Author: 137Labs Recently, there have been several substantial developments in the tokenized stocks sector: Kraken launches xStocks, an on-chain tokenized stock Author: 137Labs Recently, there have been several substantial developments in the tokenized stocks sector: Kraken launches xStocks, an on-chain tokenized stock

US Stock Market Logic + On-Chain 72-Hour Trading: Detailed Explanation of Mechanisms and Market Data

2026/02/27 18:24
6 min read

Author: 137Labs

Recently, there have been several substantial developments in the tokenized stocks sector:

US Stock Market Logic + On-Chain 72-Hour Trading: Detailed Explanation of Mechanisms and Market Data
  • Kraken launches xStocks, an on-chain tokenized stock platform

  • Coinbase is seeking regulatory approval.

  • Solana submits a blockchain-based framework for tokenized securities.

  • Robinhood launches tokenized equity product in Europe

Meanwhile, global market data shows that the size of tokenized stocks is growing rapidly, providing important context for understanding this trend.

I. On-chain 72-hour transaction mechanism

1. Traditional US stock trading mechanism

The traditional U.S. stock market has the following core characteristics:

  • Fixed trading hours

    Trading is primarily conducted during regular trading hours on weekdays (Eastern Time), with weaker liquidity before and after market hours, and liquidity concentrated during the main market hours.

  • T+1 settlement system

    After a transaction is completed, the settlement of funds and securities is usually completed on the next trading day (historically, it was T+2).

  • Mature clearing system

    Transactions and settlements are completed through licensed securities firms and clearing institutions, a mature system with high certainty of delivery.

Advantages: Stable system, clear laws, and mature risk control.

Limitations: Trading hours are restricted, and global investors face time zone friction.

2. On-chain extended transaction period mechanism

A significant characteristic of tokenized US stocks is the extended trading hours:

  • xStocks offers 24/7 trading.

  • Robinhood's European version offers 24/7 access.

  • Multiple on-chain solutions are attempting to achieve near 24/7 trading.

Representative participants include:

  • Backed Finance

  • Solana Policy Institute

  • Ondo Finance

Key differences:

On-chain tokens can be transferred in real time, but this is not equivalent to the legally binding and final settlement of the underlying stock.

In most structures:

  • The actual shares are still held by the securities firm or custodian institution.

  • On-chain transactions are reflected in the circulation of share certificates.

  • Final legal settlement relies on the traditional clearing system

therefore:

II. Classification of Platforms Supporting On-Chain Integration of US Stocks

The current market can be roughly divided into four categories:

  1. Centralized Exchanges (CEXs)

  2. Compliant tokenization issuers

  3. Public chain + ecosystem framework players

  4. Derivatives Protocol (Tokenization of Non-Real Stocks)

1. Centralized Exchanges (CEX)

(1) Kraken – xStocks

  • Launch date: June 2025

  • Partners: Backed Finance, Solana

  • Supported stocks: 200+ US stocks

  • Trading hours: 5 x 24 hours

Ecological cooperation includes:

  • Raydium

  • Jupiter

  • Kamino Finance

  • Chainlink

  • Alpaca

Features:

  • Supports both CEX and on-chain transactions

  • Can be used as collateral in loan agreements

  • Introducing a market maker system

  • The structure is relatively complete

(2) Coinbase

  • Seeking no action letter or exemption from the SEC

  • Plans to open tokenized shares to US users

  • The idea of ​​issuing COIN on-chain was proposed in 2020.

If approved, it will become the first large-scale exchange-based tokenized stock platform targeting users in the United States.

(3) Robinhood (European version)

  • Based on Arbitrum

  • Support dividend distribution

  • 5 x 24-hour access

  • Free transfer on the chain is not allowed

Its essence is a price tracking structure, rather than a fully freely tradable on-chain stock.

(4) Bybit

  • Participate in the xStocks ecosystem

  • Previously launched a US stock index trading platform based on MT5.

  • Primarily employs derivatives logic

2. Compliant tokenization issuers

(1) Dinari (US registered)

  • Established: 2021

  • Tokenized stocks to be launched in 2023

  • Partner brokers: Alpaca, Interactive Brokers

  • Supported networks: Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base

  • KYC is required

  • Trading only during US stock market trading hours

  • Does not support free circulation on the blockchain

scale:

  • Stock size in the millions of dollars

  • TVL is mainly concentrated in government bond products.

Features: Operates entirely within the SEC framework.

(2) Backed Finance (Swiss registered)

  • Established: 2021

  • Launched in early 2023

  • Release ERC-20 bSTOCK

  • Support free on-chain transactions

  • KYC is not mandatory for end users.

