I’ve always wanted to add an interesting spin-off to this Crypto “Three Kingdoms” article: 1) The Crypto Native Narrative School corresponds to the isolated "Shu Kingdom", which is located in the dangerous Bashu area. Vitalik Buterin is the "Zhuge Liang, drawing the Rollup Centric" and "ZK Endgame" as the roadmap of the grand blueprint. Advocating the concepts of governing the country with virtue, such as "Code is Law" and "decentralization", is very similar to Liu Bei's benevolence and righteousness. It seems to be on the moral high ground, but it is restricted everywhere in the cruel market competition. What about joining forces with Wu to fight against Cao, and conquering the Central Plains in the north? New technology narratives have been introduced time and time again, from DeFi to NFT to layer2 and AI Agent. Just like Ge Liang's six expeditions to Qishan, each one was a grand event, but the application of Mass Adoption was always one step away. Until Zhuge Liang died after devoting himself to his work, developers fled the AI community, leaving behind a dwindling pool of talent and a lack of successors. While I hate to say that idealism was the first to fall, the good news is that the belief in "Han and traitors cannot coexist" and the spirit of decentralization will continue to be the industry's guiding principles. 2) The CEX Exchange Alliance corresponds to the "Wei State" that occupies the Central Plains, with CZ as "Cao Cao", who holds "user liquidity" and "currency listing rights" to hold the emperor hostage and control the princes. They vigorously pursued a "military farming" strategy, establishing a new ICO pipeline consisting of Wallet, Alpha, and contracts, encircling all parties within their own internal market. Fortunately, they prioritized talent, recruiting both technical and MEME-focused investors as long as they could generate trading volume. Consequently, China's national strength reached its peak, crushing all competitors. However, the biggest risk of this approach is fostering too many "parasites"—market makers, project owners, and KOLs—all sucking away revenue. Once problems arise, the entire system collapses instantly. This ultimately created a bustling and prosperous era, but after a wave of vigorous "regulatory arbitrage," it ultimately became a mirage. Ultimately, they will either be "recruited" by regulators, "shorn of power" by internal interest groups, or "usurped" by new forces. This constant spree of "quick money projects" and overdrawing the industry's long-term credit is bound to backfire. It's unclear whether the CEX empire will ultimately be named "Zhao" or "Trump." 3) Wall Street financial capital represents the "Eastern Wu" that controls Jiangdong, with Wall Street institutions like Coinbase and BlackRock and US political figures representing "Sun Quan." They collaborate with the tech-savvy Shu Kingdom to promote decentralized innovation, while collaborating with the Wei Kingdom to develop compliant CEX channels. They partner with whoever is useful, employing a strategic strategy of "uniting with secondary enemies to attack the primary one," carefully strategizing and assessing the situation. Just like the Eastern Wu dynasty, which controlled the Yangtze River, Wall Street has seized the advantage of "dollar hegemony" and its "compliance moat." They control off-chain access with ETFs, on-chain settlement with USDT and USDC, and are infiltrating the DeFi ecosystem with RWA strategies like tokenizing US stocks and on-chain US Treasury bonds. The smartest strategy now is to bide one's time, letting the tech-savvy CEXs fight a decisive battle while they quietly plan and profit. There's no doubt that if the future trend of crypto is toward compliance, institutionalization, and licensing, then the crypto world will ultimately belong to Wall Street. Now you understand why they say the old Northern Wei dynasty might soon be ruled by the Eastern Wu "Trump." The difference is that Trump is not Sima Yi, and he doesn't need to lie low and be sneaky.I’ve always wanted to add an interesting spin-off to this Crypto “Three Kingdoms” article: 1) The Crypto Native Narrative School corresponds to the isolated "Shu Kingdom", which is located in the dangerous Bashu area. Vitalik Buterin is the "Zhuge Liang, drawing the Rollup Centric" and "ZK Endgame" as the roadmap of the grand blueprint. Advocating the concepts of governing the country with virtue, such as "Code is Law" and "decentralization", is very similar to Liu Bei's benevolence and righteousness. It seems to be on the moral high ground, but it is restricted everywhere in the cruel market competition. What about joining forces with Wu to fight against Cao, and conquering the Central Plains in the north? New technology narratives have been introduced time and time again, from DeFi to NFT to layer2 and AI Agent. Just like Ge Liang's six expeditions to Qishan, each one was a grand event, but the application of Mass Adoption was always one step away. Until Zhuge Liang died after devoting himself to his work, developers fled the AI community, leaving behind a dwindling pool of talent and a lack of successors. While I hate to say that idealism was the first to fall, the good news is that the belief in "Han and traitors cannot coexist" and the spirit of decentralization will continue to be the industry's guiding principles. 2) The CEX Exchange Alliance corresponds to the "Wei State" that occupies the Central Plains, with CZ as "Cao Cao", who holds "user liquidity" and "currency listing rights" to hold the emperor hostage and control the princes. They vigorously pursued a "military farming" strategy, establishing a new ICO pipeline consisting of Wallet, Alpha, and contracts, encircling all parties within their own internal market. Fortunately, they prioritized talent, recruiting both technical and MEME-focused investors as long as they could generate trading volume. Consequently, China's national strength reached its peak, crushing all competitors. However, the biggest risk of this approach is fostering too many "parasites"—market makers, project owners, and KOLs—all sucking away revenue. Once problems arise, the entire system collapses instantly. This ultimately created a bustling and prosperous era, but after a wave of vigorous "regulatory arbitrage," it ultimately became a mirage. Ultimately, they will either be "recruited" by regulators, "shorn of power" by internal interest groups, or "usurped" by new forces. This constant spree of "quick money projects" and overdrawing the industry's long-term credit is bound to backfire. It's unclear whether the CEX empire will ultimately be named "Zhao" or "Trump." 3) Wall Street financial capital represents the "Eastern Wu" that controls Jiangdong, with Wall Street institutions like Coinbase and BlackRock and US political figures representing "Sun Quan." They collaborate with the tech-savvy Shu Kingdom to promote decentralized innovation, while collaborating with the Wei Kingdom to develop compliant CEX channels. They partner with whoever is useful, employing a strategic strategy of "uniting with secondary enemies to attack the primary one," carefully strategizing and assessing the situation. Just like the Eastern Wu dynasty, which controlled the Yangtze River, Wall Street has seized the advantage of "dollar hegemony" and its "compliance moat." They control off-chain access with ETFs, on-chain settlement with USDT and USDC, and are infiltrating the DeFi ecosystem with RWA strategies like tokenizing US stocks and on-chain US Treasury bonds. The smartest strategy now is to bide one's time, letting the tech-savvy CEXs fight a decisive battle while they quietly plan and profit. There's no doubt that if the future trend of crypto is toward compliance, institutionalization, and licensing, then the crypto world will ultimately belong to Wall Street. Now you understand why they say the old Northern Wei dynasty might soon be ruled by the Eastern Wu "Trump." The difference is that Trump is not Sima Yi, and he doesn't need to lie low and be sneaky.

