The post Meta’s $135 Billion AI Push Is Stumbling: Layoffs Loom as Flagship Model Trails Rivals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Meta plans to cut overThe post Meta’s $135 Billion AI Push Is Stumbling: Layoffs Loom as Flagship Model Trails Rivals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Meta plans to cut over

Meta’s $135 Billion AI Push Is Stumbling: Layoffs Loom as Flagship Model Trails Rivals

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR:

  • Meta plans to cut over 20% of its 79,000-person workforce, potentially eliminating around 16,000 jobs.
  • Meta’s Avocado model has missed its deadline three times and now trails Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic on benchmarks.
  • Meta is reportedly exploring a temporary deal to license Google’s Gemini to power its own AI products.
  • Meta has committed up to $135 billion in 2026 capex and $600 billion in data center spending through 2028.

Meta layoffs are under scrutiny after Reuters confirmed plans to cut over 20 percent of the company’s roughly 79,000 employees.

About 16,000 jobs could be at risk under the reported plan. The move comes as Meta ramps up AI spending to between $115 and $135 billion in 2026.

However, the company’s own AI model has faced multiple delays. Meta is also reportedly considering licensing a competitor’s technology in the interim.

Model Delays Cast Doubt on the AI Replacement Thesis

Meta’s next-generation AI model, internally codenamed Avocado, has been delayed from March to at least May 2026. Internal benchmarks showed the model falling behind Google’s Gemini 3.0, OpenAI, and Anthropic in key areas.

Those areas include reasoning, coding, and writing performance. The delay comes at a particularly sensitive time for the company.

The delay is not a one-off event. The model has slipped three separate times from its original 2025 release target. Each delay pushes back Meta’s ability to prove that AI can handle work previously done by large teams.

Social media analyst @shanaka86 captured the tension in a widely shared post. He wrote: “Mark Zuckerberg is about to fire 16,000 humans because he believes AI can replace them. His own AI cannot replace Google’s.”

He called this contradiction “the entire story of the 2026 tech economy.” Many investors and observers have since amplified the observation online.

Meta’s previous flagship model, Llama 4 Behemoth, was never released publicly at all. Now the company is reportedly discussing a plan to license Google’s Gemini temporarily. That would mean a competitor’s model running inside Meta AI products under Meta’s own branding.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg told analysts earlier this year that he was “starting to see projects that used to require big teams now accomplished by a single very talented person.”

However, the company’s AI technology has not demonstrated that capability in competitive benchmarks. The layoffs appear to be running ahead of the technology they are supposed to depend on.

Acquisitions and Capital Commitments Add Financial Weight to the Strategy

Meta’s capital expenditure for 2026 is projected between $115 and $135 billion. That is nearly double the roughly $72 billion the company spent on infrastructure last year.

Additionally, Meta has committed to $600 billion in total data center spending through 2028. The scale of that commitment makes the AI model delays all the more consequential.

The company has also moved aggressively on acquisitions in a short time. Meta paid $14.3 billion to bring in Alexandr Wang from Scale AI.

It then spent over $2 billion on Manus and an undisclosed amount on Moltbook. Both deals came within recent months, adding to the company’s growing cost base.

The integration of these acquisitions, however, depends on a model that is still unfinished. Manus processes 147 trillion tokens using third-party AI models, not Meta’s own. Moltbook’s agent systems run on a platform called OpenClaw, also external to Meta’s stack.

Meta hired Nat Friedman, the former GitHub CEO, as part of its talent push. The company also recruited top AI researchers with compensation packages reported to exceed $100 million each. Zuckerberg described the goal as building “the highest talent density lab in the industry.”

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone pushed back on the layoff reports. He called them “speculative reporting about theoretical approaches,” with no confirmed plans or timelines.

Meta’s stock still fell 3.83 percent when the news broke. The proposed cuts would be the company’s largest since the 2022–23 efficiency drive, which removed 21,000 positions.

The post Meta’s $135 Billion AI Push Is Stumbling: Layoffs Loom as Flagship Model Trails Rivals appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/metas-135-billion-ai-push-is-stumbling-layoffs-loom-as-flagship-model-trails-rivals/

Market Opportunity
Succinct Logo
Succinct Price(PROVE)
$0.2658
$0.2658$0.2658
+0.45%
USD
Succinct (PROVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nvidia (NVDA) vs AMD: The Ultimate AI Stock Showdown for 2025

Nvidia (NVDA) vs AMD: The Ultimate AI Stock Showdown for 2025

Nvidia (NVDA) dominates AI chips with superior margins and ecosystem. AMD challenges but trails. Compare both stocks to determine your best AI investment. The post
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/15 19:42
New Research Paper: Why Ripple Will Never Abandon XRP

New Research Paper: Why Ripple Will Never Abandon XRP

Crypto researcher SMQKE has shared excerpts from an academic publication to support the argument that XRP will remain integral to Ripple Labs’ operation. In a post
Share
Timestabloid2026/03/15 19:02