Public data:

  • The tokenized shares are valued at approximately $20 million.

  • Flow pool TVL approximately $8 million

  • Average LP yield is approximately 30%+

Support Chain:

  • Gnosis

  • Base

  • Avalanche

(3) SwarmX

  • European Registration

  • Similar to Backed

  • Smaller scale

  • Support on-chain transactions

(4) Exodus (NYSE: EXOD)

  • US-listed companies

  • Allows migration of its own stock to Algorand

  • On-chain transactions are not supported.

  • Not possessing full shareholder equity

It belongs to the category of "digital registration" tokenization.

3. Public blockchain + ecosystem framework players

(1) Solana – Project Open

  • Promoted through the Solana Policy Institute

  • Submit a framework for tokenized securities issuance

  • Issuers need to register

  • Investors need to complete KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures.

  • Allow on-chain transfer agent records

We are applying for an 18-month exemption to support on-chain transactions.

(2)Ondo – Global Markets

  • RWA, a major player in the Treasury bond market

  • Plans to launch tokenized US stocks

  • 24/7 trading

  • Instant casting and destruction

  • Can be used as collateral

  • For non-US users

(3) Superstate

  • Related to the Solana framework

  • Focus on RWA compliance structure

  • Stock tokenization has not yet been widely implemented.

4. Derivatives Protocols (Tokenization of Non-Real Stocks)

These platforms do not buy real stocks, but instead provide price tracking products.

(1) Gains Network

  • Deployed on Arbitrum / Polygon

  • Similar to perpetual contracts

  • Quoting using Chainlink

  • No KYC required

  • Average daily trading volume < 2 million USD

(2) Helix (Injective)

  • Supports US stocks and foreign exchange

  • Daily trading volume < $10 million

  • No KYC required

(3) Synthetix / Mirror

  • Launched in 2020

  • Synthetic asset model

  • Trading volume has not yet reached a significant scale.

(4) Shift

  • Using the reference asset token structure

  • US stocks are held in custody by brokerage firms

  • No KYC required for users

  • No shareholder equity

5. Exploring ETF On-Chain Integration

Index-based assets are better suited for on-chain implementation, for example:

  • Invesco

  • Invesco QQQ Trust

Features:

  • Indexed exposure

  • Risk diversification

  • More suitable as collateral or LP subject matter

Currently, the on-chain size of ETFs is still small, but they are considered easier to standardize.

III. T+1 / T+2 Settlement Differences

Traditional US stocks

  • The current settlement is T+1.

  • Settlement and delivery are required after the transaction.

  • Historically, it was T+2

On-chain tokenization structure

  • Tokens can be transferred in real time.

  • The underlying stocks are still held in custody by securities firms.

  • Legal settlement relies on traditional clearing systems

This results in a "two-layer structure":

  1. Fast on-chain circulation

  2. The underlying assets are settled according to traditional rules.

Potential impacts:

  • Short-term price differences

  • Insufficient on-chain liquidity leads to increased slippage.

  • Redemption risk depends on the issuance structure

in conclusion

The current tokenized US stock market is still relatively small, accounting for a very small percentage of the overall US stock market, but the participants are becoming more diversified.

Its structural features include:

  • Trading hours significantly extended

  • Enhanced on-chain circulation capacity

  • Settlement pathways run parallel to traditional markets

  • Platform types are clearly differentiated

Tokenized US stocks are still in their early stages, but extended trading hours and on-chain composability are changing the way assets circulate, providing new technological pathways for cross-market trading structures.

Disclaimer:

This article is merely a compilation and analysis of relevant market mechanisms and publicly available information, and does not constitute any form of investment advice or invitation to invest. The market is risky; decisions should be made with caution.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003772
$0.0003772$0.0003772
+0.21%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The post The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MANCHESTER, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 14: Gianluigi Donnarumma of Manchester City celebrates the second City goal during the Premier League match between Manchester City and Manchester United at Etihad Stadium on September 14, 2025 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images) Visionhaus/Getty Images For a goalkeeper who’d played an influential role in the club’s first-ever Champions League triumph, it was strange to see Gianluigi Donnarumma so easily discarded. Soccer is a brutal game, but the sudden, drastic demotion of the Italian from Paris Saint-Germain’s lineup for the UEFA Super Cup clash against Tottenham Hotspur before he was sold to Manchester City was shockingly brutal. Coach Luis Enrique isn’t a man who minces his words, so he was blunt when asked about the decision on social media. “I am supported by my club and we are trying to find the best solution,” he told a news conference. “It is a difficult decision. I only have praise for Donnarumma. He is one of the very best goalkeepers out there and an even better man. “But we were looking for a different profile. It’s very difficult to take these types of decisions.” The last line has really stuck, especially since it became clear that Manchester City was Donnarumma’s next destination. Pep Guardiola, under whom the Italian will be playing this season, is known for brutally axing goalkeepers he didn’t feel fit his profile. The most notorious was Joe Hart, who was jettisoned many years ago for very similar reasons to Enrique. So how can it be that the Catalan coach is turning once again to a so-called old-school keeper? Well, the truth, as so often the case, is not quite that simple. As Italian soccer expert James Horncastle pointed out in The Athletic, Enrique’s focus on needing a “different profile” is overblown. Lucas Chevalier,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:38
“We Cannot in Good Conscience Agree”: Anthropic Defies Pentagon Over AI Weapons