Crypto Three Kingdoms Extra: When Wall Street's compliance fleet enters the DeFi Yangtze River

2025/10/17 13:00
4 min read

I’ve always wanted to add an interesting spin-off to this Crypto “Three Kingdoms” article:

1) The Crypto Native Narrative School corresponds to the isolated "Shu Kingdom", which is located in the dangerous Bashu area. Vitalik Buterin is the "Zhuge Liang, drawing the Rollup Centric" and "ZK Endgame" as the roadmap of the grand blueprint.

Advocating the concepts of governing the country with virtue, such as "Code is Law" and "decentralization", is very similar to Liu Bei's benevolence and righteousness. It seems to be on the moral high ground, but it is restricted everywhere in the cruel market competition.

What about joining forces with Wu to fight against Cao, and conquering the Central Plains in the north? New technology narratives have been introduced time and time again, from DeFi to NFT to layer2 and AI Agent. Just like Ge Liang's six expeditions to Qishan, each one was a grand event, but the application of Mass Adoption was always one step away.

Until Zhuge Liang died after devoting himself to his work, developers fled the AI community, leaving behind a dwindling pool of talent and a lack of successors. While I hate to say that idealism was the first to fall, the good news is that the belief in "Han and traitors cannot coexist" and the spirit of decentralization will continue to be the industry's guiding principles.

2) The CEX Exchange Alliance corresponds to the "Wei State" that occupies the Central Plains, with CZ as "Cao Cao", who holds "user liquidity" and "currency listing rights" to hold the emperor hostage and control the princes.

