegedly committed before the promulgation of Calleja vs. Executive Secretary, the complaint against them was filed after the Supreme Court rendered its aforecited decision,” Cortez added.

In the joint appeal for the bail plea, the accused stated that bail should not be denied solely based on the nature or the gravity of the offense, or on speculative considerations.

“The prosecution merely invoked national security, symbolism, and third-party conduct, while the accused-movants presented documentary evidence showing the nonexistence of the bail-negating circumstances,” the omnibus order said, citing the joint motion.

The accused argued that they fully cooperated with the proceedings and did not evade the court’s jurisdiction, making them unlikely to abscond if granted bail.

What did the court say?

The judge clarified that it did not rely only on the designations of the CPP-NPA from foreign jurisdictions. Uy referred to Proclamation No. 374, issued on December 5, 2017, that declared the CPP-NPA as a designated organization.

“The movants’ insistence that no valid designation existed at the time of the commission of the offense is therefore contradicted by statute and the undisputed factual record,” Uy said in the order.

The court also maintained that the prosecution’s witnesses, the former rebels, were able to establish the voluntary nature of the accused’s act in financing terrorism, and that the witness testimonies were credible and corroborated one another.

The judge also reiterated her previous take on the discounting of the defense’s evidence, stating that mere presentation of documentary or digital evidence would not automatically overcome positive identification.

“The court reiterates that proof beyond reasonable doubt does not require absolute certainty, only moral certainty — that degree of proof which produces conviction in an unprejudiced mind,” Uy ruled. 

As of this writing, the court stated that the transfer order for Cumpio and Domequil from the Tacloban City Jail to the Correctional Institution for Women in Mandaluyong City will remain in effect. 

“We intend to avail of all appropriate remedies under the law to seek its reversal,” Agpalo said. – Rappler.com

Piyasa Fırsatı
Orderly Network Logosu
Orderly Network Fiyatı(ORDER)
$0.0481
$0.0481$0.0481
-6.23%
USD
Orderly Network (ORDER) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Royal Government of Bhutan transfers $107M in Bitcoin to new wallets

Royal Government of Bhutan transfers $107M in Bitcoin to new wallets

The post Royal Government of Bhutan transfers $107M in Bitcoin to new wallets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways The Royal Government of Bhutan moved $107 million in Bitcoin to a new wallet. The transfer is part of Bhutan’s ongoing crypto asset activities. The Royal Government of Bhutan transferred $107 million worth of Bitcoin to new wallets today. The move represents one of the latest crypto asset transactions by the Himalayan nation, which has been actively involved in Bitcoin operations. The transfer was tracked through blockchain records showing the movement of the digital assets to a different wallet address. Bhutan has emerged as one of the few countries to directly engage in Bitcoin mining and holdings, utilizing its abundant hydroelectric power resources for cryptocurrency operations. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/bhutan-transfers-40m-bitcoin-new-wallet/
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 21:37
Based Eggman $GGs Grabs Ethereum Investors’ Focus in 2025 Institutional Presale Rally

Based Eggman $GGs Grabs Ethereum Investors’ Focus in 2025 Institutional Presale Rally

Ethereum holders are shifting attention to Based Eggman $GGs, a new crypto token presale making waves in the crypto presale list of 2025 among the top crypto presales.
Paylaş
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:30
Wormhole unveils strategic reserve to accumulate W token

Wormhole unveils strategic reserve to accumulate W token

The post Wormhole unveils strategic reserve to accumulate W token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Wormhole announced the creation of a strategic reserve aimed at supporting the value of its native W token. The reserve is part of a broader tokenomics initiative by Wormhole to enhance utility and value within its cross-chain protocol ecosystem. Wormhole introduced a strategic reserve designed to accumulate value into its W token, according to a blog post published today. The cross-chain protocol announced the initiative as part of its tokenomics strategy. The W token serves as Wormhole’s native digital asset within its interoperability ecosystem that connects multiple blockchain networks. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/wormhole-strategic-reserve-w-token-value/
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:49

Trade GOLD, Share 1,000,000 USDT

Trade GOLD, Share 1,000,000 USDTTrade GOLD, Share 1,000,000 USDT

0 fees, up to 1,000x leverage, deep liquidity