“We Cannot in Good Conscience Agree”: Anthropic Defies Pentagon Over AI Weapons

TLDR The Pentagon is demanding Anthropic remove safety guardrails from its Claude AI so it can be used for any lawful purpose, including autonomous weapons and
Share
Coincentral2026/02/27 20:18
If the dollar collapses, will Bitcoin win?

If the dollar collapses, will Bitcoin win?

The rapid decline of the US dollar has rekindled the dream of "super-Bitcoinization" among Bitcoin supporters. But there is little evidence that the dollar's demise spells victory for Bitcoin, and instead plenty of signs pointing to widespread societal dislocation. The Death of the Dollar: Lessons from Currency Collapses Fernando Nikolic, a former vice president of Blockstream who experienced Argentina's financial turmoil, warned that Bitcoin believers who hope for the demise of fiat currency don't know what they are expecting. "Bitcoiners celebrating the collapse of the dollar don't understand what they're asking for... This isn't liberation, this is your grandmother having to eat cat food because her savings evaporated... The demise of the dollar is not a victory for Bitcoin." In a period of true monetary collapse, basic necessities like water and food (not digital assets) would become the only things with real value. Many Americans who fantasize about a sudden transition to a Bitcoin economy have never experienced a true societal collapse. Nickrich warned that the reality is far more chaotic than they imagined and they would not actually welcome the expected demise of the dollar. The bleak picture across the United States points to a stressed fiat currency system The U.S. housing market has never been more unaffordable. Median single-family home prices in 2025 hit a record high, requiring double the income of 2019. The price-to-income ratio has reached an all-time high, homeownership has fallen to an all-time low, and millions of renters are spending 30% to 50% of their income on rent. The imbalance between wages and rising housing costs means that most potential homebuyers are locked out of the market, and social pressures continue to mount. To make matters worse, the U.S. unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.3% in August 2025, the highest level since the end of 2021, and the broader underemployment rate reached 8.1%. The figures mask the pain caused by a labor market that has failed to keep pace with inflation or by stagnant real wages. Against the backdrop of rising unemployment and house prices, the U.S. national debt exceeded $37 trillion in August 2025, more than twice the size of the country's economy. Borrowing costs continue to rise, with interest payments on the national debt exceeding even defense spending. The Congressional Budget Office projects that debt levels will reach that milestone five years earlier than originally planned due to increased borrowing and social spending during the pandemic. Debt growth of $1 trillion every five months is unsustainable and could push up interest rates and squeeze investment. When Fiat Fails, Bitcoin Doesn’t Automatically Win The US dollar index has fallen more than 10% against major currencies this year, its steepest decline since 1973. This decline has been linked to unpredictable economic policies, protectionism, and expansionary tax cuts. As the dollar depreciates, import prices rise, the purchasing power of ordinary Americans decreases, inflation worsens, and household budgets are strained. Depreciation further puts pressure on housing, employment and debt, exacerbating systemic vulnerabilities. All of these grim indicators paint a bleak picture of the fundamentals of the U.S. economy, and the U.S. dollar is often seen as a barometer for the rest of the world’s economies. If the world’s strongest currency is under pressure, what does that mean for the entire fiat currency system? While many Bitcoin advocates cry out that “Bitcoin can solve this problem,” hyperbitcoinization—the idea that people will massively turn to Bitcoin when fiat currencies fail—is a dangerous fantasy. This view ignores historical and social realities: when currencies collapse, trust evaporates, and abstract ideals are replaced by basic survival needs. Nikolic, whose experience was rooted in the collapse of Argentina's fiat currency, testified that the hope of so-called "liberation" was naive: the collapse meant only poverty, instability and suffering. When social safety nets and market norms break down, financial dislocations hit the vulnerable hardest. Bitcoin may offer an alternative to inflationary fiat currencies, but the demise of the dollar will bring not freedom but disaster and suffering to most people.
Share
PANews2025/09/22 17:00