They vigorously pursued a "military farming" strategy, establishing a new ICO pipeline consisting of Wallet, Alpha, and contracts, encircling all parties within their own internal market. Fortunately, they prioritized talent, recruiting both technical and MEME-focused investors as long as they could generate trading volume. Consequently, China's national strength reached its peak, crushing all competitors.

However, the biggest risk of this approach is fostering too many "parasites"—market makers, project owners, and KOLs—all sucking away revenue. Once problems arise, the entire system collapses instantly. This ultimately created a bustling and prosperous era, but after a wave of vigorous "regulatory arbitrage," it ultimately became a mirage.

Ultimately, they will either be "recruited" by regulators, "shorn of power" by internal interest groups, or "usurped" by new forces. This constant spree of "quick money projects" and overdrawing the industry's long-term credit is bound to backfire. It's unclear whether the CEX empire will ultimately be named "Zhao" or "Trump."

3) Wall Street financial capital represents the "Eastern Wu" that controls Jiangdong, with Wall Street institutions like Coinbase and BlackRock and US political figures representing "Sun Quan." They collaborate with the tech-savvy Shu Kingdom to promote decentralized innovation, while collaborating with the Wei Kingdom to develop compliant CEX channels. They partner with whoever is useful, employing a strategic strategy of "uniting with secondary enemies to attack the primary one," carefully strategizing and assessing the situation.

Just like the Eastern Wu dynasty, which controlled the Yangtze River, Wall Street has seized the advantage of "dollar hegemony" and its "compliance moat." They control off-chain access with ETFs, on-chain settlement with USDT and USDC, and are infiltrating the DeFi ecosystem with RWA strategies like tokenizing US stocks and on-chain US Treasury bonds. The smartest strategy now is to bide one's time, letting the tech-savvy CEXs fight a decisive battle while they quietly plan and profit.

There's no doubt that if the future trend of crypto is toward compliance, institutionalization, and licensing, then the crypto world will ultimately belong to Wall Street. Now you understand why they say the old Northern Wei dynasty might soon be ruled by the Eastern Wu "Trump."

The difference is that Trump is not Sima Yi, and he doesn't need to lie low and be sneaky.

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.00034
$0.00034$0.00034
-3.68%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump MAGA statue has strange crypto backstory

Trump MAGA statue has strange crypto backstory

The post Trump MAGA statue has strange crypto backstory appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A 15-foot-tall statue of former President Donald Trump, cast in bronze
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/04 08:22
ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

The post ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Kimmel (Photo by Media Access Awards Presented By Easterseals/Getty Images for Easterseals) Getty Images for Easterseals The shock decision by ABC to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely” after the late-night host’s remarks about the killing of Charlie Kirk has created a rare moment in modern TV media: A major show abruptly taken off the air, with its network forced into crisis-management mode. Rare, that is, but not unprecedented. What might go unnoticed by many people reacting to the news about Kimmel and his potential cancellation is that this is not the first time ABC has made such a move. In fact, a version of the same thing happened to Kimmel’s predecessor program — Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect, which once had Kimmel’s slot and which ABC cancelled in the wake of a firestorm around comments Maher made in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. (Notice, by the way, that I said cancelled “in the wake of” and not “because of.” More on that in a moment.) Here’s what happened: Less than a week after 9/11, Maher and a panel were talking about then-President George W. Bush’s use of the word “cowards” to describe the hijackers. “We have been the cowards,” Maher interjected, referencing the practice of “lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That’s cowardly.” But Maher then went even farther over the line: Actually staying in an airplane as it hits a building? “Not cowardly.” You can read more about the ensuing uproar in this ABC news story from 2001, which includes a statement that Maher issued through his publicist: “In no way was I intending to say, nor have I ever thought, that the men and women who defend our nation in uniform are anything but courageous and valiant, and I offer my apologies to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:02
The real-life inspiration for the protagonist of "The Big Short": Bitcoin crash may trigger a $1 billion gold and silver sell-off.

The real-life inspiration for the protagonist of "The Big Short": Bitcoin crash may trigger a $1 billion gold and silver sell-off.

PANews reported on February 4th that, according to CoinDesk, Michael Burry, the real-life inspiration for the character in "The Big Short" (and an investor who
Share
PANews2026/02/04 08:22